Prompt a map to stream from PS5

I'm a little behind the times but on sale there is, for example,
AVerMedia "Live Gamer 4K"
Elgato Game Capture 4K60 Pro MK.2
and as I understand it, they capture 4k 60fps only there in the form of an output why, in theory, it should go to the CPU via the bus. The cpu should already compress on the fly with a software codec or broadcast what is meant to compress. or we are talking only about the output of 4k 60fps

MunchkiN 616 wrote:
I am a little behind the times but on sale there is, for example,
AVerMedia "Live Gamer 4K"
Elgato Game Capture 4K60 Pro MK.2
Elgado is expensive with the same characteristics as avermedia. And so honest, both when recording and when broadcasting 4k 60fps, they will give out, only with hdr you will see, but users because of their devices are unlikely.

X_ray_83 wrote:
Here is a review for understanding what and where, if you don't understand "why"!
And why are you throwing this at me? You are a little strange. I know everything very well.
MunchkiN 616
Everything is fine with them with capture, but 4K is the maximum possible to write at a bitrate of 150 Mbps. A normal and chewed up review is here, so that you do not paint all this for a long time, you can read it yourself https://3logic.ru/reviews/review.php?ID=51520
.

Somewhere in the news I read that Logitech will soon release its capture cards, but they will only cost a lot of money, if only their set for video conferencing costs under $ 1.5k. Although they have a proprietary program Capture, I wonder if it can somehow compete with the re-central and obs. So at the moment, apart from avermedia for this money, there is simply nothing normal.

Torkvist
OBS is the most functional, REcentral can also be used calmly if you do not attach different donations to it on the stream. Logiki may release video capture cards, but perhaps they will not release them for ordinary users, like avermedia, but will make them narrowly focused, there are such cards and they cost a couple of thousand $ each.

Torkvist is not entirely clear why they should come up with a bike again if everything works fine anyway, I tried both with obs and with recentral - excellent software that, together with GC573, covers all the wishes.
Petruxinson wrote:
4K is the maximum possible to write at a bitrate of 150 Mbps.
and the card can be 240 Mbps - by the way, the review also has it

inkoggnito
This is a lot even for 4k, they basically wrote it there. It seems to me that 150 Mbps will be quite enough for itself both for UHD and for all other resolutions. Another thing is that you can capture Full HD at up to 240 fps, which is much more fun.

Petruxinson
What's the point of 240 fps for streaming?
What if all sites support only 60 today?

Petruxinson
and here the frequency to the bitrate, I can't understand something, I saw that it says that you can capture 240 Hz, as I understand it, when capturing 240 Hz, it doesn't matter what you're viewing, at 60 Hz or 120, just if you put the record on pause in a dynamic scene, the image will be clear, and at 60 Hz - blurry

Lex-one
Vaughn answered you inkoggnito, and the video is captured not only in order to conduct streams.
inkoggnito wrote:
what does the frequency to the bitrate have to do with something, I have nothing to
do with it, just wrote that there is such a functionality. I already understood that she can write with a bitrate of 240 Mbit / s, before I read it like another review and wrote about 150 Mbit / s there. Nesastykovachka.

Petruxinson
It is necessary to be guided by the data from the manufacturer's website, because avermedia has two models of approximately the same GC553 which can 4k with 30 fps, so it can have 150 Mbps, and the second GC573 which can be 4k with 60 fps, so it will have 240 Mbps.

Torkvist
Just looked at the specs on the avermedia site, both cards can write at 240 Mbps. Only the GC573 can write 4K 60 fps with HDR, and the GC553 can write 4K 30 fps without HDR. Plus they also point out that HRD recording is only possible through their Recentral software, I wonder if OBS can do HDR?

Petruxinson
well, that's understandable, but it seems like 240 mb / s is a lot for UHD and 150 is about how much it should be, and I set such settings, and the quality is then excellent.
Petruxinson wrote:
HRD is only possible through their Recentral software, I wonder if OBS can do HDR?
https://www.reddit.com/r/obs/comments/efjqc0/recording_hdr_games_obs_is_out_any_other/ -from this I realized that no, but why if recentral can?

inkoggnito wrote:
well, that's understandable, but it seems like 240 mb / s is a lot for UHD and 150 is about how much it should be, and I set such settings, and the quality is then excellent.
Well, I wrote above that 150 mb / s is enough for UHD. Only then everyone began to say that she can do more, well, let her know how, there is still a reserve that means.
It turns out that if you need to capture a signal from HRD to GC573, then you need to use REcentral. Well, in principle, it is convenient.