Tell me on the subject of graphics card and CPU.
And it will reveal the i7 processor 2600 3.40 Ghz graphics card ASUS GeForce GTX1050Ti , 4Gb DDR5, 128bit, or you may pick up something else (Mat.Asrock h61de/s3) ?disclosure depends on the screen resolution
and Yes.
maximum card for full 1080p CHD from ESA presented information is something like 1080 or higher possible.
BAD WOLF 384
Not hardly. Need at least Intel Core i7-6950X Extreme Edition with overclocking under 5,3 - 5,4 Ghz, that would GTX1050Ti at least 70-80% load.
P. S. Sarcasm
BAD WOLF 384
or maybe pick up something else
Yes, it is better to choose something else. Rx470 and better rx480/gtx1060, if finances allow. Overpayment is small, but get a map where you can play normally. 1050 very weak.
Tell me. I want to buy two 1080( 1080ti after its release? ) under the sly to replace my 690 with a stepping stone for the future. Is that for full hd, will eventually priobretete 2k and 4K Monique. Will take out my 3930k percent of these two monsters? Or have it replaced by something more advanced?
mr. Brown90
depending on what time it is to count and depending on how dispersed the processor.
the idea is, if 1080 can now run aground in modern games, therefore, with opening of these cards should not be.
and finally there is a 4K graphics solution which would pull the game with no antialiasing with performance headroom for the +1 generation of cards. so 4K even Amud FKH will open any graphics system.
1080ти which it must be said is delayed should be comparable to the Titan in performance that is not much faster.
in full BH maybe some of the power will be in limbo 1 generation.
and since games do not see much pace CPU requirements the CPU pitch in my opinion you can expect at least another 2-3 years to install the most powerful graphics ultragroove of Gaponov and everywhere will 30фпс peck-peck