Lots of performance issues (Deus Ex: Mankind Divided)
Hello everyone, in general, while the game was released, I was working and did not really climb into it a couple of times and I immediately realized that my I5 GTX770 and 8 gigs of RAM somehow do a very bad job with the game. What is most annoying: constant FPS drawdowns almost to zero to a static picture, very long loading when moving between metro stations. The firewood is new, the computer has been cleared of all trash and debris with such programs as the cleaner and SystemCare defragmented disks, reset all settings to a minimum, the game still fiercely slows down what to do? Except for the most obvious iron change action? Why is the open-world witcher stsuko going to a stable 60+ fps and it slows down?R_D_V
My friend has an i5 + GTX 660 2gb computer, but he says that the game runs stably at medium settings of 45-50 fps without sagging. Although I have an R7250x 1gb video card, there are strong drawdowns at the minimum, the maximum in the city is 25-30 fps
MrWorld
Pro 660 wrote a lot that it more or less drags the game, there is no optimization at all. You have Radion, which, in theory, should better cope with the game from these developers. The only thing left is to wait for patches and hope that the optimization will be corrected to a playable state. Dunov's system is still littered. PC gaming will be killed. I'll go write an angry comment on the incentive. By the way, my game is somehow strangely curtailed, the game is turned off and the sound goes on anyway. The jamb on the jamb has already regretted the money spent on the game. I thought I'd play with pleasure on the weekend, but here's an unplayable ram ...
R_D_V
I agree, I wanted to return the money but played for 3 hours. It's a shame, I hope the game will be corrected by the fall, especially since I live in Kazakhstan, and our game costs 2k rubles
Man, don't worry and keep working. I do that too. After a couple of salaries, the patches will be finished and you can play.
LeopoldoMendoza
With the current attitude of "game makers" to the consumer, it was not worth waiting for another. And about what will be corrected, it is doubtful.
In general, a very stable impression is created that "some", "some", paid very well so that disgruntled (deceived) users rushed to the store to stock up on 1080 ... Because if this is not so, then how you have to be *********, in order to release such a "product", just put SUCH FAT spoiler underneath in your incompetence and curvature.
Those who disagree can draw their "minuses" even to the shit, but if, nevertheless, finally turn on the head and use it for its intended purpose ... As they say: WAKE UP!
Hattack
Something a lot of theories came about 1080 and delivery of coins, say wake up but don't think with your head. eidos and square enix do not have any partnerships with Nvidia, and the main port of the game is console. therefore, they optimize last, for the current maps. on AMD, the optimization is better because they finance it, I myself am sitting on a low computer with gtx760 and am sure that the optivizon was brought under the 900 series and I7. And in general edos doesn't get along with optimization. that HR, that Thief, worked well only on top hardware
also while I scored on it, I will wait for patches, terrible friezes out of the blue on any settings, config in the profile
R_D_V
Right now I 'm playing at work 2500k (4k) + 670 + 8GB, usually 60 fps, in city loads up to 45-50 it does not fall for long (dvigla features, on consoles the spindle turns only 5200)
What turned off
Shadows are average (high, the difference not what, but - 10 fps)
Soft shadows
Textures high + detailing and ultra faces
Depth of field is just on along with the engine anti-aliasing
Well, the most important is volumetric lighting (why it was screwed to the dvigl it is not clear the effect is zero and eats not weak)
You did not write what for Specifically, you have a percentage, MB is a bottleneck in it and it does not need to be overclocked much.
R_D_V
I don’t know where you’re having problems. Settings are on: very high: all included. I play without problems. gtx 980 amd fx 8350 32 ram
HaniBubu
You yourself wrote 6GB of RAM, this is your problem, the game eats just 6GB + win 7 there is another 1.5-2 GB, that is, at least 8 GB is needed
or buy memory or increase the swap file to 4-5 GB
Beirut
well, maybe you're right, but on the other hand, people with 8 or more RAM also had such problems, I have 8.1 wines and according to the schedule in the task manager when the game is running, 5-5.7 GB of RAM is used
HaniBubu install
MSIAfterburner and remove all the information from the processor, memory, video, etc. and you will immediately see what is missing, play around with the settings to fit yourself. And for starters, just increase the swap file and look whether it helped or not,
in fact, Windows is eating from a gigabyte and if you say that 5.7 is in the dispatcher, logically, the game probably unloads the system from memory and they are a bit crowded there from here and friezes
At maximum the game produces about 50fps, but often freezes. The video card works like a steam engine. Square enix promised optimization, but it doesn't even smell. All hope for patches and new drivers.
LeopoldoMendoza
Yes, I'm not particularly worried, I just hoped to play a new game on the weekend, especially since I liked the previous part to the holes. Yes, and this one is not worse, only there are big problems with optimization ...
fox345
This is bad optimization of your norms, you have some norms, and Petit has no norms because the hardware is different.
I’m going through HR for now. 3 At the same time I’ll remember my past achievements and wait ...
Waffen is
similar, I will replay and remember the plot though! made a pre-order for the game and changed the card with a specialist for the exit, as a result, on an ultra with a resolution of 2k in the test, the minimum is 35 fps on gtx1080, I'm just a little shocked and this is without anti-aliasing at all ... let's wait for patches
like if offline play the game time is not taken into account. So I advise you to use it in order to fully test it offline, and then return it or not.
Right now I'm going through the first final build 2000 there, but here the game build is only 524, so it's still a long time)))
People, ultra settings are designed for top-end video from AMD (preferably in Crossfire mode). On the ultra, such AMD-shnye plots as Close Hardening Shadows, HD Ambient Occlusion, Steep Parrallax Mapping with tessellation processing, frame blur using AMD-BOKE, and even 4x MSSA are included. All this taken together has an inhuman burden on the system. Just play at High settings with FXAA and don't get too excited. I have an Intel Core i5 2300, 8 gigs of opera and a 4 gig GTX 960. At High settings I have 35-45 fps and I am quite happy with the result. On the 970th, you can squeeze 60 frames in general.