Drop runes cut? (Diablo 2)
This situation, with reset of the carrier itself paravozov a couple a day, and fell steadily gul|vex. Since about a week ago one falls crap, Gul had not seen for a week and 3 days to even pul Helle fell. You can certainly say all random things, but that obviously spent like 30 wigs for the week, the whole chest is littered with hel dol. The server and baregrep, and even worse you doing? Ostanovites, all desire to play beats when there is no opportunity to participate in a tradekot-stargazer
I know that there are all sorts of cheaters with prog ... or play with those who do not cheat.
The fact of the matter is that I'm not a masochist.
so you also use
VFR from me does not stick.
And on the subject. I was there the Persians, but surfaced because of the inactive condition. But in open tournaments there are some ignorant play. Will play a duel and start to play with the other, then after a time again want to play with me when I run with the third. Ng cadres are less common. Hard to explain, a different mentality chtoli.
The privates I am not very good like to run. Just love to come in and play.
Guys. You his whining alone makes it worse. Falls from HF and falls. Additionally, spend a couple of wigs and you will be happy. Well here is one negotov something. You are evil.
flud o trone wrote:
So it's not about promises, but about honesty. 1/11 - it's a fair chance the original drop. Twisted - dishonest, yet logical. It seems you lead the conversation in another direction.
Not a substitute for the concept. Honesty is when you cheat, and cheating is not here. And the original is a relative term. In fact, the original runes from HF did not droplist (and had no runes).
But changes in mechanics occur from time to time, Yes. If you all will call them dirty otkruchivaniem, you protest against the presence of runes in General and of Asa, the druid and 5 of the act in the game against synergy and mass immunity mobs to Helle, against non-class skill bonuses like the Enigma and CTA, and more.
flud o trone wrote:
It is officially allowed.
Yes, you have double standards. About the chances of it officially was. But in the original, in almost any sense of the word, the Windows were prohibited.
flud o trone, again bored arguing with a bot? ) you do not understand that the transformation of KL to the airport, and dopily (such as drop mules) here is the essence of the work of Artists of the same level. and you have the audacity to argue Cervi. ;D
firkax wrote:
But in the original, in almost any sense of the word, the Windows were prohibited.
It was forbidden more than 4 Windows on the server from the same IP. And only in +. Buy key and support developer.
firkax wrote:
And the original is a relative term. In fact, the original runes from HF did not droplist (and had no runes).
But changes in mechanics occur from time to time, Yes. If you all will call them dirty otkruchivaniem, you protest against the presence of runes in General and of Asa, the druid and 5 of the act in the game against synergy and mass immunity mobs to Helle, against non-class skill bonuses like the Enigma and CTA, and more.
If you're talking about the envelope the developers are not idiots was far. And supposedly doesn't know a hammer llrc 20 to hang (would have cut wigs with root) is currently opinion.
flud o trone wrote:
Seems to be a substitution of concepts involved, it's just you, and the rest of it is clear that we are talking about Diablo LOD and drop RUNES from hf.
Don't be ridiculous. You tried to come up with some justification for his whining but in the end of this quoted phrase is merged, for all came down to want more runes from HF.
flud o trone wrote:
Original about Diablo 2 LOD is not a relative concept - it is (Oh God!) the original Diablo 2 LOD game this is.
So what is this water again? Diablo 2 LOD began with the release of blizzami patch 1.07. OK there has been as a druid, but there were no synergies and enigm. What are you not protesting against them?
Well the answer of course is obvious - you want the chest Jakov with HF, and only protest against that which hinders this achievement. Do you have another version?
flud o trone wrote:
Do not run more than one single copy of the licensed games. To purchase the licenses was not forbidden.
Do not run more than one copy of the game on one computer. The game has a check to prevent this from happening, and is it only forbidden cheat. Licenses nothing to do with it.
Klassewer wrote:
It was forbidden more than 4 Windows on the server from the same IP.
And here ip? This is a technical limitation liszowska servers, not the game. A limitation of the game - you can't run the game if one window is already open. The legal limit liszowska servers specified in their user agreement - banned one person (the offer contract is concluded with the person, not the keys) to organize more than one simultaneous connection to bossowski servers by any means. The fact that all sorts of clever citaci evade both constraints, using the imperfection of the control over their observance - things will not change.
Klassewer wrote:
If you're talking about the envelope
No, I mean that innovations always was, but fluoro protesting against one particular, nothing stands out among the rest.
flud o trone wrote:
Because these changes were made by the developers of the game,
It remains to determine what the developers of the game. I'm pretty sure you would not protest against raising drop runes for example blizzov. Meanwhile, those who invented it - no more game developers than those who fixed HF. Priority here only Blizzard North, disbanded somewhere in 2005.
firkax wrote:
agreement is concluded with the person, not the keys
They always leave loopholes for you to pribanjci. What kind of Treaty compliance through the Internet in General can be discussed.
firkax wrote:
No, I mean that innovations always was, but fluoro protesting against one particular, nothing stands out among the rest.
You just tell me - PG is a mod with lots of changes and the admin never cared about the opinion of players because they can easily ignore and people will not go away. )
flud o trone wrote:
The main way to combat this is controlled by random, when the probability of obtaining object grows feigned time.
incidentally is it about wigs campaign ). I know them and drove OFE )).
EDIT:
flud o trone wrote:
And you fact. After Brevik development was led by Rick Seys (Lord de SEIS is named after him), and he was the main programmer of Diablo 2 since the beginning of the development.
and this is on misinfo looks like.
you have not realized, FERC heats for alera, for every word he can find his own, is a simple game for those who are in it understand
Klassewer
At desire it is possible to say that the patch 1.01 is a mod to patch 1.00, 1.02 patch is a mod for patch 1.01, etc. If you use the word fashion in this sense, it applies to all versions of the game except the very first patch, and of course to PG too.
But it just so happened that the usual mod call something unbalanced, the resulting as a result of someone else's exercise in editing mpq files of the game, with a bunch of ostentatious differences just to show and so I know how to do, or as the result of someone else's boundless imagination. In the end, the word mod has acquired a negative connotation, and in this sense it PG it no longer applies.
firkax wrote:
At desire it is possible to say that the patch 1.01 is a mod to patch 1.00, 1.02 patch is a mod for patch 1.01, etc.
OFC not, by this logic, LOD is not a Supplement and the mod, but this is nonsense.
firkax wrote:
In the end, the word mod has acquired a negative connotation, and in this sense it PG it no longer applies.
sho Maemo the Maemo
What has released off first time I modded in any way can not be. PG mod is because there are some changes with them quite a lot. For example, would state that on the server 1.11 net worth - then we would talk about fashion was not
Mod - modification. Off developed exclusively correct. It's 2 different concepts.
firkax
no, you're confusing an electrician with the train. Patch is released by the developer of the original program. The mod that released anyone else.
I understand why FERC denies that PG is his mod - mods usually make for players - fixes crashes, adds content.
And PG - antimode, it adds lag, crashes and suffering, I suspect that FERC just commented out some lines and deleted a few files when doing pgny D2.
Figs with it, with drop runes, indestructible clone, torami with dual stats, but the departure of the Persian game as lammerton Creator can not be named.
I'll put my 5 cents.
The participants of the discussion do not realize that in fact they dispute is not about what word is correct to call what was changed by the admins of ng. A debate about the aesthetics change: what flavor feel what has been done in the way that made and as filed. If a person has taste, his work will read other holders of taste as having aesthetic value.
Neosoznanna and unexpressed thought of some participants of the discussion: changes in the PG is so tasteless that it causes bewilderment and disgust.
I'll put my 5 cents.
FIRC YEARS (ll!) forcing players discussion of terminology, avoiding direct answers to questions. meanwhile, changes in the PG (see above ^).