Whether to take under the comp 1060 GTX 3GB?

DjDuke wrote: Yes sir, you are a lover of the choicest perversions from 10 fps to play.
Depending on what resolution to play. On 1024x768 and 550ti pulls the modern games on the ultra with 50 fps.

Metallov3r
Better take the 6Gb version. The price difference is small, but it'll last for several years. The first year do so on the ultra it will be.

SemyStall
on ultra, yeah...in 30 fps :)
1080 seats on the aisle pulls fkhd, and here speech about 1060. Mafia , Deus, quantum...

DjDuke wrote:
Yes, you sir are a lover of the choicest perversions from 10 fps to play.
Below 30 fps I had with this iron is not ProSeal, and judging by your thoughts, you consolers who thinks that bakers are changing the hardware every year and still play with lags.

WWQ
In 4K at 30 fps? And you brought 3 console gonopore.
NG is full of users who sit in 720p

Metallov3r wrote:
Below 30 fps I had with this iron is not ProSeal, and judging by your thoughts, you consolers who thinks that bakers are changing the hardware every year and still play with lags.
Look in the profile, what I have a console.

took MSI GTX 1070 , enough for gaming, used to be 960 with 2 gigs of memory is not enough ) now there is no problem

Metallov3r
To 3.8 acceleration at acceleration of the bus is that good. And at new its possible benefit in games from a large quantity of RAM.

Metallov3r
Metallov3r wrote:
should I take a 3GB GTX 1060 (power supply unit will suffice) or my percent don't get it and I just spend the money in vain?
About the processor can not survive, and about some: look at least 1060 with 6 gigs of memory. Compared to 3-gigs from it, except more RAM, and more compute units more, respectively, and performance, but in the end it all depends on the price difference and your budget.

SemyStall
in 4K you have it will explode...
I gave an example by the fact that such optimization will happen in the future.
and here is for the permissions to PCD will be the norm.

But the map is very weak. I have a 6 GB, not much better than my last gtx 770 2 gb. If you take then perhaps 1070 or 980ti
almost 2 times faster than the reference 770. something akin to the analogue 970-980й. the remaining cards in different price categories
and Yes, all 660 750 almost honorary with high fps I pitch amused. a single 680 (similar to the 770) can't pull the current without smoothing in permits from 900 to 1080p

Metallov3r, and I have a GTX 670 for 1366x768 is not enough for two gigabytes of memory. Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 was the last straw.

And here it is not about the best and expensive, but about the rationality of such a purchase. Now more and more games require four or more gigabytes of VRAM. Every year optimization is getting worse and worse, despite the fact that the graphics are not developed from 2013 year.

Look what a huge difference between the GTX 1060 1060 GTX 3Gb and 6Gb in games with high VRAM consumption:

Then the only difference will be more. Oh yeah, with three gigabytes still to freesite begin with time.


WWQ, well, actually, in 1080p on ultra less than 40 FPS anywhere, even in Mafia 3, not issue (usually close to 60 FPS). I'm about 50 benchmarks on the GTX 1060 6Gb recorded. Though, I have it under 1366x768 bought - and then it often produces a frame rate of more than GTX 1080 from a friend in Full HD.

DjDuke
>Well, Yes, Yes. Mafia 3, Quantum Break, Deus Ex: Mankind Divided, Rise of the Tomb Raider on high settings at 60 fps yeah.
I specifically wrote — "almost any game". In the category of other exceptions just get poorly optimized or technically advanced games.

WWQ
Mafia 35-60, but graphene there generally is not justified
Deus 30 fps and it's not even ultra
Kvantum I have it was 40-60 fps

Metallov3r
vidyuhi current will be a couple of years later on if you want ultra you need to buy new

killerBD1
I have a quantum x 1080 overclocked 2560х1080 was an average of 50-60, it was of course more, but less fiction.
killerBD1 wrote:
Mafia 35-60, but graphene there generally is not justified
And I like how the movie looks, I'm just far from Monica sitting in Pixley have not look and I'm good)
I do like this TTA antialiasing turned it and FSUs which settings, the picture is one and the same=)
And clarity there starting at 4-5K , but without if not playable , so I would write -
Spoiler - 4-5K
2K
-2K complex scenes.
warp 37 wrote:
and then it often produces a frame rate of more than GTX 1080 from a friend in Full HD
logically, the performance of the 1080 PCD to a greater extent depends on the rest of the system , because there everything rests on the percent.

Sub_Zero95
I bought a GTX 950 and no problems.why the hell vidyuhi for these prices?better to actually take 950 and ososki to buy.
Very funny. Rather NOT FUNNY(((( There is your vidyahu not enough! A year and a half ago I gave them 85 Grand. And you say that!

WWQ, all to the contrary rests on the CPU at lower resolutions. I have 1366x768 CPU is loaded much stronger than 1920x1080.

MunchkiN 616 wrote:
Come for console games 2010.

warp 37
If fps more, and the CPU becomes more loaded.

warp 37 wrote:
that's what I said, for 1080 ,fkhd - low resolution.