Intel Core i3 8350K
What tell about this model? This i3 test makes the previous i7 and approximately level with the i7 7700K. It is clear that for the future to take that processor a bit saskarne, but... Generally there is a budget of 2000$ (sistemnik + monitor) and the build thought to put 8700K, but looking at the review on 8350K fell off the desire to pay is 350$. Is it the right decision to save now on the CPU (almost nothing to lose) in favor of buying a more expensive or other components of the monitor in the future (a year for example) to replace 8700K or maybe some sort of 8800K or maybe even Cannonlake, as a matter of fact in the coming months to wait for a miracle from 6 or 8 core processors in games think not.i3-8350K vs. i7-7700K
PUBG i3-8350K vs. i7-7700K
Compare prices
Not doing it the previous i7 especially if to disperse them,because 4ядра current he has little now,to take a minimum of i5 8400 it is more than enough!
CrytеK wrote:
Don't go large
Go large
CrytеK wrote:
to take a minimum of i5 8400 it is more than enough!
8400 is a stump with a dull frequencies, even a locked multiplier, and six cores now no need
CrytеK
So I think to take the stump, in terms of price and quality, with the prospect of a year, then to replace on top of the processor. 8400 but this list doesn't quite fit.
N1KО
To take 4 core with a budget of 2000$ without NT the end of 2017,this taskbar. Look at downloading it in the game more than 50%,and if you get caught protsessorostroeniya game,where the download is at 100% as bf 1,appears MicroProse and podragivanija.
N1KО
N1KО wrote:
This i3 test makes the previous i7 and approximately level with the i7 7700K.
Do not go large. There are games that uses 8 cores so that there there are already games where your i3 and 60 fps will not keep. Buy now 4-core when the games move to multi-threading the top of stupidity.
MagicHero
About buying the i3 will agree, but about the fact that the game uses 8 cores...
Games that are normally able to use 8 threads quite a bit. A large part is able to work properly only with 4. And another two or three years this situation will last.
N1KО
It's a joke. Compare core i3 office, which is actively bent in games and 8700 with 6 cores / 12 threads. Just for mnogopotochnoy future. To consider the 8700 for a gaming PC, and the rest, 7700 outdated stuff, i3 / i5 4-core - office processors, which have no prospects and have already assigned them flowers. Especially with such a budget. The processor is an important component of the PC.
And as noted above MagicHero the first game in the open world, or with a good load in percent, and Your 4 cores to choke and drag the card to load, and Your got quickly come to naught.
OkGo
Yeah, rasskajet is the origin of, mafia 3, battle multiplayer, watch dogs 2, crises 3, new nfs and naked other games work great i7 ( 8 threads). 6-core processors have entered the game, and not just 4 CORES(!), and 4 cores 8 threads, will last another couple years. Intel knowingly puts on 6 cores / 12 threads. Time.