The darkness ii

from other developers - not rub.
The first was excellent.

from other developers - not rub.
The first was excellent.

The First Darkness is a masterpiece. Literally recently, everyone was remembered in the thread :).

Such, of course, offense and sadness - are not done by Starbreezes, and, remembering the recent biotresh two, I am afraid of the same pancake lumpy from digital extremes.
Time will judge.

The First Darkness is a masterpiece. Literally recently, everyone was remembered in the thread :).

Such, of course, offense and sadness - are not done by Starbreezes, and, remembering the recent biotresh two, I am afraid of the same pancake lumpy from digital extremes.
Time will judge.

The first part is a dull fake with a good plot, and since the script for the second part is written by the same scriptwriter, I think the fans of the first part will not be discouraged by the game

Nothing like this. I did not notice any sadness there. The game was just gorgeous. For Starbreeze. But the second the devil knows ...

[b] ACE [/ b], the first part, one of the best carrent games, you cho: facepalm:

[b] gameskiller37 [/ b], I do not impose my opinion on what I wish on you

[b] ACE [/ b], I just don't understand how you can call this game dull: banghead:

[b] gameskiller37 [/ b],
levels are empty, 2 and a half pieces, there is nothing to do there. separate epic feil - levels in the "first world"
graphics - low polygonal, little details, curve animation, nafik show gg so close, if it was animated through the back, the first world in general as starting projects ps2.
gameplay - skunky shootouts. there is no fan, so usually you kill everyone so quickly that you do not have time to get kaif. ai bad, so there is no fan. Snakes get bored with killing quickly, since there are not very many kill animations, and purely gameplay mechanics are not very well developed. coupled with a dull level design and a monstrous World War I, the
only plus of the game is the plot, and sometimes the music is ok

[b] ACE [/ b], you basically have all your complaints related to graphics ...
hence the question, did you play darkness at the start in 2007? or later?

The first one is cool. Only there is one trendy feature.

There are several moments in the game in which you can - you will go wrong, and the whole game will fall into such a cycle and in principle it will be impossible to go through it. You can't go back (maybe the script worked), and boot too - the autosave worked.
There are three or four such places in the game, I personally got into two, and did not pass because of this. One of them is when after 1/3 of the game you get to the port, almost to the end.

This speaks of a certain curvature of the developers: D

[size = 85] [color = green] Added after 5 minutes 9 seconds: [/ color] [/ size]

Strange as it may seem, more events from the third volume of comics.
Classic and new enemies, Angelus for example.
And you can add investigations, but this is unlikely, since Witchblade is unlikely to be included in the game.

I went through the first part 3 times, the game was cool! but only one minus is the first world war zombie soldiers were such bullshit did then it didn’t need to be done then they spoiled the experience of the game, and the rest was super in the city there was such a cool atmosphere in the subway it was cool graphics was cool! I'm waiting for the second part, I hope that there won't be any first worlds, although after playing Dark Sector I don't know I don't know what will happen to the game, well, we'll wait and see.

[Quote] but only one minus is the First World War, the zombie soldiers were made such bullshit [/ quote]
well, actually, it's a real hell in which wars are forever frozen and the atmosphere is very diluted
[offtopic] I wanted to write just like you, but could not: sad : [/ offtopic]

[b] gameskiller37 [/ b], in fact, in addition to the graphics, I have complaints about the gameplay and the structure of the levels. did you read my last post completely? good gameplay with bad graphics is tolerable, but vice versa - no. Wandering around the empty city of darkness is boring, and the First World War is even more boring.
and I bought the game at the start right away. as a fan of Riddick. Already from the very beginning I did not like it, but how I got to the First World War I vomited at all. sold the disc and returned to the game only a few years later (borrowed it from a friend), as he wanted to know how the story ended. As a result, I liked it more during the second playthrough, apparently because I did not use patichat in 2007, but, as I said, with live any trash immediately goes better)))

World War I is one of the coolest levels in shooters. Those who did not understand the metaphorical nature of the story and did not listen to what the soldiers were saying are his problems. From this level I was delighted, like a revived picture, some kind.

Well, what else is there, before the pokatuski from Heilo, you cho.

treshak, of course, where does he care about Kaim's ass: brash:

[b] gameskiller37 [/ b], trololo? you can at least crap the entire list of my favorite games. who cares? you asked - I answered. but in general, yes, darkness is a crooked treshachok made with a meager budget. as I said of the pros, only the plot and a couple of tracks. I expected more from the creators of riddick. Asalt company he is dark athena by the way, too, not ok. let's see what they do for EA.

you like to rubbish good games, not me, so forgive me, to the wrong address (((

[b] gameskiller37 [/ b], come on. look at your last post))) you just trolled, and I expressed my opinion without a drop of trolism. good or bad play is a matter of taste. I argued my opinion.