1060 or 1070
Such a question, I have a FullHD monitor, you need a card that will provide 60 fps (not less), can 1060 60 fps, or need to buy a 1070? And in whose execution it is better to take, personally at me the soul lies to MSI.GTX 1060 may be in 60 FPS at Full HD. But GTX 1070 with reserve, since every year more and more unoptimized garbage.
I think both will handle it but 1070 long enough! Selection of your business. I'm a second year sitting on the Samsung is happy as an elephant
warp 37
with ultra settings? The Witcher 3 for example with the hair to be 60 frames to give?
Eugene Astrakhan
Take a card for a year and a half, and I think it worth to pay more for 1070 if polaco 60 fps and 1060:
G. O. A. T, I have 50-60 FPS. But there the processor not very optimized, because it would be more if the card is not rested against the processor. Here is my entry:
G. O. A. T, if you take the card for a year and a half, then the GTX 1060 should be enough.
warp 37
Yes, not odd at all Varick, to 49 drawdown, okay, thank you all, I will take 1070.
warp 37
If the hair is off it seems to me the minimum fps would be like 60 times without a problem
MegaDen666, better with hair at 30 FPS than at 60 FPS without.
And so, Yes, without hair, map 70 FPS issues.
MegaDen666, so I turned on ultra settings. I better graphics and better brakes than the worst but no brakes.
GTX 1060 — ideal for Full HD and ultra settings. In an extreme case, smoothing is a simple to put, when FPS is less than 60. And enough it to you for five years or more. And the performance of the GTX 1070 need already except for the 1440p resolution.
for ultra and Fulci initial map 1080 provided that where something is is not the most resource-consuming antialiasing
and so the idea of 2 1070 with overclocking and unlikely to be somewhere below 60 fps this year
unless of course forget about the dependence on fps and CPU not support SLI in some games.
and 1060 is comparable to compare with the 970-980 they couldn't have ultra settings and 60 fps in the last year
1070 is roughly comparable to 980ти. he could not ultra and anti-aliasing alone in some games.
1080 this compares with 2 970-980 it creaked pull
if pedman 3 he in Shi 980ти he basically can't lose a map to a full CD under any official settings.
warp 37
By the way, I noticed in your VIDOS consumption of RAM over 8GB, probably still do better than 16 GB to put it, since you as I understand the textures in the page file is loaded. Although as an option you can probably put textures on high instead of ultra and the RAM consumption is normal. Visual difference between ultra and high in the Witcher no, it's clear some sort of technical burden.