Kill or leave to suffer?
What is better to finish off a person or leave him to die?Please justify.
To cure and force to live without a break in the Russian Federation on unemployment benefits. Death still needs to be earned.
requiemmm
Cruel. : D
Alexator
It is still unknown where he will be better ... or worse.
If you walk down the street and see a stoned drunk and insolent redneck, then it's better to finish it off. Because he already has one foot in the grave. You look at others will not do anything bad. Although it is better to beat and leave for dead, the article will be different, more forgiving.
Cheburator Founder
I read another study where we overtook the United States and Israel worse for living than Afghanistan during the American occupation.
Alexator
You were lied to.
And as far as I remember, the Americans fed the locals with their food there.
Is free.
Cheburator Founder,
you too, have not been told the whole truth.
And as far as I remember, this did not prevent residents from joining the partisans. Maybe the food was just lousy? Or did the Afghans think food was not what they needed for killing relatives?
ask this question to the stakeholder
then reflect on your own benefit and motivation.
or in a different order.
in almost all situations, providing passive dying will be more beneficial than active dying.
requiemmm wrote:
To cure and force to live without a break in the Russian Federation on unemployment benefits. Death still needs to be earned.
