Batman: Arkham Knight - Plot Discussion and Spoilers

Any thoughts who appear at the end? Nightwing, I think, disappears, because it does not have such power. What about Azrael?

Well, the ending hints rather thickly that this is Arkham Knight. When he rescued Batman, he wore the symbol of the bat on his chest.

It could also be Bruce Wayne, who was like reborn, faking his own death and now does not stand on ceremony.

Bruce said he needed a symbol that criminals would be afraid of. Batman has become this symbol. All his mystery, and even the fact that he did not kill anyone, drove the entire Gotham underworld into fear.
Now, when this symbol was "trampled" and all the mystery vanished, I had to get rid of it. And, apparently, as he himself counted, from Bruce Wayne too.
And since crime will never stop, then this time we need some even more terrible symbol.
In general, it seems to me that this is at the end and there is Bruce himself, who began to use the fear toxin. You could say this is a mixture of scarecrow and batman. But not a villain. Like.

what if no one is using anything and it's just a residual effect after the events of the game? well, that is, all the local badgays are covered from fear that they might come and the remnants of the toxin inspire them with universal evil

The police themselves, IMHO, use the scarecrow toxin, the Batman is no longer there.

[quote name = 'Re-ally' timestamp = '1435849722' post = '4882183'] In general, it seems to me that this at the end is Bruce himself, who started using the fear toxin. You could say this is a mixture of scarecrow and batman. But not a villain. Like. [/ quote]

I also think there is a toxin involved

just not sure if it's Bruce as Batman 

It seems to me that Azrael was at the end, only not the one who was in the game, but the first one.

It even looks a bit like it.

God yes Bruce is

digging where everything is already on the surface 

Easter egg at the end

[textspoiler]

Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment has removed the PC version of Batman: Arkham Knight from sale until everything works as expected. Be that as it may, this does not prevent some owners of the game on the slopes and PCs from continuing to go through the main campaign of the final chapter of the series.

As it became known to Gamebomb.ru, some gamers have already reached the ending and know how Batman's story will end. And the most attentive of them discovered an unusual Easter egg that originates from Batman: Arkham City, which was released back in 2011.

Arkham City fans were able to find the easter egg in the game only three years after the release. In the fall of 2014, gamers reported that visiting the Calendar Man in his dungeon, rewinding the date on the computer on December 13, 2004, the day Rocksteady was founded, in order to listen to the previously unknown villain speech. While behind bars for the holidays, one of the most dangerous criminals declared that "the end is near," and that he "was there from the very beginning and will be there when everything is over."

Then everyone thought that the developers were hinting at their own history of the development of the Batman Arkham series. But actually the Calendar Man was talking about himself. The culprit did appear in the final moments of Batman: Arkham Knight history, watching the game's ending. As Gamebomb.ru found out, the Calendar Man did not cheat. Moreover, the developers knew how Batman's story would end even during the development of Arkham City.

[/ textspoiler]

Well, xs, it's somehow stupid to fake your death in order to become Batman again, even if using the Scarecrow toxin.

In addition, "KnightFall" is a comic book plot in which Bane defeated Batman-Bruce, and after this defeat Azrael became Batman.

lol

[spoil] Should have kept jumping on rooftops when everyone else knows who Batman really is? or what would you suggest? [/ spoil]

modders, well, create a thread with spoilers, well, think of hiding it or something like that, you can see everything on the main page 

[quote name = 'Lace' timestamp = '1436113278' post = '4884997'] In addition, "KnightFall" is the plot of the comics in which Bane defeated Batman-Bruce, and after this defeat Azrael became Batman. [/ quote]

So what? It's just a name, "knight's fall", it can be applied to a lot of things, Rocksteady may not even think about this comic series when the name of the protocol was given, simply because this phrase itself suits the given situation well.

Also. I saw a lot of discontent about the Scarecrow on the network, but I still can't understand it. As for me, in the role of the antagonist he showed himself very well, yes, there was a lot of pathos, but in fact, as they say, he did not throw "cheap show-offs", he really put Gotham on his knees, almost ruined it by filling it with gas (and would continue, if not for the Knight), as promised, in fact, he brought Bats to his knees, and really killed him (just as a symbol, not Wayne himself, of course). Yes, in the end he was humiliated himself, but what else could you expect? After all that he has done, it would be strange if he got off with a simple slap on the head. Here the Knight is already another matter: as they say - they started for health, but finished ... At first he really looked interesting, but in the end he slipped into some kind of uncontrollable hysteria,

had to keep jumping on rooftops when everyone else knows who Batman really is?

Well, yes. From the fact that Batman ceases to be a "myth / legend", he will not become weaker, and the villains will not stop receiving cabbage soup from him.

+ after the Scarecrow is defeated, you can talk to the police / civilian / firefighters at the station. Half of them say that they don't care who you are, the main thing is that you are Batman, and the other half do not believe that he is Bruce.

just a good reference, why not actually

  [quote name = 'reptail' timestamp = '1436114245' post = '4885016'] At first it really looked interesting [/ quote] the knight immediately began to whine and the further, the more

it would be much better if his identity remained undisclosed 

[quote name = 'Lace' timestamp = '1436114332' post = '4885018'] Well yes. From the fact that Batman ceases to be a "myth / legend", he will not become weaker, and the villains will not stop receiving cabbage soup from him. [/ quote]

 clearly understood

Well, yes. From the fact that Batman ceases to be a "myth / legend", he will not become weaker, and the villains will not stop receiving cabbage soup from him.

 clearly understood

Not well, but what? This whole theme with the image is a bit arbitrary, especially for the game. Local bandyugans are practically not afraid of him anyway (only in predator mode they get a little scared when there are few of them, but this does not affect anything).

It is possible, of course, that he faked his death in order to protect his loved ones, but this move is somehow not logical, because that will prevent his enemies from doing them harm after "his death."

By the way, I liked the Arkham Knight only after they revealed his identity, or more precisely, when he saves Bruce. At the beginning of the game, he is only cool because he knows how Batman works and where his weaknesses are. So he is not very good, because he constantly runs away, as he sees Batman.

So, after all, they never said how the second Robin came to life? Pit of Lazarus, as in the canon, go?

[member = 'Bergamot'], as I understand it, Jokir didn't kill Todd in the end and misled Bruce about his death.

Although I could be wrong.

So, after all, they never said how the second Robin came to life?

Did they show us how he stopped breathing straight? Here is the answer to the question, in my opinion.

[quote name = "Bergamot" post = "4885049" timestamp = "1436117216"] So, they never said how the second Robin came to life? Pit Lazarus as canon go? [/ Quote] Watch the cartoon Batman: the red cap

[member = 'PomaST'], Rocksteady has its own universe. It looks like the joker really tricked Bruce by recording Tod's death. It's just not clear how long ago it was and why only now he showed up. Well, yes, in the cartoon he had better motivation than in the game, "you couldn't kill him even after my death", there will be more tears in the game.

Although the additions about ras al ghula may be associated with Tod, it seems to me more that he just did not kill him.