3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
x
xxx05 28.12.20 02:47 am

selection of a video card for a processor

Will the gtx 970 work at full capacity if I have an intel core 2 duo 3 GHz processor? If it is worth changing which one (i3, i5, i7)?
one more question: if I have a processor from Intel, can I put an ati radeon video card?
23 Comments
Sort by:
N
NorthernSky 28.12.20

No, with a 2nd crust you will have a bottleneck. i5 at least, but better i7 /

l
lookaway 28.12.20

xxx05 wrote:
Will gtx 970 work at full capacity if I have an intel core 2 duo 3 GHz processor
net
xxx05 wrote:
on which one (i3, i5, i7)
i5 i7 from the
xxx05 budget wrote:
if I have a processor from Intel then can i put the video card ati radeon
da

w
warp 37 28.12.20

The processor will not even reveal the GTX 950. For GTX 970, you need an up-to-date Core i3 or any Core i5.

H
Hamika 28.12.20

even i5 4460 is enough

c
chaos410 28.12.20

i5 4690K for 970

M
MunchkiN 616 28.12.20

I have an intel core 2 duo 3 GHz processor?
no
change which one (i3, i5, i7)?
starting from the upper last and 3 the further the faster the better
one more question: if I have a processor from Intel, can I put an ati radeon video card?
you can combine brands of processors with brands of video cards as you like.

R
Razox 28.12.20

Why do you need 970? Take Che on the newest, 480 or 1060. More relevant somehow.

a
asbarton 28.12.20

lookaway
Of course you can, I have a stone i5-2400, vidyuha r9-280, work great together

P
Porsche911GT3RS 28.12.20

Of course it will not work at full capacity. A waste of time.

K
Kraicher 28.12.20

xxx05
But the motherboard will also have to be changed. You can both Radeon and Nvidia. But 1060 is better, as advised.

l
lookaway 28.12.20

asbarton
chto?

S
Scops owl 28.12.20

And I have such a question. I understand that it has not even been announced yet. Still, i7-4770k (4GHz) won't be the bottleneck for 1080Ti ???

M
MAzh0R_VA_GIN_A_T0RIUS 28.12.20

xxx05 Throw
this kaku out quickly !!!!!! If you put the 970th with this process, then you will not feel its performance, I tell you 1000%, the result will be some kind of gtx 630 in performance instead of 970 !!!!! Take any i5, from socket 1155 onwards.

M
MAzh0R_VA_GIN_A_T0RIUS 28.12.20

Splyushka
You know, I thought about it too, only took it more globally. Will my 6700k overclock be a bottleneck for two 1080ti, or two Titans-mutons. I hope who is asking such questions soon, as soon as cruising vidyahs come out, there will be plenty of information on the network !!! As for you, when we tested two 980Ti (so they were still in overclocking !!!), the percentage was 4790K, and the frequency was overclocked to 4.6 and all vidyahi felt great. 99-100% were revealed in games So don't be afraid!

S
Scops owl 28.12.20

Prim Myshyvur
It's just that my 780 died, just ... recently. The chip fell off :) Now I will not take the reference. If I don't want to, it makes no sense. I don't need 4k :) I'm happy with full dh. Well, that means how it comes out so we will take it. I thought I could take the 980ti. Then I thought, what's the point. For the same amount, 1070 will be faster. Now I'm waiting for 1080 :)
Why do you need two titans ?) At 6700 they will be 8 + 8

M
MAzh0R_VA_GIN_A_T0RIUS 28.12.20

Splyushka
Then I thought, what's the point. For the same amount, 1070 will be faster. Now I'm waiting for 1080 :) What's the point ??? For full HD, it's much easier than vidyahi. 1080ti for 2k resolution. And some well-optimized games that are not too demanding will do just fine at 4k with this video! Even for gtx 1080 full hd resolution is simply redundant!
Why do you need two titans?) At 6700 they will be 8 + 8
Yes fig knows about these 8 + 8.16 + 16, etc. Somehow at work they were assembling computers with the guys, it was interesting to check the performance of several views on different motherboards and protsats - 8 + 8 and 16 + 16. Nuuu, damn it, it's not that somewhere there was less or more performance, that there, that everything is the same there. Why more lines ... Where is the difference ... Therefore, six months ago I hammered 211-v3 on this socket. In addition to the fact that both the percentage and the motherboard are expensive, all the more there is no point, the performance is just penny, but the price is yeah))) Therefore, the point in these lines is at least I say from 8 + 8 onwards? When in modern games they tested everywhere the vidyashki were loaded in the avterbeneer by 99-100%. The difference in performance between the prots was visible only in the adobe package. The procs were 6700, 6700K, 5820K, 5830. The vids were 2xTitanX - Evga, Gigabyte. But this is old Titan

n
nominar 28.12.20

Primal Mouseyvur
Sense from titanium? 30% more powerful than 1080, and the overpayment is fierce.

M
MAzh0R_VA_GIN_A_T0RIUS 28.12.20

nominar
5-6 minutes ago I would argue with you, but now after this news https://www.overclockers.ru/hardnews/77946/videokarta-nvidia-titan-x-eto-reshenie-ne-dlya-igr.html I agree)))))
By the way, why do you think that the difference is 30%? After all, the difference between gtx 980 and Titan X (Maxwell) is too tangible !!!!

V
VITYA_KOLYADENKO 28.12.20

xxx05
Theoretically, on an ultra in Full HD, your percent would be loaded even by Asusu Ares 2. But with overclocking to 3800 MHz it would be better.
But. How is your motherboard with PCI Espress lines? Maybe for a normal vidyahi you need at least 2.0, but you don't have such?

K
Kraicher 28.12.20

Splyushka wrote:
Now I will not take a reference.
Yes, all this is nonsense. My chip on the 690th fell off, not from the ref. What is good about the ref, that there are all settings from the manufacturer, no overclocking. Personally, I deliberately took the EVGA GTX 1070 ref.