Telfin_bo
Zabante it for another forum.
Pulled words out of context, where he repeatedly tried to insult me, and try to sell them as a standalone statement.
Pavel Abakumov
Repeatedly? Proof is there?
I brought evidence of his words, and you?
Telfin_bo
Handsome kid for the market to respond, saved the screenshots. But to me none of the language is not pulled, he blurted out - now let razbanivaet, if you do not know who. And cry about out of context is in the Hague court.
the first rule of communication in the black ghetto: only Niger has the right to call spade a spade, snow will fall with the valve in the skull
Well, chat moderators, there is a wonderful paragraph 5.11 of the rules by which they can do what they want without any explanation. And if there are questions to administration about this, they still have 1.6.
da ne ng parsa pod vsem budet amnistiya akkam 4at razbanyat! tut ti pravdi ne naidew a v 4ate igri i podavno!
u menya bila diskussiya s vlast imuwim i vobwem to moder mojet tebya zabanit prosto tak!!!!! razcenivae kak tvoi deistviya nepriemlemie!!!
5.11. Any controversial, vague or ambiguous language that the rules in chat are interpreted by the moderator of the chat based on their perceptions about the order
PAK-PYK
5.11. Any controversial, vague or ambiguous language that the rules in chat are interpreted by the moderator of the chat based on their perceptions about the order
I was even afraid to submit any representations on the procedure at PGNiG D2 modders are actually
Detsky babble. everyone has their own truth. the more the powers that be for the market to catch.....at one level should stand.
Shaka_podorojala wrote:
PAK-PYK
5.11. Any controversial, vague or ambiguous language that the rules in chat are interpreted by the moderator of the chat based on their perceptions about the order
I was even afraid to submit any representations on the procedure at PGNiG D2 modders are actually
From this rule it follows that if some dude trusted actions in a recent match, let them is pounding whom he pleases. Even the silent ones. All the undecideds should be first to ban - if the person does not write anything in the chat, the chat did not need him.
I think this server need such a policy of bans in the chat. More bans - more electricity.
ixdon wrote:
All the undecideds should be first to ban - if the person does not write anything in the chat, the chat did not need him.
Congratulations, you have been accepted for the position of chat moderator.
those who are offline, you also need to ban. im chat why, when they are not on the server?
I just wannabe the moderator of the chat, OFC
Torum.
he nicknamed Tits ( from titanium_man), nybrogade
ixdon
that you would perebanit not to crowed