the choice of graphics card
my PC nowOS - Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Stone - Intel Core i5 8400, 2800MHz.
RAM - 16GB (DDR4-PC21300, 2666MHz, 2x8GB)
Video - gtx 1050 2gb
Hard - 2 1 TB Seagate
Monitor - Acer 21.5 V223HQV
is it possible to change the none gtx 1050 2gb on Palit STORMX 4096Mb GF GTX1650
lexar2018
why not, but first change the monitor on a 27 inch and it would be better to take the RTX 2060 super to play a full game with raytracing, not in stumps and ssd is also necessary to supply what is necessary
lexar2018
is it possible to change the none gtx 1050 2gb on Palit STORMX 4096Mb GF GTX1650
What's the point?
Spoiler
Dogma wrote:
RTX 2060 super to play a full game with ratnasingam,
A good joke)))))
My will I'm on my 2080ti would they cut out of the card, as normal, their support and performance will not be soon. Approximately, this level 4080-4080ti. That is, after 4 years somewhere
Example rays: See the first test. Then you can not see in this video. As can be seen VIDOS they stick to any card. But the game is not demanding. If it has so little fps, then of course the reserve power for more demanding AAA games with the rays from these cards there.
And here is a video about the Subway and also with the rays:
Right there at egodram!
Drawdown of up to 28 fps!!!!!!!!!
Dogma
To play games with full ratnasingam, need to wait for next generation cards. Now raytracing only smell it, you can, and then just a couple of games. Self-indulgence, nothing more.
STANDS of Milivoje
STANDS of Milivoje wrote:
Drawdown of up to 28 fps!!!!!!!!!
Console gamers shed a tear.
Put on high + dlss and play with ratnasingam health.
Aloska
No, rather the opposite. On the ultra, but without raytracing.
dlss as a thing. Soap texture
STANDS of Milivoje
The difference in 4K with a magnifying glass just to look at.
And for a long time did not lather.
Aloska
Yesterday I included this dlss in the same metro at 4k. Without it, the texture clearer look. Better without dlss play