Ocenie Assembly

Wrackman
I, too, and meant it.

Flokkkis wrote:
More 4 cores and 8 potoku games did not give up.
While, Yes, but to take 4 core and hope that they still will last for 3-5 years is silly.
Flokkkis wrote:
Operativka so at all. The difference between 16-32 very minimal!
Checked.
Me too, no paging file me: Andromeda flew in 15 minutes, a couple of other games showed intensive feeding at the level of 11-13 gigs, 16 gigs right now.
https://yadi.sk/i/wnyU79rV3LJxHk
https://yadi.sk/i/3kDurMV43LJxGV
https://yadi.sk/i/7zLYGfgf3MvxWV
saa0891 clearly not one year PC takes when you update you always have to lay some groundwork for the future.

saa0891
Intel Core i7 - 7700K OEM
If you have money in 7700k,it is best to take 1600x,the difference in price and the cores/threads is palpable
1600x
Spoiler
7700k
Spoiler

Geralt-47
Always berating accepted his version, the kfa2 brand is not trash but a very normal, we just have not however, like ASUS, Giga or MSI, a block with enough margin on the entire Assembly because it consumes a peak of 580w when considering overclocking. And for the future I'm not talking about the block(although given that now, the energy consumption decreases and it will be enough), but about the mother at 2066 socket.

-Anarant wrote:
2066 socket
The socket is garbage. Overheated VRM on all boards even in the drain, the wildest power consumption, the loss in games even 2011-3, not to mention 1151, due to the slow server has openly structure their inter-connections.
Want to play is 7700(K) or R5 1600, you can wait for the coffee 8700-8600. More work and less play - R7 1700. Only to work and almost never play with a good budget R9 1920-50.
2066 under any tasks, megapolise crazy grandmother who takes only a complete idiot.

Garik Nevskoy
Better yet socket 1151 is nothing for games. But if povyezhivatsya, type 4 anal of memory, lots of slots under the operational and support 8-10 adronnykh boilers, a lot of slots for some, you can look at the secondary budget 2011-v3, but I think it's a bad idea. At least better than hot 2066.

Flokkkis
There are of course AM4 (and Yes. previous 1150 the same actual). Level 6700k (same in games) and 6800k (6 cores / 12 threads). I already feel like a parrot, repeat one more time.
Why take the 7700, with the galloping temperatures, Intel acknowledged that overclocking it is not subject (Intel advises not to overclock the CPU Core i7-7700K), and even with the outdated socket, and the worst.
2011-v3, is not necessary for toys - the more he is THE SAME out of date, and 7700 (but still better than the 6700, though it is possible to disperse) will be relevant until the year 2020. 6 cores in, and now well show yourself (build it yourself 1600S + 1080 earlier, now 1060).

VOVAN WOLF
While the temperature of 65-68C in the crackdown. As I wrote, if there are troubles with tampoi, then I changed to 6700k legendary. But so far everything is OK. And now everything is in anticipation of volts! Look at what there will be hitna. What do you think about this?

VOVAN WOLF
(he collected the 1600S + 1080 earlier, now 1060).
Nothing sold 1080. She's much more powerful 1060! WHY?)))))
The percents did not pull 1080?

VOVAN WOLF
I was going to purchase Intel to take 1800x. But then he changed his mind. Is there a big difference in performance between 1800x 1600x and in games?

Flokkkis
Well, you goof, why the hell to take the 1600s? You have no head?

Well, according to the downside, local animals are not very appreciated, everything in the Assembly is fine, not an essence... That itches on the change of generations to collect system =) Coffee Lake's been here here comes that 99.9% will shownit AMD + Volta soon shoot..it's your Business, I would have left, and then wanks brands is not the most fascinating process.

Wrackman
I took 7700k. And 1600x first asked the top user. So interesting how his performance compared to 1800x.

bloomm
Volta soon shoot..
WHEN?

Wrackman
You sho a fool Cholet
I mean?

Flokkkis
Rejection from the 1600S-1800S. In fact - fellow. Games where 8 cores / 16 threads work effectively in games, show the best results. Total, the difference from 0 (here zero) to 45% reaches.
Better, for example: GTA 5 (expected), Hitman, Mafia 3. Where he relented.
But in General, the same go, and it is clear.
From AMD the problem is that you demand to RAM himself head LONG puzzled what to take, choosing between the 7600 and 1600, then 1600 between 6700 and ultimately chose the 1600S (I don't need the cooling from them, overclocking to indulge in an extreme case, set and forget, works on 3700, plus the availability of the 1600 - waiting for delivery, and the 1600S were available, never regretted that he took) as a budget option - just great. Ordered from memory, we have to pick up anything I could not, put 3200 CL14, samsonovsky chips, the word dual RAM really drags. The difference between the 4790k and the 1600S no.

Wrackman
Wrackman wrote:
Well, you goof, why the hell to take the 1600s? You have no head?
And what is it bad? I put, it works. To the idiots not realize that the processor is over 14000 level 6700k in games, but cheaper than 5000 rubles.
No, I will not argue. Not once has passed, counter-arguments enough to swear. Empty flood. While some cry, others buy in and work / play.

Wrackman
4.6

Flokkkis
Well, with the same success it was possible and 6700 to take and drive the bus.
VOVAN WOLF
Oh God I hope you drove it to 3.7?

Wrackman
6700 to take and drive the bus
At that time, was not. And the more figs you dispersed percents with no index k, at least to 4.2, not to mention the 4.6.

Wrackman
The 1600S with the plant running at 3700. To drive it is not necessary, makes no sense. Worked with 1080 EASILY.
Spoiler
Spoiler
By the way, being chased by 1600 to 3700 with no problems on boksovskie the cooler. In this case, getting 1600 guys save ANOTHER 4,000 rubles cooler + CPU).
Intel is mandatory for the CPU with thermal paste under the lid, and especially the index k, buy a good tower this as a condition.
The CPU frequency can be seen in the second screenshot.