Rate the Assembly

Next-gen2015
Take 2080ti and do not worry. I took and satisfied. Later changed to 3000-th series or miss. There you will see that the game will be.

LIGHTandDARK4
I don't have much money) Yes, I 2080ti still overweight, just not necessary)

LIGHTandDARK4
the minimum you need for a comfortable 2080 gaming what do you mean by comfortable gaming? 4K or what? So 2080 is the top for FullHd is not needed and redundant vidyuhi. games just of yet. So this minimum can say is that the student major)

Azaznzel
I'm not a student and not the major. I mean 4k resolution for 2080ti. As for 2080, the full hd resolution it itself is, well, you can in 2k, no more.

LIGHTandDARK4
Then what's the point about what you said about the comfort of the gaming? What difference to me would be FHD at 100 fps on 1080ti or 150 on 2080? Even visually you wouldn't see that. More like you decided to build to boast of and nobody understands you)

Azaznzel
Who brag about the Titans and what few pieces. I didn't mean it now, and what a comfortable gaming experience with perfect picture, this 4k resolution with 60 fps and above, having on Board one or two 2080ti. As for the 100 or 150 fps, then I visually see a difference even between 180 and 200 fps, and in this case even more so will be clearly noticeable difference (100/150 fps)

LIGHTandDARK4 wrote:
I visually see a difference even between 180 and 200 fps
Judging by a profile monitor, you have ASUS PA329Q that although 4K, but with the frame rate there very modestly, even hundreds there. Interesting how you can see the difference between what the monitor can't display?

LIGHTandDARK4 wrote:
Who brag about the Titans and what few pieces.
Says the person who shoves every hole 48 GB its nenonene Opera at 3333 poor people that constantly flood the video is not informative in the sections performance, a person who brags about his wretched monitor to 75Hz well, 4k is not interesting to anyone, there is no mommy millionaires as LIGHTandDARK4, people know how to earn and appreciate their work, persons who muddied the blog one of the funniest blogs on the occasion of the purchase 2080Ti for old games.
LIGHTandDARK4 wrote:
this 4k resolution with 60 fps and above
Sect 4k. A couple of people have this 4k, but in each barrel bung.
LIGHTandDARK4 wrote:
I even visually see the difference between 180 and 200 fps, and in this case, and even more so to be clearly visible
Of course, poor monitor to 75Hz will not allow us to estimate the smoothness of the picture with a higher FPS. There is in the Treasury and 8700k, which does not play at 200 frames in the same Odyssey, Watch dogs, origin comfortable in any WAY (Yes even at 100 frames!). Oh, I forgot, it's a bad game, because it does not pull PC.
Bedtime stories from Slumdog millionaire. And it has filled the whole PG.

vitalik76 wrote:How interesting you can see the difference between what the monitor can't display?
I bet he first heard about it, because: plays in 4k 60 frames. HAHAHA!

vitalik76
And what I fuck hundreds of Hertz, if my fps in this resolution for a hundred not out, that is, the map does not allow. Do I have two Titanium. Yes, even though I have 240 Hertz, the sense is, as from 60 Hz as fps in heavy games in 4k resolution varies 60-75, so I took Monique to 75 Hertz, turned on the plane and everything is OK. But, if you shut down the plane, for example to lower the settings grafone, so more and deliver less resolution, say 2k, the fps will fly for a hundred and I do in the game feel the difference of 100 and 150 fps. Other things here and there in the city.

Next-gen2015
Want forced to upgrade your computer. Normal components? Please rate. Maybe it makes sense to change something?

In the end I get this Assembly?

Dogma
Yes)

Next-gen2015
cool

LIGHTandDARK4 wrote:
I'm really in the game feel the difference of 100 and 150 fps.
To get to give the video card 150фпс making the low setting, you can only monitor this thing won't fly. He has how many, so many will remain. The difference will be visible only in beautiful pictures and the howl of the fans comp.

Please rate. The first Assembly.

• Case: GameMax G516 Asgard
• Processor: Intel Core i5 9600k 3700Mhz
• Motherboard: ASrock Pro4 z370
• Cooling: Thermaltake Riing 12 Silent Pro
• RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 16g/DDR4/2400Mhz
• HDD: 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200
• NoName SSD: 120gb
• Graphics card: GeForce GTX 1070Ti GAMING 8G
• Power supply: ATX 600W Thermaltake TRS2 S

RichardWatty
Motherboard SLAG. Better Z390 Tomahawk / MSI GAMING PLUS MPG Z390 / Z390 ASRock Extreme 4. The fee is weak and not very promising. But if only under 9600k, as the plug will go.
RAM SLAG. At least 3200, and 3600 is better to watch.
SSD can SU650.
RichardWatty wrote:
GeForce GTX 1070Ti GAMING 8G
Is it worth it? What is there for RTX? Why take the old lady.
BP of course the same slag. But I was tired to say and repeat. Like 3 year warranty, check yourself.
Generally, it is possible economically to take and iterate on. On AMD 2600, then replaced by 3600. Well, to buy on the CU.

RichardWatty
Completely.
But the memory is necessary with greater frequency to take.

VOVAN WOLF
Why do you so badly written? Well, although you're right. Especially on the motherboard.
Opera good. This frequency is easy to overclock up to three-pointers. Thus, it will save money. 3000MHZ would be enough. Why would you advise him amd when people want to Intel?
I would do it AMD disown. Was with them a great experience. God forbid this to everyone.
As for the card. And what is it bad? Overclocking comes with 1080. For full hd (medium/high settings), this card will fit.
BP, Yes, slag. That is what it is.
Percent although the i5, but six cores. In principle a good idea. Importantly, not 4 cores.

SnyperEl
SnyperEl wrote:
Opera good. This frequency is easy to overclock up to three-pointers.
Yeah, I watched. Space timings persecuting her, if you can at all.
SnyperEl wrote:
Thus, it will save money
If you take the CU, do not save much either, the price is the same. If you take the DNS, the better the modules can be found on for 8 thousand 3200, but the 3200 (C18) vs 2400 (C15).
Spoiler
SnyperEl wrote:
Why would you advise him amd when people want to Intel?
What he wants, that's his problem. Moreover, I don't see him hotelok. This is the user - RichardWatty, and it is not his topic initially. Do not confuse here the Persians.
SnyperEl wrote:
I would do it AMD disown. Was with them a great experience. God forbid this to everyone.
Experience to yourself, I two owned. One now works fine. Especially today 2019 so where AMD as a budget is going well. And on approach Zen 2. don't forget. Everything else is empty slanders. He it's not perfect, but it is not critical. Play / work.
AMD is gaining popularity, and do not care about people like the haters and the technical details. Play in silence, so what about AMD here, not necessary to fill.
SnyperEl wrote:
As for the card. And what is it bad? Overclocking comes with 1080. For full hd (medium/high settings), this card will fit.
Why is junk when is RTX? So I wanted to look at the prices to compare. I do think b/a have pulled out already. And, it's on ultra so it digests. Medium / high - 1060 card. It is not necessary here, too greasy, for already two points given. Sit with 1080 and all on ultra twist.

Now would be the Intel in the first place to put his holes in the defense, where patches of his performance dropped. Not that time already.

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Yeah, I watched. Space timings persecuting her, if you can at all.
And you look at the timings at 4,000. There they ogogo. You can pick up apertivo with low timings and is easy to raise the frequency.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
This is the user - RichardWatty
I don't know.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Experience to yourself, I two owned. One now works fine. Especially today 2019 so where AMD as a budget is going well. And on approach Zen 2. don't forget. Everything else is empty slanders. He it's not perfect, but it is not critical. Play / work.
AMD is gaining popularity, and do not care about people like the haters and the technical details. Play in silence, so what about AMD here, not necessary to fill.
And I'm playing. And I had them (the percent). And I promise it is better to be without a computer than to assemble this tribe from a bunch of trouble. About their mothers and the RAM under AMD I generally keep quiet. The jamb on a jamb.
Okay, to each his own. Maybe you have a good ekzemplyary was.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Why is junk when is RTX? So I wanted to look at the prices to compare. I do think b/a have pulled out already. And, it's on ultra so it digests. Medium / high - 1060 card. It is not necessary here, too greasy, for already two points given. Sit with 1080 and all on ultra twist
I had 1080ti. Stood for 3 months. I do not need here to fill that ultra from him. She (1080ti) even where something sags.

VOVAN WOLF
In dogs 1-2 play. In Lara new play. In Deus ex you play last. In the metro new.In Kingdom Kam play. The GOST of the river, Waylands especially play))) And realize that the gtx 1080 - medium, sometimes high settings.
You can still continue the list.