Discussion of the plot of GTA 5 (Grand Theft Auto 5)
The storyline campaign is awesome. BUT there is a significant disadvantage. It ended very abruptly. Killing all 4 antagonists in one last mission was superfluous, the topic of their deaths has not been disclosed. It would be better to stretch it over 4 missions.I expected more from GTA 5
half of the game the plot is cool, then it becomes boring, go here and here kill that
Completely traveled
Agree. I also liked the plot. No less than an open world, attention to detail and realism)
The plot is credible, especially in the first person, when you go through, many FPS wipes their nose
The plot somehow did not really like it, it is clear that it is an ordinary stump. But on the other hand, the passage of the mission was awesome, everything was clearly worked out. The robberies are especially smart.
Michael was just pissed off by the family. The wife is a whore, the daughter is a porn actress, and the son is just an asshole ...
I was also enraged by Michael's family, if there was an ending with a divorce, I would choose her.
Completely gone
Kill all 4 antagonists in one last mission was superfluous, the topic of their deaths has not been disclosed.
I agree. Crumpled somehow, in five minutes we got together and decided how to continue to live.
The next moment.
I did not like some of the missions that destroy the overall picture of the narrative and
and question the fairness of the events taking place earlier. Concerns missions in which the development of the relationship between the main characters of the game and the Mexican gangster Martin Madrazo is shown. I will describe in more detail later, but otherwise without any complaints
The plot is cool but short, after the passage of the main plot to play further in the single as it is not willing, does not pull at all. You can play online, although as for me, online is boring too quickly.
What have you done to an autocensor since when is online is a forbidden word?
It seems to me that the third ending with the rescue of both old men was screwed at the last moment for a happy end, which is why it turned out so strange. After all, remember - in 4 parts there were two endings, both are rather sad. Many freaks were unhappy and slandered the plot just because of this, so at 5 they screwed up a happy ending.
Flow4Master
just shows that 2 bad endings were made just to be,
and the atmosphere of 5 is completely different,
this is never a drama,
and in 4 no one cares about kate
I really liked the passage. I wanted more big robberies with preparation and so on.
Passed by 45.5%.
Very satisfied with the plot. A lot of adrenaline in missions. Especially when Trevor jumped off the plane in a jeep, chasing two fast cars, robbing a jeweler. Missions are just breathtaking)
I'm not happy with the endings. I can't believe that the script was written by the same people as GTA IV.
A) Michael's death. (Illogical)
When Michael climbs the highest tower, he immediately runs away from the stairs (very high), although he could kill Franklin while he climbs it.
B) Trevor's death. (Illogical)
Trevor gets out of the car, Franklin talks to him without pointing the gun ... Then he points and talks again, and when Trevor gets into the car, Franklin does not fire, although he could have hit 20 times.
C) Happy End.
It's hard to believe that such a story could end without loss. Steve Haynes (an agent with a navel on his chin) could be dunked (logically) in missions when they met in non-human places, but he had things to do with all three heroes ... although apparently they destroyed their files in that building, I hope ...
The endings ruined the experience, and I still think GTA IV is the best in the series.
And yes, Martin Madrazo, after they stole his wife, injured his ear. He, even after the return of his wife and getting the dough, forgave Trevor ... So that the Latin authority would forgive after this ... somehow I can't believe it.
Flow4Master
No, we made a happy ending, because not all people go through additional missions until the end of the game.