Is there a great sense of the overpayment?
In General, I think what percent you buy, Ryazan 3600 for almost 13k or 1600 for almost 6K. Like the first performance in games by about 20-30 percent more but the 7K overpaymentSerega666's
Take r 5 2600 the difference in price is almost minimal.
Spoiler
Spoiler
And the money saved will buy something else with the PC.
Serega666's
The map in pair what is your GTX 770? If Yes, then you don't need 3600. And generally write an Assembly where you percent buy, BP, mother...
Serega666's
What a vidyuhi?
Below 2060 5700 or take 1600.
Overclocking it to 4 GHz (and this level any stone takes) And you will have all happiness.
1600 took on Ali for the 5T. p., a + klad gammax 400 ( could be easier to take) for a 1.3 Tr . Overclocking to 3.9 .
In conjunction with the rx 580 and that's a lot.
Within a few years will replace the gpu and upgrade the cpu to 3600/3700 , or , if there is no change of socket and enough b450, up to 4600.
Now I do not see sense to overpay 8T. p. for 3600 .
Serega666's
My advice podnakopit and take it to 3600 in a year will change the map and you will have topology ligament, and in a year you and the CPU and card will have to be changed, I have my 1600 in the spring where that will change, if the edge already and now 2600, but don't take 1600 in October 19года, IMHO.
Dako7
Yes, it's not Finance, I and i9 9900k can take only why? I have a question in expediency) will Not say that I'm greedy or avaricious person just like the extra 7K on something else useful to spend.
Dako7
You say change the map, and that the change in 1080? If only rtx 2080 probably
Serega666's wrote:
I 9900k i7 can only take what? I have a question in expediency)
Take sonal. 
Serega666's
What kind of stupid question? Of course to take only 3600.
Will tell You so. Riesen 3600 for many reasons much better 1600/2600.
a) Large cache memory 3600, which negates problems with the memory controller and high latency, and does not require high frequency RAM. the difference between 3200 and 3600 bit. Enough to buy a 3000 or 3200 C15 C16.
b) Performance per core. If rayzen 1600 shows results even worse than the 3570, Riesen 3600 where at least reach stock values, 8700 (not k). With regards to the total, the gap between the 3600 and 1600 greatly increased and is on the flow of 20-25, a total of more than 20%. That makes 3600 the preferred solution, and productive for all games.
C) the New process technology and architecture. Support for updates and the relevance of the processor. Lower power consumption and heat.
In the end, based on the foregoing, 3600 worth of tools and will certainly appreciate the performance and gaming performance, especially indicators of smoothness, the minimum FPS, where previously 1700 / 1600 suffered greatly because of the memory controller. Attempt in represa was to improve it, but as you can see failed. The attempt to increase the cache to 40 megs markedly raised him in the eyes of gamers.
My answer, definitely for games to take 3600. It is worth the Money. I replaced my 1600, as the risen 1 I was not happy with performance and performance, including smoothness.
So you want to be sure, and junk is not going to.
Riesen Зен1 and refresh just terrible in performance, but because of the infamous memory controller and bus, in a compartment, makes it problematic. There the RAM to kick out you need. I have a very bad indicators of smoothness in games. Friezes felt. Tortured with him - to disperse (and it's the same problem 4000 is not taken, most only work on the 3800, and with a high and dangerous voltage to 1.4, 1.4 above 4000 already have to put).
So, don't listen to anyone and take safely a novelty, pleases everybody, even against 2700Х, 3600 to stream, play and work.
Riesen 1600 old fierce, he's on the processor level in 2012. Refre still trying with Hasholom to compete, but even in acceleration it is not able to wrest the championship, particularly disappointing performance on flow in games, suffered a Stalker, Stellaris.
If anything, the most the top games not 9900, and 9700k. Retrieved on personal experience and debates, comparisons. Excellent processor.
He would have taken 3600 =) But bought before 2700x (which was at 40.e. more) :( the kit I bought B450 Tomahawk. Had to suffer, as it turned out my gtx780 does not run on PCI Express 3.0. And indeed apparently the whole 700 series
Serega666's
And rightly so. A very popular CPU and praised his performance. Glad if could help You.
Bye and good luck!
CreMat0ry
Then change to refresh some sort of 4700Х. Excellent will increase.
And very strange, PCI Express X16 slot is a universal slot of the motherboard. His version should not affect the launch of the graphics card, except the trimmed bus of the graphics card on the similarity RX460, with bark at the time to suffer notably. It's weird to gtx 780 problems.
Funny, I opened the page the gtx 780 and specifications - PCI-E 16x 3.0. You have exactly 780 graphics card, not patched 460-traveler? I remember that the introduction of the 3.0 became in 2012 / 2013. 2013 series 700-th.
Given that, 3600, better\faster around 1600-2600. If you need here and now with very little eye to the future, then of course 3600. Moreover, to 1080. If there is no money, any. Well, not exactly 1600 with Alika for R. 6T.
Dako7 wrote:
My advice podnakopit and take it to 3600 in a year will change the map and you will have topology ligament, and in a year you and the CPU and card will have to be changed, I have my 1600 in the spring where that will change, if the edge already and now 2600, but don't take 1600 in October 19года, IMHO.
th for the victim marketing ,change hardware every year) the guys who took the i7 2600k 8 years ago now quietly laughing on the sidelines and him another couple of years will certainly suffice until a new Curling iron ,but there is also 980ti 4 of the hole which pulls everything on ultra in full HD
and his 1080,which for the eyes
SPR1GGAN
One quiet sitting. Do not lie or talk about what you do not know. I changed the 2600 to 7700, and the difference with modern graphics cards is palpable. Now I took the CPU under PS5, but with the 1070 no difference between 3700 and 7700.
Lookaheadmatch
780 from Gigabyte. Here is a topic about this https://community.amd.com/thread/228819 Perhaps it is only 2700X this problem
callmegod
well, not if YOU changed it is same rate yeah,even so to lie and gauvreau do not know,is not what a shame will sink to fork out 100k to build it and see the post that was pointless ,and after 2 years again for the update ,while the rest will only go down from 2600
and the majority sits on I5 and 1060 according to the statistics of steam
but the 2600 and 3770 is now calm enough to play any modern game on lotro in full HD with 60+frames and in bolshintsvo and 100+,it is sitting quietly on the MDM I wrote above .