reset? (Diablo 2)
Offer administration, in connection with the announced a week-long quarantine, to reset the ladder. Thus you will make a great contribution to the fight against infection - are going to sit at home and carry wigs.Alex Bitansky
To be confirmed. Who's Warbler, does it weight closed team class type of secondary school?
really? maybe I, in addition to character, another plot to write a basic plot to work, the entrance of which will be revealed and the rest of the main characters, and then twisted the end? and all this for a simple allegory?
For me, arkhon authority certainly has, because I bought his double-digit nickname in runes two years ago. He had every chance to rip me off. I know him as a man of transparent, texttt, what's on your mind - in the language of.
- Great! You have the holes in the plot. Poluchaetsya that archon the truth just because you are not thrown once? Let me give you a list of people who have not thrown me, of course with this capability: from tech, dober, kurt something. this is certainly not the whole list, but purely for contrast will do.
Here it is necessary more precisely.
- Yes, we are back to where we started. I was up all night chew it. That's the essence of the dispute. More precisely nowhere.
Was here
What Archon show off with it presumably to show off, it's not a discredit, and the slap.
And not on an empty place. And for that matter, even if we assume that it is somehow discreditied arcona, then blame not me. He himself and this thing, I just noticed.
to discredit the author discredited the idea
-from a sieve.
Who is after your application will be taken seriously this idea
For example the one whose opinion and actions so waiting for archon. Well, at least my opinion as other players, there is little concern, and even more influence on decisions.
What about philosophizing, even then I think it's more like a normal dispute. moreover, I have already moved into a defensive position that is noble, but not wise. Just talk we are really not so. Longer and longer posts, followed by another longer going. and so it won't RUB.
Uncle Fred
Tifosa just no idea that he is mad, like a grandmother on the bench.
;) To cut, well, so be it.
T-Fox
And you thought, can you bring some friends and equate it to Arjona? Warbler may be sitting or shiz, or even hang around has 300 pieces at a time.
T-Fox wrote:
Let me give you a list of people who have not thrown me
Lists. The only difference is that they have no idea.And if it is, they will not go here with her so they what are they some CWR on the head is not shit by accident, thereby discredit the idea.
And for that matter, even if we assume that it is somehow discreditied Arcana, the blame is not me
Yeah, Obama is to blame. And Stalin. And Shevardnadze slightly.
I think it's more like a normal dispute. moreover, I have already moved into a defensive position that is noble, but not wise
Defending someone? And from whom? Clearly said - write: non Smoking - discussion terminated. Why victim behavior?
Just talk we are really not so. Longer and longer posts, followed by another longer going. and so it won't RUB.
Everything goes fine, it is the norm entirely.
Alex Bitansky
In short, post is long, but the last. So try to Express what I wanted. Let's go through briefly the dialogues in order not to lose the essence of the dispute:
Archon:
- Have an idea, but will reveal it only to administrators, if they are interested.
Fox:
-Hare Panticosa, write a PM to the admins yourself, this is business, not show off.
Bitard:
-CWR, criticizing someone's ideas(the essence), without knowing their, he not show himself from the best side.
Fox:
-Bicard, you're wrong. Criticized not the idea, and how they are presented. (the dispute)
Bitard:
In this case Arcona criticism = criticism of his ideas. (the essence)
Fox:
-Stupidity.(the essence) And here's why...*it is a Simplified story about the Warbler with obvious Parallels to this situation.*
Bitard:
*there is a breakdown on citations, and therefore have a new thread of conversation*
-Branch we philosophize (not the point)
-Branch 'll take that as a compliment (not the point)
-Branch the revelation of characters Archon vs Slavka(not quite the essence, rather trying to run several lines of discussion). Will not go. It is important to know Slavkino place in the hierarchy of his motives. Here is Archon man with the reputation of say what I think because he didn't bail on runes.
-Branch And say again why not criticize the idea of
-Branch Of The Parable. Not matchmaking. It was said that the Glory no one discredited, but its called, OMG, a show-off. (fortunately, not the point. Since the discrediting and criticism are two different concepts that can be interrelated or may not)
-branch discrediting Arcana = discrediting the idea (not the point). *Here is all deceit, RichardSolo plan. If I applevel the idea of not knowing her, I'm an asshole. And initially I was charged. But now, he presses on the fact that because of legitimate criticism of conduct Archana may suffer the fate of his ideas that still does not me to blame, and Arcona. But it's not a matter of dispute, deceit, no more.*
Fox:
-Branch the revelation of characters Archon vs Slavka. I will not once again verbiage about Slavik. but let me just say that the fact is not money - it is not a powerful argument.
-Branch And say again why not criticize the idea. OMG, don't want to.
-Branch Of The Parable. Not matchmaking. If show off = to discredit. then Archie himself discreditied.
-branch discrediting Arcana = discrediting the idea . The weight of my opinion is slightly exaggerated.
--Branch we philosophize Blah blah blah.
Bitard:
-Branch poparciem on the subject of some Slavik is not equal to chelovecesco Gold juniper!
-Branch Archon any different. The difference between them, besides from ideas and fear to Express them before Qurom. *Here we sum up the finger to the nose, a cunning plan already in process. Because in this case they say about the destruction of(discredit) ideas through its negative critique using elements of defecation. Like Leipsic in the discrediting of = criticism. And this is not always the case. In this hypothetical case, the discrediting of Archie led to the decline in demand for his idea, that's for sure. But then discredit ideas is not criticism, but the relationship with the unloved people person. If the idea will offer the person with crystal clear reputation, it also, as they say, shoot. But if the idea is destroyed by critics, that supposedly it should be viable regardless of who is its author. In General, substitution of concepts, confusion of cause and effect.*
-Branch who is to blame(not the point)
-Branch Reduced. The conversation is not essentially continue with minor issues(new branches) and a proposal to merge, if not interesting.
Everything goes fine, it is the norm entirely.
I'm afraid I disagree. Is not written very lucidly, but as best I can, so tell. Allocate one scheme that is sometimes yuzaetsya in the debate. I do not know whether the name of this scheme, but I see it like this: If you imagine the ESSENCE of the discussion topics in the Trunk of a tree, its thick branches growing in different directions from the trunk, there will be questions or arguments on the merits. Then there are small branches with leaves that grow from thick branches are the issues and arguments arising in consequence of the voiced thick branches. That is, indirectly or not influencing\reflects the ESSENCE. And more and more and more are drawing these branches. And it comes to the fact that after not paying no attention to the tree trunk, and the eyes are attracted to beautiful greenery. And if anyone pays, it is still a big part of the trunk is hidden in the foliage.
The scheme yuzayut as politicians and ordinary yard chavs. Even forum trolls. in General, all and Sundry. But Cho, it is convenient because you can use it, for example:
a)to Distract from the fact (Started dispute about the fact that black is not white, but ended up steeper Beha Mercedes)
b)Asking the right questions, distracting from the main, in the end, the luring into the trap, defeat the opponent. for example, to discredit it *ironic*(How can you say that black is not white, if you're here, here, and here screwed up).
C)to Attract more supporters, because in minor matters was expressed correctly, prettier, etc. (Well, we know that black is black, but Vaska was kept cool, and Petya perch, even on the person passed, let him go to hell with his truth. We just ridicule his answers to other questions that do not relate to the theme.)
d)a Way to poluchiti less damage in case of defeat. (Yes, it is true, black is black, but I was right about everything else. Anyway I was joking and you fell for it. *And believe, if in other topics not related to the essence of the issue, he was right, and therefore smarter/smarter*)
d)a Great way of trolling. Bait threw eaten, the subject began to swagger - led. You can swagger and trolls already on several fronts.
So, what am I, that these split quotations, and the creation of the blue haven and other small twigs, which later would evolve at all in God knows what *for Example, in THIS message* sickens me. I such manners controversy try not to. Especially so skillfully play with the facts, to the end, in the end, trying to give Frank the game, I probably won't even be able to. And therefore forced to leave, leaving *in what sense you want, and then understand* the last word for you.
T-Fox
Volodya, the producers from TNT and STS, have already left behind you by written you the script will take the series....)))
Th you baguetes, any trigger know the idea is to give all bobla! Take contacts, wallet number and send the loot to everyone who has registered on the server. And normally, ten of wood in a month + and not the local lottery, where every 10 years 1 person (e.g. FERC) wins the mouse of genius from repair. The nuances may vary end.
By the way, other options to do something that describes archon does not exist in our reality.
Sweety_Mustard wrote:
By the way, other options to do something that describes archon does not exist in our reality.
serves you right!
if only you read carefully, you would have noticed that there are proposed not only to collect a bunch of online but still a decent podzarabotat it is at all anything about some serious about any fact, the passing around of a dozen as your assumption of the question and the game itself such as it is nevertheless the option is still found in nature )
and dfoxo night I wrote a reply and then erased it - why do I need long and tedious to explain something to him if it is similar to justification, he can show off or whatever he thinks it is his personal difficulties I have no such purpose and was not
the goal is simple as day - if you are interested in admin then there will be a conversation, but it will not interest him and was not interested before, he NN no increase in the online or anything else, especially him, and so all have electricity, too
Archon Guard wrote:
if you are interested in admin
Than interested in that? Can you be more specific?
Just from the constant stuffing of type something's coming Potryasayushie, any veiled idea on the forum will be perceived as trolling. Then either write the admin (and then the topic to talk about, ignore or replied), or to describe the essence of the proposal here.
Archon Guard wrote:
well podzarabotat
From Alera dough more than Usmanov, well, that's judging by how he treats a potential source of Finance, that you are not interested. Although the identity is already tired of hauling the loot - soap projects are often in worse condition than D2 here. So my version still looks unique.
Grablin stupid idea, given that walking a few strains have been ill one, apanese second :D Better wigs now, a wipe will not happen!
Guys, explain me one thing - how Pehe can earn even a penny with D2? In my opinion, the money for the electricity come from unless from crap advertising on the forum
the followers of the cult of dirty pieces of paper can't grasp that someone might not try anything to earn on other
firkax wrote:
the followers of the cult of dirty pieces of paper can't grasp that someone might not try anything to earn on other
Your opinion is generally useless. You're just doing that to protect the admin EVERYWHERE. While it is obviously not perfect, to put it mildly.
firkax wrote:
the followers of the cult of dirty pieces of paper can't grasp that someone might not try anything to earn on other
Archon, you know :7 perservere There already for storage of papers allocated (no, not the one in the trend!).
ixdon
as everywhere there is a Playground and online, PG in this respect could be no worse than Facebook.