Steve Taller
I tell you again, your origin is a complete trash load on the processor. I threw you a video above, where in the menu all 8 streams are loaded 70-80%. And then you will tell me that it is not about DRM protection? And watch dogs 2? And all these are yubiki.
And if we talk about gta 5 and WD2, then in the first there is a much more elaborate world and physics (of course, not the same as in GTA 4, but better than wd 2), quality. So there you have no problems at maximum settings. And in WD2 again the processor is loaded like hell. After the magnificent black flag and 6 heroes, I basically don't buy anything from yubiks. Heroes 6 of course are already disgraced, and the seventh and even more so. I don’t buy it because I don’t want my system to be raped by a game that just seemingly eats the processor and does not provide some kind of breakthrough quality.
Constant1ne wrote:
Once again I tell you, your origin is a complete trash on loading on the processor.
the game is also a complete trash
Constant1ne wrote:
And in WD2 again the processor is loaded like hell.
yes, my 5960x is loaded by 50-60%, and in some places even higher. But there are a lot of objects, a big world, all objects are moving, quite good physics, so of course 4 cores will be at the limit
Constant1ne wrote:
But I don't buy, because I don't want my system to be raped by a game that just imaginary eats a processor and doesn't give any then a breakthrough quality.
over the years of PC gaming, I got used to the fact that upgrades every 2-3 years should be done, and not complaining that the games are shit, and the hardware is loaded into an unknown direction. With this approach, I recommend that you buy a console
Constant1ne wrote:
My friend, I have a 7ka license, until I get off it. I threw off themes from Steam above on friezes, people have the same problem on top hardware. The evil within 2 is also incomprehensible lags.
stay on this old shit. Having a card with support for DH12 to use something other than wines 10 is just zvizdets. What prevents you from putting 10 Pro wines with all the updates?
Steve Taller
Why do I need dx12 ?? He only works in the tomb rider, it would be better to promote the volcano. Really good technology, unlike dx 12
Constant1ne wrote:
Yes, what for me dx12 ?? He only works in the tomb rider, it would be better to promote the volcano. Really good technology, unlike dx 12
In Girsach of Thief 4, dx12 is used and the game is just a bomb and visually, but even goes on calculators, skipping such a jester is a crime
shadow326 wrote:
retrograde)
when wines 7 came out, many were sitting on XP until they got sick and did not switch to a new axis, but any self-respecting gamer with normal hardware switched to wines 7 right away, I suppose I used Vista because of the support of dx10, and when 7 came out XP took down nafig right away. Also with 10 wines, I have been using it since its release and I am quite satisfied, there is not a single reason to continue using 7 wines
cheeyz wrote: it's
good that not everyone thinks like you
are not your mother, in 2018 to play games for win 7 ???? are you kidding or what?
I have now turned on 4 cores for the Core i5 8500 instead of 6 (in the case of 1070). Performance is the same as cadre, including near hospital at ultra 1080p. But when I turned on 2 cores, there were few of them.
Hellhound_Anger
is another delusional))) You at least figure out how the comments are displayed here, I can select the text from any message and I immediately get a button to quote it, and this is not an answer, but just a link to what was said, but if you are quoted a notification exactly the same how and when you are answered. Laughing, and yes. Be a sucker - buy an awesome shit, because Lisa Su said that their prots are the best gaming solutions, you can also buy an awesome video adapter a la a boiler and heat up in winter
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
But after this, where ANY counter argument was not given ...
what can you talk about with the person who wrote that amd processes are the best for games, and this despite the fact that everyone has already chewed up and shit, that oh5 for 6 boilers in games makes amd for 6 cores and 12 streams, and you continue to talk nonsense to the power of amd in games. There are a lot of tests just on YouTube and not only. Well, the lack of support for 4-channel memory and a small number of psi-express lines and smut with memory sticks, how is it?
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
And now the question to which I could not get an answer: HOW TO OPTIMIZE THE GAME FOR TECHPROCESS (or transistors)? I am waiting for an answer.
you are some kind of ram in nature, how many times do you need to explain again that there is an optimism for a certain exhaust, and it, in turn, is determined by the architecture and this is not only a technical process, it is also the performance per thread, the number of instructions per clock cycle, this is the cache speed and with a memory subsystem. Do you understand or are you full down? Compare the test of Aida's cache 4790k and 7700k, the same 4 cores and 8 threads, but the difference is very noticeable
here at least
https://www.google.com/search?q=aida64+cache+%26+memory+benchmark+4790k+vs + 7700k & client = firefox-b -ab & tbm = isch & source = iu & ictx = 1 & fir = h0YJM-rSoiLHhM% 253A% 252CegeKlU_nqkoUPM% 252C_ & usg = __ skSZ1lutlZ_HJSIt-1AlmCxVD-g% 3D & sa = X & ved = 0ahUKEwjA1rKYk9DbAhWhyKYKHRCrDmMQ9QEILDAA # imgrc = h0YJM-rSoiLHhM:
Hellhound_Anger written:
I made an unambiguous conclusion, idle talk, a liar, an inventor, avoiding answers to questions, a complete zero in iron.
yes, you are completely zero in the hardware, even probably minus 1
Mrmaxsimus86
I just didn’t work out with amd cards since 7970, there was a full ATAS with firewood, maybe something changed right now, I don’t know, but I don’t want to try, the consumption of vega 64 is more than that of 1080 or the same, and the exhaust is less , and even with 1080 it does not compete successfully everywhere, although otherwise the cards may be quite good, but nvidia is better. And in terms of percentage, I myself switched from AMD to Intel and I do not regret it at all, I hope I have enough of my 5960s to play for a long time, in AK Origins there is already no optimization for the old architecture, my percent is not able to load 1080 and it loads itself by 50% maximum, the same 6900k loads 1080 in full, although it is 5-7% more powerful than my processor. Let's see how it will be in other games, in principle, it is playable everywhere and more than 60 frames, but still the aftertaste is unpleasant. Pravada AK Oh, I have a pirate, there were still updates,
Hellhound_Anger
What don't you understand? Each new generation of prots differs in performance, and if the game engine was developed that it needed such a minimum exhaust from the processor, then if the old processes do not correspond to this exhaust and are not able to provide it, then the gameplay will not be comfortable either, did you understand?
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
Same AMD processors, the difference between Intel and AMD is only in TESTS. We sit with 1600 and gtx 1080, we get 100% load of the video card and do not worry. The memory is cheap, it costs the same for 2400. 4-channel memory - OVERPAYMENT, does not give an increase in games, and mat. fees are unreasonably expensive. LOL. Already a bunch of tests and other things in comparison, the 4th channel is not an argument, but an empty overpayment.
the difference between intel and amd is most noticeable in games, since the optimon in games is more for intel, as well as cards from nvidia are better in games, because the optimon is better for nvid. Moreover, in AMD, the system of multithreading and data migration between streams is made through a crutch in the form of a bus of infinity factories, not all game engines and programs "understand" such a game. In games, 7700k allows any rizen to suck pussy, even in AK Origins 7700k is better than 1800x, because it is optimistic. If you believe in the potential of 1080, believe further, the time of 1080 is already coming to an end and next year it may only be enough for 1080p and even then at high
Mrmaxsimus86 wrote:
Vega performance is now between 1080 and 1080ti
what are you talking about??? Vega 64 is at 1080, somewhere it lags behind, somewhere a little better, games where it lags more. Up to 1080 vege 64 is very far away
Mrmaxsimus86 wrote:
You have to play at 45 fps with drawdowns at 1080p, albeit at ultra settings with an increased in-game resolution up to 160% in order to somehow load the map.
45 fps is uncomfortable, set the scale to 100% and even with an underload of the map you will have higher fps,
but with a scale of up to 160%
Steve Taller
hey dudes PI * blow in the IRON section
f * ck you litter the branch here, here we are discussing the optimization of the game itself
and not your arguments ..
Why are you fucking all that ?! what the fuck!?! such graphics and performance! - a shame! take batman AO! it was necessary after so many years to release such not optimized shit (though the dialogues did not disappoint), but in general the game is a SHAME OF THE GAME!
Got a response from the developer about glitches and optimization. Deal with the problem.
AND
They showed an example of how to optimize not necessary. People with 1070 complain about FPS drops. What can I say with the old 7970. In general, drawdowns are up to 1 fps.