upgrade pc
Has this config: core 2 quad q9550 at 3.33 ghz, 8gb ddr2, gtx 650 1gb. The resolution of the monitor 1280x1024.If you should replace the video card to a gtx 660 2gb or gtx 750 2 gb? Graphics in games is not important, the main stable 30 frames. And how much such a device will last?
zont1c
msi afterburner will help you: look what depends on the performance you are interested in games, respectively, due to the fact and sags fps. Well, then everything is clear: if drawdown is not for some, then its replacement on substantially the situation will not change, although some increase should still be.
Len4ik00N
Almost all new games are uploaded 100%, but the ancient video card in some games above 20 FPS does not rise because of some
zont1c
Start with the monitor. Square 1280 by 1024 will not give any impressions of the new games, even if you stick a gtx 1080. It's just a square piece of solid soap.
Protocol10
zont1c wrote:
Graphics in games is not important, the main stable 30 frames
Read carefully. Maybe the monitor had a professional? I at the time were Philips, square, market price, he had around 50K
A3MOH
It does not matter what. Games need 16 to 9 and at least fullxd. This is the minimum to get at least some pleasure from the gameplay in the new games.
Protocol10
not, well about it agree, there's F4 without dancing with a tambourine will not run at 5:4, not necessarily 1080p, I, for one, sitting at 900p(1600x900)
Want to say that socket 775 and ддр2 already dead? You are mistaken, I think another year he will live!
Not on your Nelly not dead,I alive and well with almost the same config. Only vidyaha Radeon 7870 2 gb. And all Sehr gut ! PS. Well, the full hd resolution.
if to speak about games in General, the system is not relevant for gaming apparently does not always provide the physical run
for those games that work on this computer, upgrading your video card may give some results
but is it worth spending money
so about bakeries that might not have made the minimum system requirements of the advanced better and to forget partially
zont1c
Unfortunately,the lower the resolution,the higher the load on the CPU.To what extent the Protocol can be in terms of resolution.
zont1c
He is the most
zont1c
The socket 775 can live,but without the use of SSE4 instructions.1/4.2
What's interesting is that the old i5 /i7 LGA1156/1366 support for these instructions is
q9xxx supports SSE4.1 unlike all previous processors, but now this is not enough. In new games 4.2 is required. So I had to change my q6600 on a modern processor. Although with no less comfort played all heavy games at max speed on gtx970 in 1680*1050 resolution.
Protocol10
Protocol10 wrote:
Start with the monitor. Square 1280 by 1024 will not give any impressions of the new games, even if you stick a gtx 1080. It's just a square piece of solid soap.
5 years ago I played on this monitor (17-inch) cathode ray tube and wouldn't believe I was such a permit.
I've personally Protocol10 I wonder how YOU manage to play on some shitty 1080p resolution? when there are 4K monitors and you're still on that ancient shit.