Need advice with choosing a monitor for games
There is the Viewsonic VA2038w-LED 20 which has worked faithfully for 7 or 8 years (don't remember exactly) and I want to buy something with more resolution.Experts,tell me which monitor to select the games for quality and reliability in principle, I'm leaning towards the ViewSonic, as I have a monitor of the same company and they give a guarantee for 3 years?MSI Optix MAG272 VA, 27
ViewSonic XG2705
MSI 27 Optix MAG271C 9S6-3FA61T-003
Cyrcus
Cyrcus wrote:
Optix MAG271C
144 Hz matrix VA, which is slightly worse than
Cyrcus wrote:
Optix MAG272 VA
as this 165 Hz matrix VA
Both monitors with support for FreeSync - hence to implement this feature will need a graphics card from AMD
Cyrcus wrote:
ViewSonic XG2705
It's 144 Hz LED matrix. Monitor with FreeSync.
Response time all about 1 MS.
Cyrcus wrote:
which monitor to choose for gaming quality
If you choose from these 3, it is clear that the one whose frame rate is 165 Hz. But do not forget that the graphics card needs to be the gaming segment. If you choose for games, I advise you to search among models with a TN matrix because this matrix type is the best for gaming, despite all the other shortcomings.
airstorm
Thanks for the reply...the video card I have Sapphire Radeon RX 480 Nitro+ OC W/BP (UEFI) 4GB
Cyrcus
Well ... then you'll be using their proprietary technology ;) .... although with 4 GB VRAM is not enough sensitive for some games.
Principle... if you write what price limits you can take and what size/format/resolution monitor you want, then you can look... what there is standing
airstorm
In General, I want a monitor 27-inch 144 Hz and 1920x1080 resolution price up to 20+/- thousand.
Price watch and check myself, since I don't know what and where you have a normal. Monitors have found us, then drove in Yandex, etc. have Gone:
Dream of ID... anyways ... Azusa 165 Hz, TN, 0.5 MS response!!!!!!!
Спойлерhttps://www.dns-shop.ru/product/95ab165eeaf13330/27-monitor-asus-vg278qf-90lm03p3-b02370/
I would choose him without hesitation. But there are still
You favorite Parrots , 144 Hz TN, 1ms response.
Спойлерhttps://www.dns-shop.ru/product/b104012dea2f3330/27-monitor-viewsonic-vx2758-p-mhd-vs17801/
but a little more expensive than 5 thousand, with the same frequency, the matrix and the response.
Спойлерhttps://www.dns-shop.ru/product/240efaa504a53330/27-monitor-viewsonic-xg2702-vs17019/
Well, here's a Moose pile up, on 144 Hz TN, 1ms response
Спойлерhttps://www.dns-shop.ru/product/b36a870f3b9c3330/27-monitor-aoc-g2790px/characteristics/
airstorm wrote:
models with a TN matrix because this matrix type is the best for gaming, despite all the other shortcomings.
Best for fps, not for games. The best games they were ten years ago, when according to the chart, there was no difference on what to play, then have relaly MS. Today, TN may demonstrate only a minimum level of graphics, but with more fps because there is no load on the system.
zirack
what kind of nonsense you write ,and then the FPS and type of matrix on the FPS affects only the resolution ,but it does not matrix or even diagonal
already have IPS and VA with response time 1 MS (XS how much they are real,they say that fake value ,but usually has the function on PWM ,which if really become 1 MS)
Cyrcus
Acer Nitro XV270Pbmiiprx
27-inch /1080p/ 1ms/ IPS/ 165Гц/20K rubles DNS
SPR1GGAN
Wanted to buy the Acer Nitro XV270Pbmiiprx?but in DNS when making started some troubles with paying the delivery and they cancelled the order.I took it as a warning and gave up on this store.I bought all the same https://shop.viewsonic.ru/product/XG2705.html
Cyrcus
and as you're 27 inch at 1080p? there was some discomfort and did you used?
Cyrcus
Acer a lot of diversity in price and quality.And so that was clearly a computer is included in unit of ASUS took and Monique ASUS.
SPR1GGAN
Alas...will ship only on Tuesday.But I think it would be better than 20-inch with a resolution of 1600x900:))
Cyrcus
Slightly better than 20 inches 900 p, but it is much worse than the 32 inch 4K
zirack
boy scout learn to understand and Express thoughts properly ,and then go to the forums.
1)I'm not saying you need to buy a TN ,I said that from the matrix monitor FPS in game does not change how your this nonsense:
zirack wrote:
Today, TN may demonstrate only a minimum level of graphics, but with more fps because there is no load on the system.
2)For myself now I look at Monique IPS around 20K and you won't believe ,but for the same price, there are TN and even more so that your vyser about homeless people who buy tnci misses again
In general, a continuous sell-off... Viewsonic rolled me in full (delivery on Tuesday, Monday call from the firm ... Delivery on Thursday... Call today... Next week's delivery... I sent them and eliminated the order) And now I stand before the choice ... MSI Optix MAG271R 27" or Gigabyte G27FC?
https://www.citilink.ru/catalog/computers_and_notebooks/monitors/1173794/
https://topcomputer.ru/tovary/1411794/
Cyrcus
Hello. You write that monitor you need mainly for games. Please tell me, why don't you look at 21:9 monitors? From 2560 X1080. (I have one). From myself I will say that after the monitor 21:9, all monitors 16:9 seem cropped, not enough view on the horizon. For example, I can cite the transition from 4:3 to 16:9, it's something like the same. Naturally, all people are different, but still, after I played on the monitor 21:9 back to 16:9 I will never return. I understand that if a person has decided that the monitor wants exactly 16:9, then it makes no sense to convince him. But if you are not yet fully determined, I advise you to look closely at the monitors 21:9. If necessary, I will answer questions about this resolution in games.
P.S Posons ! Who has monitors 21:9 or higher ! Let's recruit another player into our gaming fraternity! ))). You'll agree with me that you'll never want to go back to 16:9 monitors! (for games). Well, for the work of Eksel be it is not sweet ! )))
LancNoDance
Youtuber is inconvenient to watch)) and like not all games support, in the witch as an example cut video videos around the edges, but it's little things, I would not take because of more resolution and load on the card and just the habit of 16 on 9
LancNoDance
He moved to 21:9 (3440x1440) in just one week. AOC CU34G2X/BK.
Yes, in games it looks great. But not everyone is used to the format of 21:9.
IMHO, if a person saw in the case 21:9, but he did not go, it is better to remain on the usual 16:9.
SPR1GGAN
Youtuber and in fact look not so comfortable)