The writers you \ "discovered \"
For example, I somehow did not perceive Hemenguei and Faulkner before. I read it, not so long ago, but it was not impressive. ... Now he took it up again, and, as if overwhelmed, the attitude completely changed. That their literary "salt", which I did not notice, seemed to be on the surface. Before that, he also "discovered" Tolstoy and Bunin.Have you ever had such cases when something seems to flip in your brain and you start to admire things that you haven't perceived for a long time?
Have you ever had such cases when something seems to flip in your brain and you start to admire things that you haven't perceived for a long time?
Everything is a little different with me ... but there is something in common ... it often happened before that I opened some obviously good book ... read a couple of pages and closed it for several years ... and not because I didn't like it at all ... but because I just physically could not read it ... some kind of internal stopper ...
Face control at one time did not pass: Hesse, Meyrink, Joyce, Nietzsche, Kerouac ... and others -that ... xs, what were the reasons for this ... but after a while I read them voraciously ... such are the things ... (=
Psychodolb
This, in fact, is the subject.
Often, this happens not only with literature.
Many things are perceived in the context of life experience. I answered "subject"?
Partially. Life experience, it allows you to evaluate the semantic component of the book. But such a thing as the style of writing, the special unique language of the author, is often difficult to perceive. At the same time, as an idea, the meaning of thought in a work is simply striking in its truthfulness and clarity. These are the kind of docks.
With experience, vocabulary increases, and if you have difficulty understanding the author's language, then read the translation.
I'm not talking about individual words (that's another thing), but about the style of writing, which is unique for every standing writer. Someone, for example, does not like the acrimony of Nabokov, or the straightforwardness of Hemenguei.
The sun is in the palm of your hand, please explain why I do not understand such great Russian writers as Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Bulgakov and others? I read them and do not grasp the real meaning of what they have written. When I read War and Peace, the whole love affair in the book got on my nerves, but I liked it when the war was going on. When I read The Idiot, I wondered why they called him an idiot, because he was a normal person. I also don't understand the language of Zelazny and Kuttner. Why?
The sun is in the palm of your hand, please explain why I do not understand such great Russian writers as Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Bulgakov and others?
You need to come to the classics. Try to tackle them later.
"Idiot", I wondered why they called him an idiot, because he was a normal person.
A person who is not spoiled by the pragmatism of civilization.
When I read War and Peace, the whole love affair in the book got on my nerves, but I liked it when the war was going on.
:) This is always the case, when someone has not grasped the salt of this book, he reads either only family relationships or war and politics, depending on the sexes.
Yes, Bykov is good, if there was a desire, he would write excellent works and not on military topics.
I never dared to read the books of Vasily Ershov, but now I read with particular interest. I advise you to read! Very interesting books "Fear of Flight", "Aerophobia" and his other books.