Such is the pvp-meta (Diablo 2)
To remove all questions about passive tactics, anti-charms, etc. Pvp can be played on absolutely identical charms. Presumably on magpies, because this class has its own teleport.win:
1. Everything is very balanced. Well, maybe randomly jump to lightning or fb, but he is like that.
2. Absolutely no gear. You can do with a wiper, wizard spike, clean ck (or without them), etc. No wigs, mf, etc. are needed.
3. Absolutely everyone will be able to play pvp. (read item 2)
cons:
1. Limited classes.
2. Checking the integrity of the players regarding the build and gear is stressful. That is, this is an option on parole. It's better not to play with chickens and dogs.
It seems like an interesting idea, xs.
Chainreactor
ofk. lags only help there. if you understand the peculiarity of pvpg, then its lags = your lags, and not just his.
This is a feature of all Blizzard games of those times before the release of wc3.
Here the skill of the one who is used to playing in lags already decides, and the one who lags the offc higher is the skill to play with them.
Obsessed wrote:
and one more thing - the passion for pvp is passing.
And before q2 I had nothing, apart from occasional nicks in computer clubs. And nevertheless, the passion for pvp did not come and, it seems, is not even going to.
SpoilerAnd the reason is that I find this kind of competition not overwhelming, but overwhelming emotionally. And the truth is, Mother Nature did not endow me with the feeling of the highest satisfaction that is widespread in people, which is achieved at the moment of crushing my opponent, visible or invisible; this is sometimes the hunting fervor and the primitive triumphant feelings of excitement, which arises when the prey is overtaken. And besides that, what else can I see in the bloody ritual, where one stands opposite the other, where one of the two will inevitably leave today offended, crushed? This situation contributes only to the desire of the loser to compensate for his bitterness not on someone else, but on the "offender" with whom the loser has just had the honor to compete. For this, mutual hostility is born, and woe to all present, if the players who came to be satisfied with the duel are not educated enough to refrain from mutual insults. That is not always, of course, this is the case, but very often the participants poison each other's souls with impartial statements - like the creeping poison of insult mortifies the joy of the victor, and makes the fate of the loser even worse. And what is moral here? - a thoughtful reader will ask. But there is no such thing here, because all of the above is the essence of human nature, and until we are brought up and we are not imbued with mutual respect for each other, no one will be a real winner in these senseless fights. but very often the participants poison each other's souls with impartial statements - like the creeping poison of insult mortifies the joy of the victor, and makes the fate of the loser even worse. And what is moral here? - a thoughtful reader will ask. But there is no such thing here, because all of the above is the essence of human nature, and until we are brought up and we are not imbued with mutual respect for each other, no one will be a real winner in these senseless fights. but very often the participants poison each other's souls with impartial statements - like the creeping poison of insult mortifies the joy of the victor, and makes the fate of the loser even worse. And what is moral here? - a thoughtful reader will ask. But there is no such thing here, because all of the above is the essence of human nature, and until we are brought up and we are not imbued with mutual respect for each other, no one will be a real winner in these senseless fights.
Episcop_moo, the spoiler is clear, I double with both hands. : D True, at that age, I didn’t want to get into priests in q2. well, when I got fucked, of course. ;-)
Dosmotr wrote:
You are completely mistaken here,
you can read it as "you did not develop correctly, I will tell you how it should have been"? : D
Dosmotr
And in what am I mistaken? I just wrote that for me personally, winning is rarely an end in itself (and not that it is good or bad, it is necessary or not, etc.). Well, I have such a character. And since I still won't get any noticeable satisfaction from the victory, the only thing that remains for me from pvp is the one that follows the fight. See an example in the adjacent topics.
In general, playing against players in network games is interesting, but the fact that I have an end in itself is idiocy for others. I remember that in ut2004 I tried to play, I even looked at the sprite of the planet in the sky and it flew in to me :). Well, or there in the old man he raised the base, hid, the first zerglings of the enemy come running and that type, lol, cho for nafig, where is everyone? Well, and other drug addiction in the same spirit. Even when I play chess with friends, I protect the horses at all costs, because the figures are beautiful, and therefore I quickly lose.
Need to fuck!
So a subject like that. That the game in pvp, regardless of its goals in itself, is associated with serious investments of a human resource. And not everyone has the time and enthusiasm. Although in itself such a game is more interesting than the baalrans. So I offered some kind of option.
Episcop_moo, when I do my level for Q3, I drive there with a bot, suddenly I see a jamb, I stop, I think how to redo it and it flies to me. :-)
We must do it!
damn it! (((
Inspection of me recently reminds me:
you did not develop correctly, I will tell you how it should have been
QLinkee, hmm .. but he reminded me, when last night people wanted to go off to the off, and he sharply discouraged Inspection .. :-) the topic was mowed, ofc.
Obsessed wrote:
he was discouraged
harshly. I did not discourage anyone. The person simply did not develop correctly, or rather did not even want to at all. And you literally spoon-fed him when you gave instructions with screenshots. Disservice.
Dosmotr wrote:
Chel just developed incorrectly
"and here it is again!" ©; D i.e. you are so smart to tell everyone how they need to play in q2, what to love, right? ;-)
[edit] in short, fircax, log in! ; D
Dosmotr
sometimes show-off (read piskomerstvo) as a "male reproductive organ" (c) a long 50 cm - there is something to boast about, but there is no use = (
Episcop_moo wrote:
And the reason is that I find this kind of competition not overwhelming, but overwhelming emotionally. And the truth is, Mother Nature did not endow me with the feeling of the highest satisfaction that is widespread in people, which is achieved at the moment of crushing my opponent, visible or invisible; this is sometimes the hunting enthusiasm and the primal triumphant feelings of excitement, which arises when the prey is overtaken. And besides that, what else can I see in the bloody ritual, where one stands opposite the other, where one of the two will inevitably leave today offended, crushed? ...
Victory breeds hatred, the
defeated lives in sorrow.
The calm lives in happiness,
who has refused victory and defeat.
(c) Siddhartha Gautama
Obsessed
Obsessed wrote:
"here it goes again!" ©; D i.e. you are so smart to tell everyone how they need to play in q2, what to love, right? ;-)
No you. People notice in others those "shortcomings" that are in themselves. Think about what you are writing and why - you are just unknowingly trying to beat me in "quake-3" on this forum.
Dima Bessik
The only measure of length is the result or the result.
You do not need to take part in the tournament, so as not to hand over the hums to the Probe (c)
Everything else is chickens, dobirs, hares .. If you are a fan of measuring, you must win against everyone, if not, say so: "I play to build turrets and protect the knights (c) "
Dosmotr wrote:
you are just unknowingly trying to beat me in "quake-3" on this forum.
SCHO? % -)