Will the game? (Assassin's Creed: Origins)
Hi all , tell me go on the laptop with these characteristics:Diademi Intel Core i5-4200U (1.6 - 2.6 GHz)
8GB
nVidia GeForce 920M, 2 GB
Yes, as you can! Th you sistemki not see?
Minimum system requirements (720p)
OS: Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows 10 (64-bit)
CPU: Intel Core i5-2400s @ 2.5 GHz or AMD FX-6350 @ 3.9 GHz
Video card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX660 or AMD R9 270 (2048 MB VRAM with Shader Model 5.0 or better)
RAM: 6GB
Recommended system requirements (1080p)
OS: Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows 10 (64-bit)
CPU: Intel Core i7 - 3770 @ 3.5 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
Video card:: NVIDIA GeForce GTX760 or AMD R9 280X (3GB VRAM with Shader Model 5.0 or better)
RAM: 8GB
x-X-x
Here explain, what is better i5-4200U or i5-2400s?. Why in the minimum requirements of the processors range from 2.5 to 3.9 GHz? How to determine which card is more powerful GeForce 920M or GeForce GTX660. Focus on the numbers? On the letters? Not hitting, just understand the author's themes))
UnItalianoVero
At the office. the manufacturer's website:
Where it is possible to understand that the GTX 660 is much more powerful than 920m! Conclusion: video card is weak for the game!
UnItalianoVero wrote:
Here explain, what is better i5-4200U or i5-2400s?. Why in the minimum requirements of the processors range from 2.5 to 3.9 GHz? How to determine which card is more powerful GeForce 920M or GeForce GTX660. Focus on the numbers? On the letters? Not hitting, just understand the author's themes))
i5-2400s is better to have it clean and full more GHz 4 cores 4 threads, while the i5-4200U 2 cores 4 threads of purity, he little weak for modern games, the GTX 660 better than none
Lol, why will they test their cards in 3d mark? So it was not clear how the card will work in games?
Subject: no, Yubisoft, I guess they optimize the game in 2x configurations, then specify them as the minimum and recommended system requirements
D18K
And yet they have the price tag on 1080 and 1080TI in dollars is the same. Shorter left some comparative analysis.
Jacob Temple
On the inconsistency between price and quality, this is called marketing. When I came out the graphics card is the Titan X in 2015, it was worth it a thousand bucks, as they were the most powerful video card at the time. And in the following year came the 1080, is much more powerful and cheaper. The most powerful currently - Titan XP is 1200 bucks. In the table all right.
Kopilot
Who will buy the card TITAN for $ 999 if for 699$ (300$ difference) you can buy more powerful 1080. After all, if to proceed from this table that the TITAN and weaker and more expensive GeForce1080. Which by the way does not correspond to the statements (concerning power) on the official GeForce website. Conclusion, or are they all messed up the schedules and prices or they are lousy marketers.
Kopilot
Again, if Titanium (XP) is more powerful than Titan (X ) why on the NVIDIA website Titan (X ) is stated as the most powerful (see screenshot). Do not order, information needs to be updated.
Jacob Temple
Jacob Temple wrote:
Do not order, information needs to be updated.
Well, Yes, there is a problem they have, or again marketing:) Now, of course, no one would buy the Titanium X for the price. But the price of leaving the old to look at her, all ran to buy a new graphics card, which are cheaper and more powerful. Extra incentive, so to speak. IMHO.
Kopilot
To run then run. But what to do with already descended from the conveyor of the titans? They are after all also need to realize that at least something for them to help out. It would be wiser to throw the price tag adequate. And not to scare off the cost of the buyer, for the sake of good sales GeForce 1080TI.
Jacob Temple wrote:
Who will buy the card TITAN for $ 999 if for 699$ (300$ difference) you can buy more powerful 1080. After all, if to proceed from this table that the TITAN and weaker and more expensive GeForce1080. Which by the way does not correspond to the statements (concerning power) on the official GeForce website. Conclusion, or are they all messed up the schedules and prices or they are lousy marketers.
Whoever is doing the editing on CUDA, but at the same time, quite likes to play games to use the Nvidia Quadro. He will buy Titan. Titan is a medium between gaming and professional kadrey card for video/photo tasks, hence the price segment is different. Nvidia Quadro worth under 200k Rubas, but to play it you will not be able, despite the 24 Giga RAM and a whole bunch of CUDA cores.
The graphics card is not only for games need...
fatallezzz
Undoubtedly for video editing too. But we in this specific topic are discussing about the shopping card, specifically for gaming. Otherwise we would have talked about their pros and cons in the topic of Montage. Which card to choose?.
GeForce GTX 1050 ti, 12gb ram and amd fx-6300 go? Doubt only in the processor. Well, so like a new middle-earth 60 fps on medium is easy.
Go to my PC assassins creed origins?: vidyuhi GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB, 16GB RAM and 2-core Intel processor 3.20 GHz ????