What vidyuhu is better to take?
Hello, dear regulars, ordinary users of this forum, I have such an unusual question.A little background: my friend's parents bought a computer in the distant and dashing 2009. The specifications of the computer are as follows: Intel core2Qaid Q9400 2.66GhZ; Geforce gtx 280 1gb VRAM; 4gb RAM; 450W power supply. So recently an unpleasant incident happened - the video card had a chip dump (artifacts on the screen, blinking and other delights), and so we had a brilliant idea - we installed 8 gb RAM, overclocked the percentage to 3.4 GHZ, and so we decided to buy a normal video card of all the options remains 3. 1) Geforce GTX 660; 2) Geforce gtx 750ti; 3) geforce gtx 950. PCE 2.0 memory bus. PS My friend's father loves to play far cry 1, 3. We want to give him 4 fun, so that at least some variety was. Who will advise what? Apart from buying a computer from scratch.
with an old and dull power supply and overclocking, you need to look at the power consumption of the video card. it seems to me that 950 eats the least.
Farkrai 4 can not go on this computer without some kind of fix - a crack for old processors.
Alexey Chichigin
The processor is 4-core, but very old. Why did they disperse so much? Will it not burn?
[Denis Alexandrovich]
what percentage? it's just that people on core i3 start quietly, and this one has 4 physical cores, I think it will calmly pull, and the monitor there is 1680x1050, not even full
fomir
I watched a video from the stalker, so he overclocked core2Qaid Q6600 and nothing is normal, video cards of the 700 series calmly holds (750ti). the processor will not burn, I think it had a GTX 280 there before, the card was very hot, that is, the cooling is normal there are two additional coolers, and the case is quite large. Personally, it seems to me that the GTX 950 will be the ideal option, it is economical, and the games of 2015 are quietly exported at high levels. but a friend broke 15 haymakers to pay for it, he is offered 750ti or 660GTX for 2gb for 6.5 haymakers to take.
Alexey Chichigin
Full HD starts from 1600x900;))
Let him take the GTX 660 - it is the most powerful of all the proposed ones, and in general this is an old pre-top (as they explained to me here), here it has more capacities than 950 or 750Ti ... No kidding, I myself, from my personal experience of 4 years, could not slide with the 660-Ti, there was simply no better in the segment, and now there is a GTX 1060
Alexey Chichigin
Take the Geforce GTX 950, it is almost the same as the 660th and eats 30 watts less electricity, as for the processor, it is quite good, especially under overclocking, I only have the same 8400 and until I ran into the cut off possibilities mothers (4 gig of RAM only supports ...) I did not even think of changing it, and yours is a little more powerful from mine, worked in tandem with GTX660. 660TI eats 150W, 660 120W, 950 90W, 750TI 60W, percent under overclocking 100W.
I would also advise you to replace the electrolytes in the power supply so that it delivers its 450 watts.
Geforce GTX 660; 2) Geforce gtx 750ti; 3) geforce gtx 950
For such people came up with a console.
Twisted Tesla Gigafactory
I already have a PS4, that's why I got off my pc because of such delays
Alexey Chichigin
CPU AMD Phenom ll x4 940 BE @ 3.3GHz Do
people run on old core i3?
fomir
Full HD starts from 1600x900;))
Nothing starts there. FHD is 1920x1080, which is
not inferior in performance to 980
Do not mislead a person
Alexey Chichigin
That's what I'm talking about. Basically, when there is no money for a productive PC, they buy a console.
Alexey Chichigin
I'll tell you this. I once had 280 from zotak. After buying it, I tested it in benchmarks. And when it broke, I bought a GTX 660 and ran it through the tests. And I was surprised by the results. It is inferior to 660 by no more than 10%. I'm completely serious. So, it's better to take 960 as a minimum. Better yet, the new Radeon RX 480.
Alexey Chichigin
Alexey Chichigin wrote: okay, let's buy 660, I think, and there we will dance with a tambourine.
If you don’t change the power supply unit, then, most likely, you will dance around the remains of the computer. For 7 years of work in the system with the 280th vidyahy bp should have worn out significantly, especially if it is a Chinese "No-name", and you also want to use it with an overclocked percentage.
So GTX660 or GTX660ti the difference is significant - different graph of proc. : 660ti-top percent.
And don't worry at all http://ru.gecid.com/video/asus_gtx660_ti-dc2t-2gd5/?s=all
Almost at the very bottom you can choose any cards from different manufacturers and compare performance, power consumption, etc. Graphically.
Alexey Chichigin
Q9400 old percent I would look at a replacement for which Xeon you can put instead of a quad. Server solutions are often much better.
And since this socket 775 is very cheap.
I've just upgraded my i7 920 to Xeon E5645. And now my percentage is better than 3770K, even if it is overclocked. In CINEBENCH_R15, he scores 930 points. So I know what I'm writing about.
fomir wrote:
Full HD starts from 1600x900
Invented it yourself? 1600 * 900 is HD +.
...
[Denis Aleksandrovich] wrote: it is
not inferior in performance to 980
Do not mislead a person
Also neighing.
Author, from all this you need to take the 950th and easily overclock to 960th in stock
Len4ik00N
If he replaces the electrolytes in the power supply unit and there is not the most finished Chinese, then everything will be fine, I have such a 450-watt "No-name", copes well with the GTX 660 and the Intel core2 Quad Q8400 overclocked to 3.2GHz.