The subject of relationships
Here is one item of very good quality, but a relationship no, that is, it is sold at full price. And have another item, the quality is worse, but the relationship is what it is it's sold at a discount of 50%. What will You choose: a object without relationship or relationship without an object?
Mayamenstate wrote:
What will You choose: a object without relationship or relationship without an object?
a beautiful woman that there is no possibility to screw or complete freedom to fuck anyone or anything, except for the women?
To understand what is written here, at 11 night, to cool my hot fuck or my deteriorating brain is not able to distinguish the first post from the set of letters of the Russian alphabet
Mayamenstate wrote:
There is another interpretation that the subject of the relations is that in General nafig do not need, not what you can do.
How do you as an example, copyright in relation to Internet realities? 8) Maybe its not even here, just any information can be converted into a set of ones and zeros and redirect anywhere with almost no overhead?...
MelShlemming wrote:
What? One boob went for another cover.
MelShlemming
maybe one boob put, and the other will kill
A. Soldier of Light
You're talking about something that is so encrypted are written? Or about torrents?
I told you, I myself am only in the process of understanding, as this theory I have appeared only recently. You should have seen how I have write in the file. Just one word, or phrase. The subject of relationships, in this case. And I have hundreds of these theories, and everything is recorded word or phrase. So for the average person, this file will just be a meaningless set of words. Perfect encryption.
Here is another interpretation appeared:
Work-soul-charge. It so happens that people work very long, with the soul, but makes some useless fuck in the product that in the form of services. And even discount provides. That is, the relationship is, and there is no object. And it so happens that people work very quickly, professionally (with no soul in a sense), and makes it necessary for all product or service. And discounts are not provides. That is, the subject is, and relations there.
My PC was previously the subject of relations, and then ceased to be. With regards to torrents and prices for iron with useless transcendent characteristics. Some craft beer for 400 rubles a liter began to sell by the glass. It is good that the division moved out. Some hand-soap boiling at the unrealistically high price appeared. Some sunflower oil cold hand pressed under the pressure turned up on the shelves and stands so sickly. Let's really and bread sell for 100 rubles a loaf of bread from flour, ground manually hammer from wheat collected manually with a sickle. Who the fuck is everything you need? On household chemistry and products get stuck? As well as a PC at 100 K. all Already sick of these specifications and that does not pull. When will relationships, women, sex? Take the Incentive game has become as a buy Viagra and masturbate. Ashamed. Just Viagra. Just a PC. Just cars. Just housing. Just a job. To come to Thailand to swim in the sea? It should be so. And nothing more. They we are idiots? There doesn't have to be that way. In the sea there swimming going, and in relationships. The sea in Thailand is a subject for a relationship. And not just the subject.
Mayamenstate wrote:
In the sea there swimming going, and in relationships. The sea in Thailand is a subject for a relationship.
Fuck these relationship. There are all prostitutes - transvestites.
MelShlemming
Nobody bothers to find out there women. At least they don't answer, as our that they have sex with anyone without a rubber to do, and with you only with rubber. So they aren't having sex, but only earn money. And sex with the tires they do for sex is not considered. They believe it is for the relationship. And want to have sex - so find yourself a girl. And in General, normal people do not apply here, but only Horny. In short, hrenota one.
She, as I understand the rubber, the more expensive of higher quality materials, Tu and take the object of adoration should not be beautiful, it should be soft and pliable)).
Mayamenstate
Mayamenstate wrote:
Whether engaging in anal sex with a woman to do without having oral sex with her? Of course, Yes, even necessary. Oral sex was only a prelude to anal.
Sorry, I will ignore the surreal context in which it was given this assertion, moreover, that this statement the least desirable in order to answer it, particularly cultured person...but nevertheless, I will allow you to publish some of your preferences - you have the wrong priorities. First you sounded kind of intimacy is extremely good, but for the last bloody awful.
Gauguin
Apart from the moral aspect, it must also take into account the theory of evolution, namely the aspect of adaptability of living organisms to environmental conditions. Which in turn means that when oral sex the member will be shortened to adapt to the oropharynx, and during the occupation of anal sex the member will be extended, adapting to the rectum, relative to its size, the inherent nature of the evolutionary-through the vagina.
Mayamenstate
Again sorry, but your, frankly, rather odd views on evolution are impressive - for a start I don't profess this religion. But even if professed, according to its canons - such physiological changes can leave tens of thousands of years, given the very measured speed of the evolutionary process. So, even if in addition to the first to make the second assumption that we personally care (and is not), then it to us yet does not threaten. And the third point, length is a purely socio-cultural (if the concept of cultural actually applies to this) the value of evolution as a little bit different tasks.
PS a Very strange conversation.
[relationships] = [[attitude with attitude]] +[[a relation without relation]] [[no relationship]] is [bettosini] As [relationship] can't be [bettosini] because it's a paradox, we obtain that [relationship] =[[the attitude]] ?
Follower Perelman
Follower Perelman wrote:
maybe one boob put, and the other will kill
They are soft, naturprodukt, so to speak
Mayamenstate
in a nutshell, what does the word attitude in your understanding, that you are consistently thinking everywhere and all the time. I guess that for you, Russian is not my native language and maybe that's what small-town idiom, it is not clear to native speakers of Russian.
so, relationship is....
???
Hello
This set is composed of subsets of relations with relations and without relations. Well, in a way, because only then the relations, when they are relations, relations without a relationship is bettosini. But if bettosini it's not a relationship, then the relationship is the relationship with the relationship.
Mayamenstate wrote:
And I have hundreds of these theories, and everything is recorded word or phrase. So for the average person, this file will just be a meaningless set of words. Perfect encryption.
Meaningless this encryption because to understand it, only you yourself ) That is your children or friends, for example, can not. Your descendants in a hundred years did not understand, and the point in encryption if the whole theory in your head and only there, and the text file only the title of the theory?...