3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
f
firkax 30.04.20 08:12 pm

cooking for 3 runes (Diablo 2)

Let's imagine what would happen if the runes above Gul cooked not 2 and 3, as well as runes below um.
7 Comments
Sort by:
z
zorz7777 30.04.20

firkax
Nobody in their right mind not cooking above Lem

S
Sanchez Ramirez 30.04.20

Sorry. And when I just started to play, like to cook Jah or ber of lo runes. But to cook at least a Pool, it is necessary, for example, 8000 Tal, and so many stones have to do this...

K
Klassewer 30.04.20

then it would be most sensible Pravosudov farmilo.

PS Or even removed D2 xD

i
ixdon 30.04.20

Obsessed
subtly, too :)
firkax
Anything good would not.

P
PAK-PYK 30.04.20

davaite predstavim esli bi runi varilis po ne po 3 a 12!

f
firkax 30.04.20

12 nobody cooked because then it is easier to find a rune mob than to cook it from the smaller
and even 2 would have cooked very rare, if not free drones with wigs

O
Obsessed 30.04.20

redoolf, the best times in D2 there were more people because there were fewer alternatives, and communication on the Internet many was new (to the snotty delight). THEN the people would gather Enigma (cooking for 3 runes). with ~2014, he would have gone to d3/Dothan/lineage/etc (as has happened to many). there is no question, Ronsard flush the vast majority of uniques, but liszowska D2 with runes cooking for 2 many years fascinated players.

in any case, if there is Gröef sharply against the best Grandfather, people will push, but cooking (3). and charge without Grepa not a game.