Tefarteds 20.12.20 05:47 am

Sweet FX. Should I bet or not? (Battlefield 1)

Those who write that it just increases the brightness, in vain.
Looks like you just didn't use normal presets for it. Or they could not deliver it normally.
Here is an example, on both screenshots all the settings are the same (on the second one I just watched how the effects on the ultra looked, but it doesn't matter here).

Divider by my opinion, I am very glad that the preset from bf4 came up and the game looks much more pleasant.

Without fx:

9 Comments

Knight52 20.12.20

Contrast, saturation and chroma are increased.
Can I have more examples? For example, in the shade, close-up, indoors, please.

ABRASc. 20.12.20

It's better without Sweet FX.

DanielRt 20.12.20

Well, who can throw Sweet Fx here, on pg?

BORODA327 20.12.20

without;

ReShade 1.1.0 with SweetFX 2.0

Tefarteds 20.12.20

Knight52
I can do it in the evening.
These aspects + sharpness make the picture much nicer and give the feeling that the resolution is increased (this scale).

Tefarteds 20.12.20

4k and ultra settings with suite:
there are no originals without suite

Patrol gear 20.12.20

JKELL80 20.12.20

In battle4 I have a suite fx. I like it, the picture is worse without it. But as anyone. See for yourself.

EKCTPACEHC 20.12.20

I set myself such a preset: https://sfx.thelazy.net/games/preset/6056/
Adds a little juiciness to the picture and does not eat FPS.