9900k or ryzen 3xxx?
Do you think there now to take 9900k?That would have a space of 0.1 and 1% fps?)
9900k take definitely not worth overpays and old technology. For games and 8700k/9700k enough for the eyes, if 0.1% and 1% is that important to you. In General, Ryazan now the top in terms of price/quality.
Nameless 77
Some individuals here already 9900k games is not enough.
SuperDoom wrote:
I know quite a few guys who have even 8 cores not enough of the same 9900k.
So I think to take 3900x or 9900k
Aloska
I do not know this game where 9900k would not be enough, in my opinion, in any case, the performance hit the video card. So what you take XS depends on the task. I would neither have taken, if only the games to consider. Would 8700k, sat a few years on it, and there are already new processes).
Amd's new chips still confused in terms of what's better Intel on the chipset or the new z390 ryzen. Pci-e 4.0 is forcing you to look towards amd , Mat.the Board is kind of expensive, probably will be, as always, amd will praise only.
Aloska
Don't make the mistakes of others, if there is loot on Intel, the way AMD don't look
if about top the corn which should be top probably will be interesting but it looks like the price of 1000 dollars, and it yet was to be no normal test games as in performance per core and overall so a bunch of
finally the CPU in the future consider doline to be mandatory 16 production and auxiliary kernel-threads are highly desirable and kukurusina them like how planned 32 that is, it's more than a mote to use popular game engines in this pitch moment
MunchkiN 616
Even now the risen will be top 12 nuclear 3900x and it will cost as 9900k
So the choice between them.
Aloska
Games children gathered at 8700к@5000+DDR4 4100 MHz (all timings and subtyping) + 1080ти. For myself waiting for R9 3900X 1080 with gtx Gaming+ MSI. Because ready the entire Assembly except percent.
If the system is universal-games+work tasks, then perhaps the risen r9.
If only Games then...
Need help on kumpletuhin, write to the PM.
Ryazancev
Yes I have decided, if no frost ryzen will not, then definitely take it.
The game shows the same performance and 9900k.
77 Nameless wrote:
For games and 8700k/9700k enough for the eyes
i7-9700K - trash without the NT, it is best to buy Ryzen 3700X.
In the games current Intel Rosen will give way to blue , 8600к,8700к,9600к,9700к drag, 9400f is also a good stone reference percent for the game Assembly.
Soon new ryzen goes on sale. It makes no sense to take 9900k, until a pair of three tests. These tests at the games and not just synthetic.
BIG_CrasheR wrote:
9900 is to take only when as a gift, nothing more.
some zhirnenky gift :D
And what is the difference, will give Intel's aimlessly 9900 or 3700 or even computer mouse?
for the price that is 9900к better to take Ryazan 3900х, like promises to be fit percent, in by far р3900х will give cheek 9900к, the games can be equal, but the nurse should take on the chip 570х really is that expensive
well, the price tag with no WI-FI , Bluetooth.