Is it worth changing the processor
There is an i7 4770 (without K) and I already feel how its runoff frequencies are not enough, hence the question whether it is worth changing it to a processor with the K index? Or did I make it all up?frying13666
Why, I wonder, is this processor missing?
I have a Xeon E3-1240 v3 (the same 4770, but without a video core) and it is enough for me for everything.
frying13666 Invented
everything. Judging by ferra.ru tests, for top video cards (980 Ti) a processor with a frequency of 4 GHz is desirable - http://www.ferra.ru/photo/system/review/how-to-choose-cpu-for-gaming-pc -october-2015/24927/458557 /
For simpler cards, such as GTX 950, and 3 GHz is enough - http://www.ferra.ru/photo/system/review/how-to-choose-cpu-for- gaming-pc-october-2015/24927/458558 /
The problem may be that the i7 4770, as far as I hear, has poor quality thermal paste under the lid. She does not manage the temperature well. It is possible that the processor is overheating, especially if the case has poor ventilation or a weak cooler.
Purple giraffe
I’m going to change the card later, it turns out the processor will no longer be enough ...
frying13666
If you still change the vidyahu, and with it the percent, you will have to change your mother, memory. It's easier then to sell the system unit and take everything new from scratch.
The purple giraffe
Gospadi is where this crazy Tets comes from, this percentage in modern games is loaded by a maximum of 40 percent, and Core i5 processors will be more than enough for the eyes for the future generation of video cards.
No, I'm seriously asking guys. If I'm planning an upgrade to 980ti, will this processor be enough for me or not? I don’t troll.
I heard that the arma cheerfully loads the processor.
6 fps difference. But overclocking requires a motherboard and cooling. and a power supply, perhaps.
if initially you did not collect pitch for overclocking, is it worth the candle?
try not to play games at all for a week and not turn on the computer ... you have insanity, only if you don't play 4k, and even then ..
frying13666
Enough. In some games, you may get 3-5 frames less, but what's the difference - 70 or 73? The power of the 980 Ti will impress you anyway.
Here are 2 articles comparing the processors of the last 5 years:
http://fcenter.ru/online/hardarticles/processors/38708-Pyat_pokolenij_Core_i7_ot_Sandy_Bridge_do_Skylake_Sravnitel_noe_testirovanie
http://www.ferra.ru/ru/experridge-sreview/ru/experridge-sreview -vs-skylake /
it may not be enough only for the disclosure of MGPU systems, and then if you need 60 clearly fps and not less fps.
for everything except a couple of games, it should be 60+, the
mentioned 980 is far from always steadily dragging games at 60fps
if it’s not enough, maybe it’s worth switching to lga2011-3. there are many cores and overclocking for all civil processors and video cards is weighty.
in full chd on this cp, I think you can safely hang some hypothetical 1080 and humiliate it with anti-aliasing and an ultraphone for a year and a half - a couple of years.
Therefore, it makes sense to change a similar cp to K or take a system with 7 6700k or why I don’t see any sense for money.
Sam Smith
It would be something, without overclocking it is at the level of a5 in games