KS lag on powerful computer (Counter-Strike: Global Offensive)
Hello,spotknulsya with the problem.I bought a comp 1060 1200 6gb r3 2 laths on 4 GB 2666ghz.The graphics card is loaded with a maximum of 20 percent gives 100 -140 not stable.Please help quicklySign a quality Ubisoft
Sign a quality Ubisoft wrote:
You like right here on their ass went sladinki, uporotyh fans of Intel just to take a good shit, even when it is not the topic.
A proof will be?
Or do you deny that Intel Negele fps more than AMD?
I told the man why he had problems.
Thread read ass it is you.
Aloska
Aloska wrote:
do you deny that Intel Negele fps more than AMD?
Your reaction to my post is proof)
This isn't the Board with her threads.
f1ozex123123
Pulls-no-dragging - let it out competent people, I personally side to this mess, a simple bit of triggered with fans to insert their not needed opinions about products of any company, earlier when someone was complaining about I love you live Wallpaper, and immediately flew uporotyh Cablofil and said ledroit derma pretty good so far topong, now such a situation only percent) War... War never changes.
Sign a quality Ubisoft
Do you understand what he even wrote?
Can you at least think and analyze information?
Which processors today provide more fps, well ?
Sign a quality Ubisoft
Look this video, maybe the author is with the settings of what voodoo?But he Ryzen 3 1200 @3500 MHz paired with 1050Ti and FPS is higher than that of the author
Aloska
And you yourself have analyzed the information before writing your vyser? I think not. On proanaliziruite at leisure and not burn, and even so hot, even lose consciousness: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-6700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-3-1200/3502vs3931
I'm generally not a word is said gives more fps, less. You started to get riled up, I'm not in the business)
[Denis]
That go all in on ultra put, although the COP is generally nafig not necessary, I personally just smoothing twisting on the x8, all the rest on the bottom of the twisting, 1050ti+r3 1200, 120-150 frames is enough.
zombijaic wrote:
How many Hertz do you have Monique? I doubt that 300
And where does the Monique: tried to remove the limit of shots (off the plane) and play on the monitor to 60 Hz when frame rate is higher that 60 fps? - open secret: play with the unlocked framrate even on this monitor is much nicer, especially in the FPS genre. But if the monitor supports more than 60 Hz is even better.
f1ozex123123
CPU: i3 - 3.6 GHz 8100
Motherboard: MSI Z370 - A PRO
RAM: Kingston HyperX FURY Black 16GB ( 2 plates for 8)
Video card: MSI GeForce GTX 1060 OC 6GB
For FullHD frames 120-180,it's not a powerful PC.
Aloska
Xeon for 2K copes
Upd: to cope with the replacement of analogue for 10K, who do not understand
f1ozex123123
Having even a top-end PC, for example in CS 1.6 the FPS above 100 will not rise
Aloska
No the computer will not give it a stable 300 fps. With a bunch of dancing with a tambourine, that might work. In General, meaningless, 60+ should last well
Was wondering how much will be given in my conference, in the evening I will unsubscribe
f1ozex123123
What are you 300 fps? Monique then go for 60? What is the meaning of this race for fps-s above the frequency of the monitor? New cult witness (don't know even why, help with the title)?
SonyK.
It is a placebo effect, nothing more.