The best faction in YOUR opinion. (Rome: Total War)
example:Alemany. strong infantry +berseker
In BI and RTV not the strongest of the factions, each faction advantages and disadvantages of studying which can learn to conquer all other countries:)
the best position in the beginning of the Celts. capture 2 cities on the Roman island and the British Isles your then of course there is a new faction of the Romano-British. they also quenched, and all you are the master of the Islands. nobody will come. even if come it did not go away
the best position in the beginning of the Celts. capture 2 cities on the Roman island and the British Isles your then of course there is a new faction of the Romano-British. they also quenched, and all you are the master of the Islands. nobody will come. even if come it did not go away
The Romans East. Legionnaires, archers and a good cava. and difficulties we are not afraid).
Powerful Eastern
Infantry: legionaries, archers.
Cavalry:heavy+archers+camels
Artillery: mobile ballista(^^^) well, everything else.
- a bit weak spearmen.
I agree with Andrew, cataphract_an
But my choice is Western.
Infantry: legionaries, pikemen(system wall), stealth units(a unique opportunity).
Artillery:mobile ballista(^^^) well, everything else.
Cavalry: ....on account of the Sarmatian not sure, maybe she's stronger than the cavalry of other countries in its class(will add later).
Weaknesses :archers and heavy cavalry(Eastern worse not speaking for others...)
Last year I took the company over Saxons - very much I liked them.and for a long time have not played a Bar inv.now playing for francs - very much even anything.cool units.although the particular diversity either.still undecided with throwing axes.but I think soon will be.during the siege of the Saxons it was easier.the Saxons don't run.and these run and run from the enemy - reminiscent of Rome's original Eastern infantry.in short I came to the conclusion to take the city better in the battle than in the manual.and loss less and no defeats.
I really liked the Franks - the Romans rest.this flexible and comfortable army from them.against the lancers and troops with a weak defense you can use throwing axes - all of their demolished easily.such as Berserkers or dogs kulana - axes nearly half of them will carry.for quick and unprotected troops a cavalry powerful, but against the generals should strictly not use cavalry throwing axes in melee - you cut them otdushi.I need to capture 4 cities and the campaign will be successful:-)
And in my opinion, obviously it's - Byzantium
I. the Huge size of the country and a large number of provinces
II. The strategic position guarantees that you will not have to endure more than others
III. Even Christianity, even paganism - the two most common religion than Zoroastrianism from the Sassanid
IV. Legionaries, archers, battle-worthy cavalry and artillery
And I most Saxons liked. For them only was the campaign for the others somehow did not work, more in the original play.
Franks as written in the description very light.
More like behold, well, just Suite the army, but .... this is a travesty, the money immediately minus 10 000, the army just anything, with the uprising understood Goths came on the horizon, the vandals and the Huns scratch, well then fucking do when in the presence of only one army.
The Alamanni is the most powerful and cheap army. In the field, up to 3 stacks of nomads to believe you can! These dirty blue will eat the entire Western Empire and not choke. I think it is realistic to take the entire map.