Everything is relative
And you know, our PG is not so bad.Why?
Because everything is relative.
Just recently came across a comment mentioning such a thing as karma. And immediately I remembered how some time ago I had a... shall we say, a dubious pleasure to visit (thank God, not for long) one of these same GHGs gaming sites (not specifically indicate the names, because - fuck them!!!, not the free advertising). And there was built a very sly system of self-regulation of relations between users. I suspect that they are not alone in this, surely, a similar system are welcome and on other sites.
Its essence is simple - the so-called system of obtaining karma, both negative and positive. All of us are familiar the pros and cons are summarized and one of them ,in fact, formed the karma of each individual user. More minuses - and your karma is already negative, more benefits - and you are clean, pleasant and fragrant like an angel of unearthly (positive).
Well, fuck you? you may ask - what's the difference what place this very karma to make sho a plus or a minus? What is the trick, where the dog is buried?
...Necessary clarification - when the accumulation of a certain number of disadvantages - the negative karma, the user first loses the right to evaluate other functions (plus or minus it is not available), then as you accumulate more negative karma, he is deprived of the opportunity to leave their comments and create their own threads (could be something else, I don't know, so deeply do not dive). Like a monkey in a space - look out the window, and the buttons don't pull. A sort of ban, ostensibly derived from the people.
To remedy the situation, improving your karma, you - receiving the same, well familiar to us the pros. In theory... But, as you know, not being able to comment something,this would be very difficult. Vicious circle - or a monkey or new ACC (which rules, by the way, not banned). I believe that bots there like dogs nerezannyh...
Positive karma has its own rewards (unfortunately unknown to me), one of the most important of which enhances the power of your plus or minus sign, making it equal to the value of two -, three-or more site users. For example - we all know monococoate car Games a few of its downsides could easily send to hell (transient space), half of the population PG.
What is it? Good or bad? And most importantly, what does our PG and why it is not so bad?
Answer.
Each website has its own rules, breaking which, the user is sent to the bath - everything is easy and simple.
But...
NG all the users having and not having huge amounts of pluses or minuses are equal. They can't deny the right of another user to Express his opinion just because he doesn't like (------). Any holder of NG is proud to wear it, sprinkling all his bile, nonsense... whatever. The main thing that it did not violate established rules on the website.
That is, the law punishes, not a group vysokoosmotichnyh otputovali mates.
The sites marked above, the system of karma such equality between the users in sight can not be. There is always the opinion or evaluations that are inconsistent, or simply not pleasant to someone. And having a long plus, you can influence those who have the most plus less or even (God forbid) negative.
Add to this such a thing as bullying of schooling and the desire to poison don't seem uncomfortable in something, it may be unpleasant...but law-abiding users of the site.
Moreover, a receiving portion minuses from the elders, do not start to write what they really think (well, he did not like the Witcher), and that will bring him advantages, and preferably more, so that in the future, increasing the value of your karma to Lord it over others...
Of course, perhaps, to some extent, exaggerate and exaggerate. Can be... Not for me to judge.
However, in light of the above, our PG is not so bad, although it has its drawbacks. But as they say, nothing in this world is imperfect, at least we at PG anyone can bombard their pearls indefinitely, as long as does not violate the rules...
My spoiler... and then dashed. If anyone falls asleep, then citajuci my writings - sorry.
Peace people.
Techoporn
Techoporn wrote:you know how much PG? 2? 3 years? and I've known him for 11 years.
You're a grandfather?
Techoporn wrote:
Used to be much better. Previously everything was better.
Yeah,..
Spoiler...thicker, harder and longer.Again the old song about the main thing...
Vanya Rygalov
For good, their pros and cons, would have to be justified.
Well, like, koment liked or not liked because-and-so.
To realize it's not difficult, but to check out every plus and minus of the moderators (who, by the way deep shit on the website), it is practically impossible.
I am the way, sometimes flipping through the forum on the phone can accidentally get a finger in the plus or minus was expecting, and not even notice. Because he to these figures the attention, not pay any.
System pros/cons on the website completely irrelevant.
+/- are absolutely from the bulldozer and herds so chaotic that sometimes I get the feeling if it has an automatic program to cheat.
If your comments minusanul or put people 3 you can be almost sure that the others will continue to increase.
Often less fanboi platform or a specific game.
The dialogue is natural, nobody is, etc.
Techoporn wrote:
and I've known him for 11 years.
You're a beginner. And if not, then why create a new profile?
PG rules the website though with their tachibanaki, but there is no dull environment, like on most other gaming sites.
By the way, we are not talking about the website starting from S?, I haven't been, as it came a year and a half ago, probably on my ACC which was recorded back in 2010, so he was rejoining, and it was -14.43 and banned, because I wrote in the news that I was the first), there was a time when it was fashionable, right now looked at my post -197.
Vanya Rygalov
That is, it is still the trend of gaming sites? about karma and reputation.
In fact, every website is a reflection of the real society of men, where set its own rules and laws. Accordingly, the behavior of users on various websites (forums, social networks, etc.) are different. By the way, this is where bydloforumy and even bilocate (at least one of them is familiar to many). Ie users adequate with such resources, take turns and that it turns out, is the herd. As in real life, in the place where there is no development, no infrastructure and conditions for normal life, the population is washed out, but remain in the bulk, the marginal personality.
Regarding Internet. Who is to blame?
Clearly the administration and moderators who set the rules.
Well, people also interested to pump their Persians. So with the profiles on the sites. Farm pros to get all sorts of buns.
Ivan from Facebook arrived. In the old days social media was not particularly well developed. Even touch technology was not very developed.
It was different.
Vanya Rygalov wrote:
NG all the users having and not having huge amounts of pluses or minuses are equal. They can't deny the right of another user to Express his opinion just because he doesn't like (------).
As a true democracy and when there are no elites )) Like.. somehow. Normally, approve of this. There is a ratings expert on the games, although the ratings system is terribly simplified (this was and still dissenting).
In short, the karma on the website is not needed, it is in real life and some video games like Fallout =]
Vanya Rygalov wrote:
Moreover, a receiving portion minuses from the elders, do not start to write what they really think (well, he did not like the Witcher), and that will bring him advantages, and preferably more, so that in the future, increasing the value of your karma to Lord it over others...
It defeats the very concept of karma, by the way. When the motive is selfish, karma in the real world decreases. Described by you system of karma on the website is not what could be called karma (that is not karma - substitution of concepts). For karma is not determined by the subject (member of society), it is not trust rating or something ) It is something higher, intangible, not directly tangible...
Kirlusha wrote:
For good, their pros and cons, would have to be justified.
One year ago the topic of suggestions for improving the site I was offered the opportunity to leave a little message to post on the forum. Like a mini-spoiler for every post that you think the users on this post without having to write a new post in this thread. Thus, for example, if the topic is closed, you still could be left message under the post any )
nikita2112 wrote:
Farm pros to get all sorts of buns.
Well, for example, when some users of the fruit of the blogs as a dumping ground for cockroaches =]
The author does an excellent theme, and very much right. Also wanted to write about it, but to create a separate topic not solved, all waiting for a pretext, this is it.
I used to sit on the website YouTube, to me there is, in principle, all liked it, especially the reviews of games that I still only there and read the opinion of there writers reviews as that coincides more with mine than here. Well, view the video there as the fresher player works and everything loads in high resolution.
But as for the review, it is PPC. complete, as I there accounts changed I do not remember. Then I accidentally found this website, then the reputation system is much softer, so I have long on this website even sit and had no idea that here, too, because of the deep minus may be banned.
And Stopgame in this respect, all very bad. Initially, a person's reputation 0, get cons, reputation goes negative 1,2,3, etc. somewhere after the -7 seems already you can't leave comments. Get the pros, you leave in plus 1,2,3, etc.
And that would be to plus the need to write, not to have an opinion different from the rest and go for the stupid herd. Here's an example left Shadow of Mordor. All foaming at the mouth screaming that it is a masterpiece, a breakthrough in the gaming industry and all super mega game. And as for me it is a stupid banal rubilovka, with the primitive story and niochemnye combat system and better I again the Witcher 3 pass than be in this shit play.
For this I just get a bunch of cons, because most of this game is like. In the end, a couple three such comments, opinions different from the majority and I already can not write.
So you need to write what the mass wants to hear. And they almost all do on the site almost one lasoopso. In the end, the same people write one thing, then the wind will change and the same person write both.
I do believe that console crap, PC is the best, just not in the buckets sit, and invest money in it if you love the game and a little bit to understand the hardware and system. I believe that the Witcher 3 is a masterpiece, these games come out every 7-10 years. And Mordor is the shit for school and wood people who need only roundnose rumble and nothing else, and the second part will be the same garbage as the first.
That's what I catch there are disadvantages, but these disadvantages can't hurt me and I will continue to quietly write, so that's why I sit here.
But when one person with a high rating can one downside to replace one hundred and minuses of ordinary people, is generally a separate topic. Not pleased by the comments the fan of Spud's writing this shit, and some dude with a high rating who all his life she plays offended, put a minus, and you figure that I will write more. Me there so one person zaminusili, I even plus minus in from deep and got to do nothing.
I've been writing about this site because I just sat there, maybe someone knows some sites like that.