GT 730

LightHOwUSE wrote:
...the only opportunity to play games in a fair 60 fps at least on medium-high is 980/1060...
In what resolution you've read the previous posts ?
StA1Mp wrote:
Monitor resolution 1440x900

SonyK.


In poorly optimized games under 60 fps, the resolution has very little effect on fps. I meant it like games. If the player does not require a poorly optimized game, and it collects the system for the game to 2017ого (folic 4, GTA 5, Witcher 3, Inquisition, dying light and others like them) - I said the r9 270x which is best for quality/price.

It also provides a 30 fps in poor ports. But to get 60 fps in these ports will have to just take something that is not below the gtx 1060, and settings while still roll need on any resolution.

It was about the fact that the range between the 270x and 1060 just a waste of money, because good games will roll on the first and gonopore and 1060 bend will be able to drawdown up to 30-40. And taking, let's say 950, 960, 1050, 1050ti, r9 280x, etc., the increase in the well-eroded, and is minor and GoNorth - its still not enough for comfort. Even the 970 to take makes no sense. Either take the cheap and efficient option, they either had to save up for an adequate balance in performance =)

LightHOwUSE
He has a budget of 5 - Tr- for the money it is a normal new none will not take, and judging by vyshenapisannogo...
StA1Mp wrote:
So I did the above already agreed on 1030 points
...he did not want to take used. We must not forget that his CPU...
StA1Mp wrote:
...Core 2 Duo E8500...
...as it is necessary to disperse, so he pulled a decent card ?
LightHOwUSE wrote:
...or so to save up for an adequate balance in performance
That is correct, but how much time it will save when he now...
StA1Mp wrote:
...me, and less than 16...