3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
t
timofej2907 10.11.21 05:39 pm

64-bit system is not installed

I don't have a 64-bit system (Windows 7 max.)
Maybe it's because I have 2 GB of RAM.
Please help me with this problem (I can't solve it for 2-3 years) :)
25 Comments
Sort by:
V
VITYA_KOLYADENKO 10.11.21

timofej2907
What kind of percent, for example?

-
-SK.art- 10.11.21

timofej2907

First, voice the characteristics of the PC.
And secondly, why do you need 64-bit Windows with such a small amount of RAM?)

t
timofej2907 10.11.21

-Sergey Viktorovich-
PC characteristics
Windows 7 max.
2 RAM Soon 4
Intel (R) Pentium (R) D CPU 3.40GHz 2 cores
NVIDIA GeForce 6200
Asus P5B motherboard

K
Kryogen 10.11.21

timofej2907
why with such hardware 64 bits? there's no point

F
Feshromb 10.11.21

RAM from 4GB and more - x64. Less than 4GB - x32

E
Eroppo 10.11.21

Feshromb
Even with 4 GB, it's not a fact that you need to install x64 - the system will see 4 GB, not 3.5, but at the same time it will eat more

X
X_ray_83 10.11.21

timofej2907
Put everything there
Oh
Ten RAM needs 6-8 gig

E
Eroppo 10.11.21

X_ray_83 wrote: A
dozen of RAM needs 6-8 gig
That 8, that 10 are optimized in this regard much better and they consume less than the divine 7. It has long been confirmed that even on ancient hardware, they work faster than even xp, not to mention 7

d
drag - fire 10.11.21

eroppo
10 eats more RAM, that's where the speed of work comes from, 7 is less gluttonous.

E
Eroppo 10.11.21

drag - fire
From my own experience - mothers on a laptop with 2 GB of RAM put 10 x32 instead of 7 x32 and the brakes in general became really less

a
antibiotic90 10.11.21

X_ray_83
Delirium. On my old laptop with 4 GB of RAM, win10 flies.

a
antibiotic90 10.11.21

And about the top, I agree with:
Kryogen
Feshromb

a
antibiotic90 10.11.21

timofej2907
As will be 4 GB of RAM, put win7 x64.

V
Vasek Vasekk 10.11.21

On 7-ke only idiots sit backward from progress.
Installing 10 32 bits on all calculators (ala Atoms 1.6) - it is faster than the outdated 7 and uses resources better.
7 is a piece of manure in 2016 - this is already in fact HP in 2010 in terms of status.

b
bazilews 10.11.21

timofej2907
It will not be installed, for a 64-bit system you need 4 GB of memory at least !!!

a
antibiotic90 10.11.21

Vasek Vasekk
Ie in your opinion, everything new is better than the old, right?

b
bazilews 10.11.21

I also like 10 and I am not going to return to 8, and even more so to 7 !!!

V
Vasek Vasekk 10.11.21

antibiotic90
Everything new is progress. With this approach to business, you would continue to run with a digging stick and wipe yourself with a stone through the caves.

X
X_ray_83 10.11.21

eroppo
No, it consumes less whist 64 there at least 1.5 gig, 7 and 10 already need 2-8 gig. And this is still noticeable in games when the game flies on whist and slows down on the seven.

E
Eroppo 10.11.21

X_ray_83
Well, in any case, about any 6-8 GB of speech and does not come close. As an example, I can cite a report from Aida (this morning until lunchtime): W10 x64 and a bunch of background and working programs, the maximum memory consumption for all the time is 4.3 GB. The minimum is 2GB. And in x32, these values ​​are an order of magnitude less.
Spoiler