R7 360 vs GTX 750 Ti

If you need just a good average video card r7 and no issues. Love beautiful technology, like shading or fur - the 750 today. And what about the power supply do not worry :it is important to have suitable connectors and any excess eating energy body kit was not. I have 660 on 450ваттах and nothing strstrate

And overclocking is easily done manually

rockpower
Makes no sense to take these cards in current games you have even at the minimum salary will not be a stable 30 fps (in 1080p of course)

GG4
But if you put more (like 16:9), then fpsподскочит strongly, and the picture is almost unchanged.

vikpass
First not much jump in the second picture is very changed, there is no such definition. For fun run incentive in any game and change the resolution.

GG4
Yes, at first I looked to maps with the bus 256, but there prices some space

rockpower
If good graphics are not interested and may well play at 40-50 fps on medium-high settings, then minimally you need to take the 960-th with 4 gigs of VRAM. Map of course not, but will be able to give playable fps. In General, the ratio quality-price is 970-I, best in this regard, the graphics card and draws all in excellent quality.

GG4
What other definition if the monitor 1360х768?

GG4
Now, when I see some requirements in games, and know optimize and understand that the average game valaska with more or less comfort a year and a half, it's a gtx 970, and if you want everything on ultra graphics, high resolution, whistled-pirdelki, great fps from 60 and beyond, so her bundle in the sly, or titans - Matane.

GG4
If good graphics are not interested and may well play at 40-50 fps on medium-high settings, then minimally you need to take the 960-th with 4 gigs of VRAM. Map of course not, but will be able to give playable fps. In General, the ratio quality-price is 970-I, best in this regard, the graphics card and draws all in excellent quality.

Don't be ridiculous. On a 750ti on high to play. Just for this it is necessary to delve into the settings - that is not significant to disable it, in favor of higher fps. And what you said about 960 4G...you apparently do not understand computers - you simply buy an expensive iron and no steam as many do, and it is possible as I wrote, manually configure. Although, in principle, as anyone easier.

I thought too long on what to upgrade, and my gaze stopped on a 750 ti I bought and set, and sitting pretty, today's game is drawing peacefully, but not on the ultra, where we have something disabled, but very happy with the choice, so I advise!

vikpass
Love beautiful technology, like shading or fur - the 750 today.
I wouldn't count on beautiful technology, the map 750... 750 is at best stable 60 fps on medium settings. All these txaa, hbao, especially SysEx is a very different approach to iron. To keep up with technology, you need to buy X70 at least a generation. And - in our time superoptimizer when every second game is dumb even start.

PS however, the 750ti looks like a good option, again, if you forget about all duper technology, and to be content with smooth picture on medium-high in 1080p. Although, ideally for the same money to buy 7950 3gb used.

rockpower
take gtx950 or wait for lower prices in the rx480 or 460

ati123
I bought a 360)

Would be better if I bought a Gtx760, it's much stronger than 750 and 360, and is not expensive

take by far the 750ti

Wait for 950 or 1050

I had a GTX 760 to take great pulls games have

LightHOwUSE
This is despite what you need. I'm pretty good at 30fps, so the settings I bring to this level. Technology eat not so much: hbao+ - from two Jo seven frames, txaa, personally I do not use (in the control panel, for example, be less greedy settings to find). Fur just doesn't finish, Yes, with him not play.

vikpass
I agree, of course. If 30 fps is satisfied, then it is) But 2-7 frames on hbao+ can be critical for this map, if you go for a smooth 60. And sisiku for 8 years, and he - as the war in Police))