The darkness II - review and version (PC vs PS1) (Darkstone)

Homefront.
Classic hack&slash action RPG in the third person, similar to Diablo 2 and Dungeon Siege. Top-down view, not isometric, the camera rotates around the character, you can change the camera mode and increase the distance to the character. Overall, a great game worthy to be in your RPG collection ))

Weapons have a level of damage, meaning they can break if they are not repaired. While magic is infinite, and if the character learned the spell from him forever, just the mana needed.
A classic selection of three types of soldiers: swordsman, Archer and mage. The game has added a fourth type: the monk, combining elements of a swordsman and a mage. Consequently, swords for swordsman (warrior), bows for the Archer (thief), and spells/staves for mages. Nothing unusual, in many respects quite standard selection of combat and leveling.
Melee can learn spells to increase magic, but to a certain limit, the main thing for him to learn a set of the most useful spells (call of town portal, for example)...

The game has a feature that makes it less boring and allows you to pass it again, again and again. Replayability StarCraft at the highest level: for each new pass are generated quests and dungeons at random (or select from a list of choices), so each story will be different from the previous one. This is a definite plus for the game. But in the PC version and PS1, there are significant differences...

Two main versions of StarCraft: for pitch and for PS1.
Question: which version is best? Interesting?
Consider both versions, although I started playing the PS1 version of StarCraft and only then saw pitch version. Assess from the point of view of the year of release.

PS1 version.
Graphics: 8/10
The plot: 7/10
Gameplay: 7/10
Control: 7/10
Replayability: 8/10
Total: 7

PC version.
Graphics: 8/10
Story: 6/10
Gameplay: 7/10
Control: 6/10
Replayability: 10/10
Total: 7

As you can see, despite the fact that I pitch-gamer and prefer PC, in the case of DS, both versions are equal in the end (I think), but personally I prefer the PS1 version.
The story is worse in pitch-version: in this version of DS only four of the region: Ardyl, Marghor, Omar and Serkesh. Whereas in the PS1 version twice more regions added new: Ardyl, Terrnya, Marghor, Dywahd, Omar, Mothada, Baastehl and Serkesh.
On the other hand, the story and secondary quests in the PS1 version is static, which means more replay value, as in peck's version more variations of quests, there is a random element of gameplay.
In addition, the secondary quests that a player receives in the beginning the city is only in the PC version of DS. In PS1 version there is no quests in the city, the city plays the role of the network of stores and nothing more.
Also worth noting is the difference in the money: in the PS1 version of the inventory can be worn at times more coins of gold, whereas in the PC version of every new 10000 coins is one additional cell in the inventory. And in a city the PC version has a banker, which can give custody of all the gold. Convenient as it corrects the problem of excess gold in the PC version.
Another item, which in my opinion is better in PS1 version, it's OK, but not the whole, but only part of it: menus, menu items, skills and equipment. Don't know about you, but menu in the PS1 version I like it more than pitch-version. It is prettier )

One last thing: fashion. Of course, for pitch version has the ability to make mods and skins for characters, as well as multiplayer and the ability to play the single two characters! Considering these last remarks, the peck version better. Only in some nuances PS1 version better, I guess I'm just used to it )