Normal it turns out the configuration and for how many years is enough?!

Without Schnike not.

Vikt0r
HAHA! I smeyus you in the face sir. When this SSD has become an indispensable component of the system?
XiptiOnS
Throw out everything, put only the SSD, without it finally can NOT!
______________________________________________
And if the case. That config is very good, enough I think for a couple of years and more accurately (but it is up to your personal requests are subject).

XiptiOnS
New games now in this config you can play on medium-high settings, but it is now. I think in a year the maximum will be the average, then throw away.

Config more than good. You can forget about an upgrade until at least 2020-2022's. Because even an average video card is enough for five or more years, and the appetites of the games/programs for small processors.

GG4
A victim of marketing. Even a GTX 950 gives ~30 FPS in games on ultra settings. You're probably one of those who every year runs for a new top, not thinking about its feasibility.

GEMORRROY that HAHA? I'm not saying that SSD is indispensable. HDD well as filopovic to use, and as a boot drive I would not put.

To replace the GTX 980 to the GTX 1060 6Gb will be fine.

warp 37
What's the difference? In performance he will not win anything, even with different amounts of memory.

Fade Baker, in games with high memory consumption, the GTX 1060 already faster (new Forza, for example). And four gigabytes isn't enough.

warp 37
Now these games quite a bit. And I don't think if he loses a few FPS in some games due to the lack of memory, it will be so critical and noticeable.

Fade Baker, Call of Duty: Black Ops 3, Rise of the Tomb Raider, DOOM, Forza Horizon 3, Deus Ex: Mankind Divided...

XiptiOnS
Your CPU of course good, but for this type of program as Archi/AutoCAD I would take a 6 core solution from Intel.
The same i7-5820K.

XiptiOnS
Graphics card: MSI GeForce GTX 980 is not necessary.
This is better.
Spoiler

warp 37 wrote:
To replace the GTX 980 to the GTX 1060 6Gb will be fine.
And what's the point? they performance almost equal to 980 but even a little faster and given the fact that Pascal is bad and usually accelerates as the saying goes out of the box" works to the maximum in contrast to the 980 the 980 overclocking will be faster everywhere 1060

A couple of years max is enough.

MagicHero wrote:
And what's the point? they performance almost equal to 980 but even a little faster and given the fact that Pascal is bad and usually accelerates as the saying goes out of the box" works to the maximum in contrast to the 980 the 980 overclocking will be faster everywhere 1060
The main difference is the memory. What would be awesome was not the chip 980ой - it will kill the low memory in the present simulations the lack of optimization.

A year later, the graphics card will no longer be relevant

In touch with people who write enough for a couple of years... Lol, this forum for 5 years - 6 enough. If you certainly not FPS - fag, or you have multiple 4K monitor on XS many inches.

I'm on i5 and gtx 670 2012. to this day comfortable play.

On the pitch (and on console) is a good Igor is still has long gone. GTA 5 and Witcher 3, posledine couple of years.

oltr
So the point is that I want to play on a good schedule. I swapped my 780 to 1070 because the old card has not attracted new games on high settings with a stable 60 frames.

MagicHero
780 on high just 60fps issue, but the game has little power

XiptiOnS
How many years is enough? Here you no one will answer this is a difficult question, it all depends on the owner, which calculates the fps at what resolution plays, settings, and what. I had a 980, at this point it is a good thing, right off the bat that with resolution of 1920x1080 playable for another couple of years. The fact that some keep higher fps at high settings above 50, the reason is simple - the difference between 30 and 50 visible to the eye, much more pleasant to play with fps above 50. If you survive to 30 and in places sacrifice settings, and will sit longer. Well I would not say that they will have to reduce much, once again, at this stage it is very playable and popular on the market. I played the Witcher with an average 45 fps on high 1920x1080.
Another problem is that some projects come with high expectations to see how some games do not stand high performance because of problems with optimization.
In General, my opinion two years, you can work with it, then you will have to sacrifice settings in favor of performance. And of course to count on optimizations, some new items for her sin. And then, how the market will develop, is usually transferred across generations, i.e. there is an opinion that will get some 1180/1170, ie 11 range. Then the increase in performance will be more significant.
For the rest, the CPU is really good, but I would prefer to pay the 4790k because it has glue under the lid, it is more effective at high temperatures, well, I guess frequency it will be higher for the same games more important value is the frequency, rather than number of cores.
Of RAM, so it would be perfect to add up to 16 GB, 8 is not enough.

There are people who do not have enough for 4k gtx 1080 (of course they can understand, as it is beyond solution and you need something much more powerful, for example SLI) Have a friend at work, who with two gtx 980TI plays all the old games and puts an insane resolution, like 8k and he like it and that's enough. Someone sitting 5-6 years on the gtx 650 at a resolution of 800 by 600 and too short! It all depends on personal preference. My vidyahu, as I thought enough for two years and he was right. Not forked then two gtx 980tI to sit more, and now I have to save money on a new SLI, so this time at 3-3.5 years was enough. Therefore, for different peck-peck gamers your preferences!