The wedding in the Church idiocy?
Max Hass Max Hass Max HassAnd the justification? The author? Are you sane? -)
Max Hass
What is this Goblin? ))
A. Soldier of Light
I the default. I was lost here. Apparently for insulting the feelings of believers.
The question was such. And sense to run to the priests to get married after the registry office?. Did God not see that in the registry office the bride and groom have consented in written and oral form?
Max Hass
The birthday of the organs recording acts of civil status (ZAGS) of the Russian Federation accepted December 18, 1917. On this day the Council of people's Commissars of the RSFSR signed a decree "On civil marriage, on children and on the keeping of books of acts of state."
In pre-revolutionary Russia there was no single persons of all faiths family code. The marriage and conduct of civil status acts were administered by the Church.
Ie in the near future when the state became secular and the religious, everything will return as before.
Spoiler
Spoilers historic churches marriage is a Church sacrament and, according to Church doctrine, in the sacrament of the bridegroom and bride, United in love and mutual consent, receive the grace and blessing of God for marriage, mutual harmony in married life, for the blessed birth of the children, multiplying the family, education of children in the Christian faith, whose ultimate goal is the salvation of all family members.
But this Ordinance does not reduce the number of divorces (approx 55%). In the USSR divorce was at times less, and the sacraments were not.
If anything, the wedding is in my opinion itself is doubtful of the reasonableness of the procedure.
Wing42
You try it Poklonskaya to say or another hrus. As said REM Lazar at a meeting with Putin. Religion is necessary today to Russia in order to fill the vacuum created after the collapse of communism. Without religion people will return to communism.
http://www.kramola.info/blogs/politika/rokovaya-oshibka-putina-kotoroy-stremyatsya-vospolzovatsya-vragi-rossii
Ryazancev wrote:
You try it Poklonskaya to say or another hrus.
It not only will not heal, but also angry. They will be offended and sue me in court. Court of the Russian Federation, undoubtedly, the fairest court in the world - those who have money and power, and justice.
Protocol10 wrote:
And sense to run to the priests to get married after the registry office?. Did God not see that in the registry office the bride and groom have consented in written and oral form?
Logically, not undermine 8) Well, let them flee to the priests every one that nothing wrong will not be the same )
Not idiocy, but a tool. Multifunctional like a Swiss knife. To make money, to find a breadwinner to extracted on the side of the children, to find support and to drown out the discomfort of realizing that you suck...for each of the participants has its blade.
The meaning of many rituals is forgotten, this is the case. Apparently, originally his goal was to limit the spread of any infection and to reduce the number of conflicts over females. Then, under this failed faith, for the strength...then the meaning is lost, and clowns remained.
I remembered the funeral, too, something like that. Loved one buried, but the road carefully sprinkled with branches of spruce. To a dead man pinned to his feet and the way home is not found...in this case arrange the funeral and say nice words 0\ What, what for...no answer, but opened.
Ryazancev
And what do you mean by that? Smeshnye pictures from the last decade, it is certainly very original (in fact not).
Gauguin
I wanted to show the fallacy of the policy on the education of religion is to enhance scientific education. Only science moves humanity forward, not religious dogmas. Even morality can be scientifically dismantled, as security for the society thing, without which the population degenerates. Even in non-material existence of consciousness (life after death) can be scientifically proven.
Ryazancev
Ryazancev wrote:
wanted to show the fallacy of the policy on the education of religion is to enhance scientific education.
In the first place to the education of religiosity. Religious culture is the primary value, and the value of the rest of the measured level of benefits to the culture.
Ryazancev wrote:
Science is what moves humanity forward
Unfortunately, not always, as shown by the experience of Enlightenment.
And Yes, what is moving forward?
Ryazancev wrote:
Even morality can be scientifically dismantled, as security for society thing
Ethics as part of religion is not a tool, it is intrinsically valuable goal.
Ryazancev wrote:
Even in non-material existence of consciousness (life after death) can be scientifically proven.
Impossible, since consciousness is not and can never be the subject of scientific study.
Protocol10 wrote:
Apparently for insulting the feelings of believers.
True believer it is impossible to insult saying - there is no God. It's like trying to insult math by saying twice two is five.
Offended build only those who are pretending to be believers. So they want to believe, but they have not, and when they continue to. believe - here they are, and start yelling about insulting the feelings of believers.
Subject:as I understand it.Who wants to run in Church or synagogue...
Spoiler
religion for down's syndrome, who can not find themselves. Freedom is the highest value
OO,urine rushed through the pipes,half of this topic will go to the banks,and the topic will be closed,infa hundreds
Spoiler
requiemmm wrote:
when you do this, arrange the funeral and say nice words
Like what?
Shadowclonejutsu wrote:
Freedom is the highest value
Well, there is freedom from conscience and honor, so that will have to clarify what you mean 8)
Ryazancev wrote:
Even morality can be scientifically dismantled, as security for the society thing, without which the population degenerates.
Lol ) as much science as the scientist in me ^_^
Gauguin wrote:
Well, only in the Church and can marry, marriage as a sacrament. Secular legal marriage for mobiles and miserable degenerates.
