NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 LP and CUDA
Just installed a NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 LP. Driver 436.48-desktop-win10-64bit-international-whql - ie newer does not happen. The entire Internet is rife with description of the characteristics of this map, which clearly indicates the presence of CUDA. However, a number of videoconverters (Freemake, Any Video Converter, Free Video Converter, Media Coder) as explicitly notify me that my hardware does not support СUDA.In connection with this contradiction the question - who is wrong and(or) maybe I have something not included, some bird is not set? Although the driver settings nothing like that provided.
And on the third hand - SIV32X claims that CUDA is, and the library is there:
NVIDIA CUDA Driver, Version 436.48 C:\WINDOWS\system32\nvcuda.dll V10.00.10011.16384
What's wrong?
Thanks in advance to all who take part in the discussion
Exilc wrote:
The entire Internet is rife with description of the characteristics of this map, which clearly indicates the presence of CUDA
The entire Internet is not necessary to watch. We must look at the manufacturer's website. There in the specifications should be. Unfortunately on the website of NVIDIA I didn't manage to find this card, but judging by its price is the most low-end, so much more, I wouldn't count on it.
Exilc wrote:
...a number of videoconverters (Freemake, Any Video Converter, Free Video Converter, Media Coder) as explicitly notify me that my hardware does not support СUDA...
Sometimes the converters don't work well with СUDA: refuse to work (at most it was, although the graphics card has support), or by encoding the obtained defects in the resulting video. If it is possible for the Converter to switch the processing to the CPU and he's not exactly weak (not will encode many times longer than the video card) - try to do so.
PS video Card, you have a really weak (in fact, the office), even my ex - bujeda (where you tried to encode a video, the code was weaker processor) had features better...
Spoiler
Yes, that's true. The machine is definitely not a game, but the graphics card was bought solely in order to be able to connect two monitors. And the processor is powerful enough to sometimes reload the video. BUT! If you have CUDA, then why not use it? And the problem is purely academic in nature, as fascinating task, which can deliver a known, albeit perverse pleasure, as the perfectionist is a pleasure bringing the environment into an ordered state. To bring the world in line with its vision of how it should be. It's as if the video card has sent me a challenge which I want to respond in a dignified manner :)
Exilc wrote:
If you have CUDA, then why not use it?
Yes use is possible, whether the sense from him on the office graphics card.
Exilc wrote:
...a CPU powerful enough to sometimes reload the video. BUT! If you have CUDA, then why not use it?...
If a CPU more powerful graphics card: encode only it makes no sense. Now, if the program has a joint coding: CPU + CUDA with vidyuhi - to accelerate the most.
...the problem is purely academic in nature, as fascinating task, which can deliver a known, albeit perverted pleasure...
Spoiler
Well, a dream come true idiot. I believe that the topic can be closed.
As it turned out, MediaCoder + to play around with the settings (Encoder - CUDA encoder) + a few more birds to put in and eventually a fivefold increase in the speed of transcoding.
Thank you to all who took part in the discussion.