Evaluation of grades or money is everything
So, here's a tentative list of the 25 "best?" games in 2007:1. Super Mario Galaxy WII Nintendo 36 8.8 [b] 97.7% [/ b]
2. The Orange Box EA Games 26 9.5 [b] 96.2% [/ b]
3. BioShock 2K Games 83 9.2 [b] 95.3% [/ b]
4. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Activision 40 9.1 [b] 95.2% [/ b]
5. Halo 3 X360 Microsoft Game Studios 81 8.5 [b] 93.3% [/ b]
6 . The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Bethesda Softworks 51 7.7 [b] 93.0% [/ b]
7. Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar PC Stardock 24 7.9 [b] 92.9% [/ b]
8. God of War II PS2 SCEA 75 9.0 [b] 92.7% [/ b]
9. Guitar Hero II X360 RedOctane 54 8.1 [b] 92.3% [/ b]
10. Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition WII Capcom 54 8.8 [b] 91.2% [/ b]
11. Final Fantasy VI Advance GBA Nintendo 25 8.6 [b] 91.0% [/ b]
12. World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade PC Blizzard Entertainment 47 7.5 [b] 91.0% [/ b]
13. Virtua Fighter 5 Online X360 Sega 20 8.4 [b] 91.0% [/ b]
14. Metroid Prime 3: Corruption WII Nintendo 53 8.9 [b] 90.0% [/ b]
15. Castlevania: Symphony of the Night X360 Konami 21 8.3 [b] 90.0% [/ b]
16. Forza Motorsport 2 X360 Microsoft Game Studios 67 9.1 [b] 89.8% [/ b]
17. World in Conflict PC Sierra Entertainment 43 6.4 [b] 89.3% [/ b]
18. The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass DS Nintendo 54 9.1 [b] 89.2% [/ b]
19. Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction PS3 SCEA 49 8.1 [b] 88.8% [/ b]
20. Planet Puzzle League DS Nintendo 24 10.0 [b] 88.1% [/ b]
21. The Elder Scrolls IV: Shivering Isles X360 Bethesda Softworks 40 8.3 [b] 87.7% [/ b]
22. Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 3 PS2 Atlus Co. 43 8.8 [b] 87.6% [/ b]
23. Supreme Commander PC THQ 43 8.1 [b] 87.6% [/ b]
24. Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword PC 2K Games 30 8.0 [b] 87.3% [/ b]
25. Disgaea: Afternoon of Darkness PSP NIS America 24 9.0 [b] 87.2% [/ b]
* the multiplatform "next door" is taken under the highest rating
Judging by these estimates, the list includes at least 15 games of all times and peoples ( 90+). Is it really?
What games do you think are on this list that shouldn't be?
For which games do you think the score is completely inadequate?
And the main question is, what is the reason for the tendency to bet [b] 10/10 [/ b], [b] 100/100 [/ b] to a large number of games?
BioShock overestimated
Ratchet & Clank Future extremely overestimated: dn: 6-7 points
with the rest agree / did not play: knight:
[b] Mushishi [/ b], at the same size, clothes get bigger over time, CDs are recorded at higher volume, games are given higher ratings. People love it when the games they play get high marks. That's all.
I would remove those from the port-port-port category - they are great yes, but now there are repetitions
[b] Don Reba [/ b], I don't care what the score of the game I like is, my opinion usually coincides with the opinion of the players, with the opinion of the reviewers is not always. Although the reviews are different - if it is from some thread of a little-known resource or from what thread it is, then it is usually more truthful, no one crushes tea
maybe the game journalists are normal, the more advertising and hype, the higher the scores ... How can I give bioshok and other halma 10ki, I finally don’t understand. :?
I watch the current press for funny pictures and videos.
Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword and Supreme Commander are slightly overpriced, IMHO.
BioShock estimates - must have been eating potatoes in cisterns, overestimated.
The rest either did not play, or I agree.
[b] Don Reba [/ b],: agree: there is not even anything to add.
money hardly decides anything directly, but besides money there are many methods of regulating the policy of working with the press. Fresh demos for example.
And the fact that 9 is given to everyone in a row is complete heresy. 9 is actually eight. 9 is Quake 3 Arena (with all its innovation), 8.7 is Unreal Tournament, and 9.6 is Starcraft. And not just any seven-point crap like Bioshock.
For explicit clonos (Guitar Hero) should be deducted by a point right away. And on business - the press has long lacked intelligent cynical experts who love games. To smash Bioshok so that the pieces flew.
The CoD 4 score is clearly overstated. For a mean single and a good multi they don't put that much.
[quote] 1. Super Mario Galaxy WII Nintendo 36 8.8 97.7% [/ quote]
totally agree ..: agree: ->
evaluations of the gaming press are objective: ksfd
:: lol:
[b] vodafon [/ b], and Zelda is now, of course, rubbish, if the upstart broke her by ratings?
Those ratings were not at all the same as they are now. About any "Mario cooler than Zelda" we can not talk. He can only be cooler than Bioshock.
I stopped reckoning with GayStop's opinion for a long time, and GameRankings is just an average rating among a bunch of morons and two or three normal reviewers, so there can be no question of objectivity. I evaluate the games myself and I think it is right.
GameRankings can be used as a base of reviews for games, but not as an absolute indicator of their quality (but I admit it, and it is sometimes convenient). There are 4-5 editions, the opinion of which is interesting to me, and according to them I assess whether it is worth playing at all. Thanks to them, I have not spent long hours lately on any progression. The rest of the fans to bet 8 and 9 in a row (IGN, for example) boldly go through the forest.
Well, the problem of many visitors is that they only look at ratings, but do not read articles, so prejudices appear in them. And in normal publications, with rare exceptions, everything is clearly reasoned.
[b] Guess Who [/ b], and I trust Edge. So they understand in many cases what six is ​​and that most games are generally five