Otsenite vybranou me the Assembly?
Experts, please tell me, how do you like the Assembly that is Rolled of the game at max speed?Or something you can replace, add? Looked approximately in the region of 1000 euros. +/- 100 Jews.
Sincerely,
RedPriestRezo
It will cost TSU in the 30-40 percent more expensive than in Ryazan 5. Graph. core - dead a poultice, to help out he will amajet only seen when you die, the rest will be idle stand. A couple shots of the valuable of € 100. Him with 4K 1080 is not shining, and for 1080p and Ryazan 5 will do.. If you play all not in what does not deny and calm for reliability, better processor with a video core , processor amd Mat.Board and RAM is more expensive. And che it to him for 4K don't Shine, already on the initial Assembly of 1080 points puts . I for one 1070-Oh QHD at 144 Hz. play and almost satisfied, if the system unit has allowed the second 1070-th set. What the fuck is with the division of litsuhi and pirates? Besides TCA in the first post is on the 500GB SSD. And again external HDD? you're from the 21st century? Game someone to wear going?. All the games to play is too expensive . Not all games will be like and to try hunting . If the game is hacked problems with the installation does not occur if only a crack for the game which it is not clear how to launch and how buggy this hat in a computer needed... disconnected and there is no problem.
Seven thousand seven hundred seventy one
750 Watt LC-Power Metatron Prophecy 3 LC8750III Modular 80+ Bronze - I think this is not worth it, if only because of the custom connectors on the cables. SAMA 750 Watt HTX-750-B7 Armor Modular 80+ Gold compared to the previous more impressive. And preferably in my view the availability of seats under fans and on the side cover too.
An__ei wrote:
reliability is better processor core
Nonsense.
An__ei wrote:
for the amd math.the fee is more expensive
Nonsense.
An__ei wrote:
RAM is more expensive
This is generally how the universe?
An__ei wrote:
All the games to play is too expensive . Not all games will be like and to try hunting . If the game is hacked problems with the installation does not occur if only a crack for the game which it is not clear how to launch and how buggy this hat in a computer needed... disconnected and there is no problem.
For God's sake, bring me this heresy, somebody, I don't understand it.
RedPriestRezo
Maybe it's some sort of parody on Klitschko. It is not clear.
MunchkiN 616
To me your build is like, I'll consider it as an option, too, can read more about the Molex adapters, etc. something I know nothing about it. And I understand 8яд risen 7 3000 mhz is not much faster 6 core risen 5 3300 mhz?
RedPriestRezo
Not for average minds , Tupi on your junk - AMD FX-6100 - price 3850 RAM RUB-4000 RUB AMD Radeon 7950 3GB-23500 RUB.
An__ei
And where does my config, and your verbal nonsense? I like be is the PS4, because PCs are not updating xD and even if I wanted to upgrade, it is clearly not now, with the dollar at 60 xD
Seven thousand seven hundred seventy one
SO! Assembly Reisen, be careful
1) This processor will behave well with dual channel RAM and a frequency of more than 3000. Take 3200 chips from Samsung. The CAS latency has no serious significance.
2) BP safely choose from 550 to 650 watts. HOWEVER(!) and 500 watts for the eyes, especially if You are going to put a second video card.
CPU 100W + graphics card 200W Mat. Board 25W + HDD / SSD 15 W, petty periphery 50 watts. A Total Of 400 Watts. and + 100 watts on stock. Safely take 500 watts and no one is listening. Under SLI 650-700 watts is more than enough.
3) SSD for system eye to 256 GB. Is no longer required. To put games on it is silly, wasteful goes. Even at 128GB for the eyes.
4) rayzen has long been pulled and he reached the level of 6700 from Intel. Very good and promising acquisition. In my profile there is a build in the 1600S. Happy as an elephant, pulls great.
5) Mother I put B350 Tomahawk. I recommend You replace with something better according to reviews, the ASUS PRIME B350-PLUS is not the best.
6) HAVE a BOX version of risen has a GREAT fan in the kit. It is not necessary to invent anything.
If anything is missed, please contact. view.
RedPriestRezo
Well, okay. Thanks for the sympathy. On a conventional HDD as the discomfort does not feel. The extra couple of seconds I do not make the weather. I do not see sense to overpay in 5 times for a gain of 15-20 seconds loading a level. PS 5-6 games good set and floor broom is already present :D.
CreMat0ry wrote:
5-6 good games and put a floor broom is already present :D.
In the case of SSD, put 1 game and there is no place xD
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Safely take 500 watts and no one is listening.
Dada, feel free to take 500.whatever.
Spoiler
And poher that it is in acceleration almost 400W eats xD Well, furmark, squeezing out its 224W. But you don't listen to us, take the BP 500! You will have enough. This commentator well enough as it is, and you then go.
Well, the cooler, the cooler too, no need to buy boxed everything!
Spoiler
RedPriestRezo
well I still think will stop the choice on a 650watt, let it be with the stock
Seven thousand seven hundred seventy one
The map in the dispersal of the desired stock in the power, and 500W on the box, this is the MINIMUM requirements for the PSU. Not RECOMMENDED. So feel free to take the 650, maybe the CPU then overclocking let, the seen and so with a factory overclocking.
Seven thousand seven hundred seventy one
if you compare corn 1600 and 1700 the latter at the moment in some games and can play in mind specific features of their optimisation and the fact that the challenge Drava radicals usually runs in a single thread thus after a certain number of cores-threads (approximately 8) starts to defeat the CPU with higher frequency.
so the meaning of cucuruzeni 1700 only that he knowingly many cores and it can be customized if required and proper cooling. if we talk today and compare it with what some and7 7700 or R5 1600 - it has no special meaning the next year or two
as the choice of Mat Board on the base х370 and power supply. it is just for support of SLI cross fire which can ever need but maybe not
Molex molex is a connector with 4 contacts and now a legacy format. for graphics cards, the meaning usually is that if the PSU does not have enough 6 or 8 pin direct it is in principle possible to connect an adapter, which is either sold separately or together with the card. to specified by me above the pitch this is not true as I have edited the comment, and is not advised to take the block specified under the spoiler. and other blocks like them 4х8пин that probably will be enough for 2 of any conceivable reference cards the next few generations
RedPriestRezo
7771
RedPriestRezo wrote:
And poher that it is in acceleration almost 400W eats xD Well, furmark, squeezing out its 224W. But you don't listen to us, take the BP 500! You will have enough. This commentator well enough as it is, and you then go.
What are You talking about? From the figure? This WHOLE SYSTEM is 400 watts. Take a look:
Spoiler
And do not come up here, learn to read carefully:
Spoiler
And do not tell tales here. I told 550-650 W PSU, you can safely take without thinking. 500 W recommends NVIDIA. You think there smarter than they are?
IMPORTANT!!!! VERY IMPORTANT!!! In the test configurations specified Intel Core i7-3960X 3.3 GHz, overclock to 3.9 GHz, which has a design capacity of 130 W!!!!!!!!!
Rasskajet me more stories about energopotreblenie, I am very vnimatelno listening.
1) Riesen 1600 in overclocking mode - 100 watts.
2) GTX 1080 preferens not subject to acceleration. The maximum that You attribute, it is + 50 MHz, luck + 100. From it squeezed ALL the JUICES, need DLC for overclocking. Checked. Rarely seen above 2000 figures. Moreover. tell me, WHY are You going to disperse it, and what gains you think to see? Especially on such a powerful graphics card? + 2 frame. The increase in comparison with the reference it amounted to 2-5%.
BP will be given as long as necessary. And the extra capacity of the overpayment. Although it is good, even BP will not strain, which in theory will prolong the life.
Where You the Watts, if the consumption capacity becomes smaller, and added the fan consumes 2 watts. WHERE???? Where do You store them? And also tell us how many times the system will reach 400 watts in consumption?
You know, there is a rule - the technique should work for their money, while simple excess capacity use bears NO insignificant margin, in the case of overload, more than enough.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
This WHOLE SYSTEM is 400 watts. Take a look:
The whole point of the Russian cinematic, where Saburi to measure only the consumption of some, and get a 200-400W of consumption, Raschke 200W eats the whole system to load. From the review from tomshardware measured only potreblenie PCIe lines, and lines 12\3v Mat Board. Without taking into account the rest of the periphery.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
And do not tell tales here. I told 550-650 W PSU, you can safely take without thinking.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Safely take 500 watts and no one is listening.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
GTX 1080 preferens not subject to acceleration. The maximum that You attribute, it is + 50 MHz, luck + 100.
Now let's switch to gaming under the highest overclock we could achieve with our GeForce GTX 1080 sample. Getting there required setting the power target to its 120% maximum and increasing the base clock to facilitate a 2.1 GHz GPU Boost frequency.
From the review I gave. +20% to the relics. C 1733 to 2.1, nicese 50 Hertz. (By the way hence the consumption of the acceleration (400W))
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
BP will be given as long as necessary. And the extra capacity of the overpayment. Although it is good, even BP will not strain, which in theory will prolong the life.
Bingo, the PSU will last longer if not Negrivoda, and the efficiency is always higher at 70-80% load instead of 90%.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Moreover. tell me, WHY are You going to disperse it, and what gains you think to see? Especially on such a powerful graphics card? + 2 frame. The increase in comparison with the reference it amounted to 2-5%.
Buy seen and not to disperse, it's like lying in bed with a woman, and her not to pull out.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
recommends NVIDIA. You think there smarter than they are?
I just think he's smarter than 50% of the population of this planet, because I know how to read, because on the box said NOT RECOMMENDED and the MINIMUM requirements for the PSU.
Spoiler
RedPriestRezo
And again, solid neponyatki.
RedPriestRezo wrote:
From the review from tomshardware measured only potreblenie PCIe lines
Yeah, who gives out 75 watts, not more, and is not the primary power source.
RedPriestRezo wrote:
Without taking into account the rest of the periphery
What is meant by this? fan 2 W, HDD of 8 W?
RedPriestRezo wrote:
From the review I gave. +20% to the relics. C 1733 to 2.1, nicese 50 Hertz
HAHHAHAHA! What video card is. Working MSI gaming gtx 1080 x 8g is 1960:
Spoiler
No no, I understand, apparently this 1060 / 1070, which overall, uses less power. Maybe they're talking about. I lean on 1080, which undertook to purchase the author.
And efficiency this is an old song of 400-700 W, well change in a couple percent???
RedPriestRezo wrote:
Buy seen and not to disperse
There is a word - NAFIG is NOT NECESSARY, or close, can not...
Nothing to do. And what is there gives it acceleration, in addition to serious heat dissipation? A lot of Narozhnyi and received. I'm talking about 1080, though.
RedPriestRezo wrote:
a MINIMUM recommended system power
But we must also write the MAXIMUM requirements. NO NO! Collecting table for each possible option. Put HDD + 10 W, add to BP. Set the fan, another + 2 W....
In the end, no specifics. Can stick at least for 100500 W, but the meaning is?
In short, where did Your 400 watts, THAT's CRAZY! I believe that it is the WHOLE system, because I know how to count. I have no 400 watts on the graphics card, and never was.
No, seriously, 400 W, I would go broke on electricity. As much as I played, drove none in a month (and PC I have all day), reaches the same figure, as it suggests that this figure is not as high as You paint it.
By the way, You so carefully cherish BP, while driving the graphics card. Double standards.
In short understood what and where. Unconvincing.
Good day.
8400 and that nobody advised? In tests very good percent out. Approximately at the level i7. Ryzen ahead. You can wait for the cheap motherboard and to collect for pennies system. And you can take the z370, and in the future will remain the future to upgrade to 8700к, if there is a desire.