The best movies.Your favorite...

Hmm, what a Stalker is better than The Best Movie?

He Was A Soviet...

all this is not elitism and daddy talk about anything..from kui not to do,wow friends...vodka is available for sale in the store,the wheels in pharmacies and discos..women,well here is a little more complicated,but if you work hard,you could find good for a chuckle with all of us,well actually stupid ass,what the fuck are you all sitting here?
the theme is reminiscent of the old joke with the colorful name of the last degree of demagoguery(of elitism)..this is when ilita(associate Professor prosharenye..the list is long) lies with the wife in bed and convinces her that the best soft solid...
you must understand,it's very simple-if it is soft, no Nietzsche and the Stalker will not help.

Wrong. With the film the same story as with any other art it must be for different tastes and levels. It's silly to demand that everyone watched and understood the Stalker, but in failure if all will watch only best film and neigh like horses.

So you choose an appropriate visual and the sound to your taste. Sadly, when people dredge up the past to be able to see a movie with philosophy and morality, but with poor and trivial, everyday picture. But it's good when people are watching quality cinema with an interesting live-arrangement", and which is the secondary idea, or any other spiritual vyser of the Creator. So appreciate, for example, triumph of the Will. Watch it not because of Nazi propaganda, and because of the great ideas of the operator.

porn hd for you.I don't know nauseating or sickening..interesting (not trivial) the plot never hurt anyone .Pontanulsya you're somehow not the case..if you don't understand I'm not a fan and not a admirer of Arthouse, if I cited the example of one film from this direction, it does not mean that I need to hang a label.

Bad and stupid joke, did not work. Further, Dogville this is not Arthouse, and attracts it is not the primitive idea of the animal nature of people, and approach to look at the construction of scenery and camera work.

Oh...that's where the smell of your favorite elitismo.As the saying goes..what I read..at least here pontonutsya.

What is Ponty? Sad that you think so. I gave an example that should be studied for normal and specific understanding of a particular plane of our culture. Morality? What other movie? Cinema is entertainment and delight, the minimum information maximum pleasure. To get an abundance of information, moreover, concentrated and competent - I cling to the books of the scholars. Those who are trying to learn through the movie - the sloth, which is easier to look muddy metaphors once the movie than open a thick book.

Bad and stupid joke, did not work.--the rudeness to rudeness.

Next---then began denouncing fans of Pasolini....Threw himself into the extreme..



Dogville is not an art film--how could it not?..either Yes or no..



Cinema is entertainment and delight, the minimum information maximum pleasure. --the movie is no worse than art books and also sometimes what it teaches.All too categorical you....And your edging is not the navel of the truth and reference solution to all problems...and should not give the writer or Director once again...sometimes it thinks the philosopher can come to mind and the ordinary worker...but he is not printed..alternatively movie can serve as the impetus to tackle the book.

all this is not elitism and daddy talk about anything..--you that much eating?You already about it in all the topics written....Well argued without benefit..what now..there is a desire..why not?

the rudeness to rudeness.

I this thread still not Petrosani.

how is it not?..either Yes or no..

No. The original formulation with the mainstream filling in the form the main of the dilemma and plot.

-the movie is no worse than art books and also sometimes what it teaches.All too categorical....And your edging is not the navel of the truth and reference solution to all problems...

Categorical. With hood. books almost the same story, the only difference is that the audience of such literature more fierce and chestolyubivoy. Fiction - specific aesthetics encoded in words and sentences. But for learning something it is ill. They simply have annoying cultural template in its safety interested hundreds of intellectuals, from fans of Coelho sad wise men with Kafka in his hand, society dictates a certain promise - these books are full of deep meaning and read them repeatedly develops your spirit. But this is the problem of the cultural identity of individuals, the same stereotypes are imposed and in music, for example (like the fact that classic and hard rock is supposedly good attributes and a reference flavor).
I Kant not offered in the truth to build, I just pointed out that for a detailed and solid (and solid only gives us an objective picture of) of knowing something you should not just movies to cover himself, and a certain academic literature, where this subject opens fully.

Morality? What other movie? Cinema is entertainment and delight, the minimum information maximum pleasure. To get an abundance of information, moreover, concentrated and competent - I cling to the books of the scholars.
why do you think that only black or white? Do not you think that your arguments resemble arguments buddies? -> It is foolish to demand that all watched and understood the Stalker, but in failure if all will watch only best film and neigh like horses.

Read through the posts.

Read. Are you championing the idea that a movie should only be beautiful performance. Why?

I'm talking about the people's attitude to cinema and cultural framework imposed on movies. Movie and always has a beautiful setting and just a different grade and quality. The point is that there are stubborn, who want to see staged more than it initially projected. I think a known problem among young people, yeah. All of this is erected into a dogma and passionately cultivated, leads to the fact that, begin to make fresh films with cool idea in. In fact it is so forced and ridiculous, but thanks to a strong public tradition extends to the levels of masterpieces.

Coniferous Forest
The films readily accepted than books..where the academician stated dry text..the Director is able to cause a storm of emotions..In the movie you can see and experience the Creator of the film,it might not be the worse experience of academician...Sometimes the movies affected a small household,but at the same time important issues that nobody writes a scientific thesis..in General there is still a lot of trivial, you can write...the fact is that the mere sight very few people interested..(and not a movie that already) and such a rich palette of emotions to cause not.In any case, they a role in intellectual development play anyway...



The point is that there are stubborn, who want to see staged more than it initially projected.--well, it is extreme.