Red Dead Redemption2 vs Metro Exodus (Red Dead Redemption 2)
For some reason I want to compare these games. Two survivors, unhurried exploration .. All this can be said about the one that about the other .. The only difference I see is in the proprietary Rockstar battle, when the whole city rushes at you, and you safely shoot from everyone, in the subway the idea is supposedly such that you should not fly with a saber bald, and think several times whether it is worth dealing with this or that mob ... But if you delete the battle, both there and there great attention is paid to majestic landscapes .. The setting of the wild west among the rock stars, by the way, inspired that something home, dear .. About Metro is so clear in this regardCompare empty fields with a scanty number of events per unit of time and a cheerful bellboy joker?)
Derley,
both games are more similar in terms of the developers' obsession with a realistic approach to everything, to gameplay, drawing, unhurried gameplay, etc. As a result, both this and that game gives maximum immersion due to its super-realism. As for me, too, only these two games have been the most memorable over the past few years.
I would not call rdr2 a survivalist. The story of a bandit in a world where everything is arranged, and continues to evolve. And the story of one soldier in a completely destroyed world)
Here the comparison by Folaut would be more likely to be correct, but he is of little interest without mods, and for Metro they are not needed)
And if you compare Metro and RDR2, then really by attention to detail))