Server complaints (Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas)

Children's babble, there is no such thing as perfect. I remember you, but there were no cookies, just like Lop_Dance.
Am I a Malicious Intruder? Well, let’s throw arrows, I’m talking about the administrator’s jambs, and she points me to mine, did I come here to write a complaint about myself? I wrote specifically to a certain admin, for certain of his jambs, and you have already dragged in everything that is possible, do not forget to write how I drove on red or how I drove through the oncoming lane (in the game). By the way, a screen in the studio where I insulted the admin, tk. I insulted the players and more than once and I do not deny it, but where am I, when it comes to him, throw a screen and see how I insulted him.

"they administer in my image and likeness."
- Smells like something, exactly! This is pathos =) Well, yes, still childish babble. I don't care how you taught them the master. "
I see that I was punished according to a rule that does not exist, which is an excess of authority, well, I will not list about other jambs, because the corn will soon be rubbed, repeating the same thing ..

"I think this only says how since you're new to the server, come and look at everything from your new bell tower. "
- The paths went into business, it is not understood in what meaning. And you don't need to think, you need to know. The turkey thought too ..

"And once again I explain to you that we do not have penalties for the account, we do not have mandatory registration, therefore this item is not spelled out in the rules. The rules are drawn up and focused on one specific person, and it does not matter how many nicknames and IPs he has. Therefore, leaving from one nickname and switching to another is considered bypassing the punishment. With the same success, as you are now defending your account, cheaters can act. If 1 nickname is banned, then you can go in and cheat under another. I think you you yourself will not be happy. "
- Cheaters should be banned by ip and nothing more. As for the first lines: Do you know one golden rule of all the rules? What is not prohibited is permitted. And for this, if the rules do not forbid me to do this, then I do it, everything is logical and simple. Listen to yourself from the outside:
You are punished for the rules, which are not in the rules, this is of course nonsense, but we do not care, we are stubborn. You just have to come up with an unspoken rule.The admin is always right, otherwise there is no rule for this yet, and you already behave like this, not wanting to agree with more than one, even the most obvious accusation, carrying childish babble that insults are not insults , inaction is work, ridicule and ignore - this is for you in the report, in the chat you do not need, otherwise the earth will probably explode, etc.

"Regarding the spawn-kill from the administrator, I certainly did not see the game itself, but I dare to assume that it was not, because spawn-kill is when you kill a player standing on the respawn point during the first 5-6 seconds, which given to the player to wake up, pick up the "gun" and rush into battle. And since he was not planted by an auto script, it means that there was no such violation. "
- respawn (zone) and respawn point (a specific point in a zone) are different things (as indicated in brackets, earlier) about "mego" admin Olesya: DD, I was talking about respawn. It would not be bad to allocate a respawn zone and put a dm-zone in it, so that there would be no such mass murder on respawns.

"You can write to the playground, or to the president, but nothing will change from that. Because the administrators who are tasked with dealing with the violators of the servers answer you in this topic."
- In this world, everything is possible and there are no irreplaceable ones.

"PS and yes, I did not notice direct questions from you, except for those to which 3 administrators have already told you the same thing. And if you still do not understand, your words, screenshots and complaints are not enough to prove the guilt of this administrator. "
- Well, of course, everything is very clear to me, namely your high intellectual level, prudence, ability to read and highlight the main thing, and of course I especially appreciate your ability not to see and deny proven facts and accusations. Adios

Good ... no one holds you, if you say that you have been playing for a long time and you are a super-cool hacker who parses spawn kill, then why don’t you know Olesya, there is only one conclusion, you are just an upstart who wants to show himself as someone among the players, all the best ...

divnet, and I'm telling you that the players playing now under the tag "cookies" were already then and long before that, wearing the tag fans a month ago does not make them incompetent beginners. As for Lap_dens, well, I personally know him for over a year.
Nobody throws arrows here. I'm just trying to explain to you the attitude of the administration towards you, in view of your tone and violations on the server. If you initially did everything as it should be and kept yourself in control, then it would not have resulted in such a shit on the forum.

If you are so tight, excuse me, I will explain to you on specific points how and for what you were punished. Clause 4.5. "The administrator independently decides what is considered a violation of these rules," says that the administrator has the right to decide that your restart under a different nickname is a violation of the current rules. Clause 4.6. "The administration independently chooses penalties and validity periods for each specific case of violation," says that the administrator independently decides what type of punishment to apply for you in this case.
Now I hope you understand that you were punished according to the current rules.

Now let's see what does not suit you in my interpretation of the concept of "respawn". Excerpt from wikipedia:
Respawn (correct pronunciation - "rispon", [rispn]; English respawn, rebirth) - in computer games, the place of constant appearance of an object or character of the game world, occurring at a certain point (respawn point) of the game space ...
I do not see the word "zone" in the well-known reference book. Conclusion, just the same you do not correctly interpret this concept. A script is installed on the server to automatically punish a spawn-kill if you kill a player earlier than 5 seconds from the moment of his objection to the spawn point, the killing one will be imprisoned. So this accusation of the administrator does not channel. And yes, I am a megoadmin ^^.

The last time I say that everything that you provided here as evidence of the misuse of your position by the administrator did not confirm itself during the consideration of the application. The complaint is unsubstantiated.

1. [ACC] Stimul_Mamki
2. gta.ru:7777
3. [IIe4eHbKu] LaP_DaNcE
4. Kicks for nickname. I don't see a problem in the nickname. He does not bear any insults. The admin argues with a violation of censorship, how long has the word Mamka been obscene? The nickname was created in the same way as the player [AGC] Father_Stimulus, he has no complaints, as I asked him about it when creating the nickname. The decoding of my fan clan is as follows - amoral cute cock - amoral cute cock. but Mom's incentive because I don't have a father and my whole childhood was raised by Mom, a sort of Mama's son. I think the actions of the administrator are not fully justified and require a broad response on this matter.

[ACC] Stimul_Mamki, the tag has an offensive meaning, I don't like the nickname either.
Violation of the rules:
3.3. It is forbidden to use "nicknames", "tags", names of communities and other user organizations that contain offensive and / or obscene words;
Administrator rights, in this situation:
4.4. The administrator reserves the right to give his own, final linguistic assessment of the conformity of any phrases and words, "nicknames", "tags" and names of communities and user organizations.
4.5. The administrator independently decides what is considered a violation of these rules.
4.6. The administration independently chooses penalties and validity periods for each specific case of violation.

hip66
GTA.ru Team DeathMatch (0.3x)
[GraF_FiTy] DesTroYer
It feels like he's a schoolboy. In VK I threatened to ban and today I decided to ban with the reason obb, although this is my first nickname. Do you have a personal dislike for the ban now? Well you are a brave server then! I'll tell everyone about it, including on my website about it-technologies. Shame on you!

killerusha
In which VK, what are you talking about? Yesterday, with a full set of cheats, I ran around the server, bypassed the ban 15 times, and now you pose as an innocent sheep.

So I can provide evidence of threats from this inadequate administrator.

killerusha
Of course, let me be, I’m wondering what you’ll provide if you don’t have anything, and no one threatened you. You are stupid trolling, I could have been better prepared, there is one lie in the complaint, which is easy to check, for example, your nickname (as you write the first one) Through chat logs you can see that there have been complaints from players about you, you changed your nickname 5 times (nickname changed, but the subnet is the same) You, as a person who, as it were, owns a site about it-technologies (which I personally doubt) should know this. So in this situation, you are more like a "schoolboy" who has been bombed from the fact that he can no longer cheat on the server.

killerusha
Well, where is the evidence? The administrator who banned you, as you can see, does not mind.

And you are not banned because of personal hostility, but for cheats.

1.Da_Tweekaz
2.Dynamics
3.gta.ru:7778
4.17.02.14
5.Jackass
Well, of course, it's easier to refuse than to admit your guilt. A man

and an unreasonable ban, where is the discussion of your actions? PS: [19:07:07] Da_Tweekaz {FFFFFF} (11): so from spec *

[19:07:07] _ACheroN_ has entered on the Deagle + Shotgun duel zone (/ duel)

[19:07:13] _ACheroN_ {FFFFFF} (23): hello

[19:07:14] Jeka_SalnikoFF {FFFFFF} (21): go here pals

[19:07:17] [IIe4eHbKu] Jackass {FFFFFF} (17): not from spec

[19: 07:18] Jeka_SalnikoFF has entered on the Deagle + Shotgun duel zone (/ duel)

[19:07:37] Da_Tweekaz {FFFFFF} (11):

get rid of the loss as you like [19:07:38] Jeka_SalnikoFF has entered on the Deagle + Shotgun duel zone (/ duel)

[19:07:38] Ray_Charles has entered on the Deagle + Shotgun duel zone (/ duel)

[19:07:40] [KwK] Mr. Nick has entered on the Deagle + Shotgun duel zone (/ duel)

[19: 07:47] _ACheroN_ {FFFFFF} (23): jekaa

Benjamin.
Oh yes, you know better. Yesterday you yelled that we were "girls": D
You look bolder, finally wrote a complaint openly, and did not run like a rat the third time cherry was crying. MAN!
You should have given you a ban for discussion back then, when you whined because of your jealousy that I was giving Lera a spawn.
At the expense of the killer before the ban, let them lay out the logs to you, where it will be confirmed that I did not leave the spec near you, after which I killed.

once again for the gifted, where did you see the discussion?

or you mean you acknowledge your action in this way)

Benjamin.
one post is not given to write, is not it?
[19:07:37] Da_Tweekaz {FFFFFF} (11): otmazyvatsya loss as you like
I should have excused myself in front of you or what?
You decided that I left the spec and killed you on purpose, I saw it as a discussion of my actions as an administrator.

then you admit this fact, since you regarded it as a discussion of your actions as an administrator.

Benjamin.
The administrator decides for himself what is a violation of the rules, just as he himself decides what punishment to apply to any of the violations. As you know, this is the rule.
As for the complaint itself, if you really want to, then I will send you logs about the fact that Jakas was not in spec, about your violations, etc. Which I warned you about more than once, and this led to the ban.
In general, the complaint is not substantiated. But, I believe that the punishment applied to you is severe. You are unbanned.

And this is the first and last time when I unban you like that. warned you.

1. [VD] BARADA]
2. gta.ru death match
3. jackass
4. Gave a ban for mate. I know perfectly well that the administration has the right to choose the punishment itself, but banned for mate? Not too much?

The administrator is obliged to be fair and adequate, to set an example for the players by his behavior. What example does this administrator set?

BARADAAA




It's easier for me to ban you once than to stir you up 100 times, as you put it.

Jackass_ Is
it easier for you? This is not correct, you have shown yourself to be a bad administrator.
Olesya ...
This is the face of the administration ... What kind of adequate behavior can we talk about in this case.

BARADAAA, and I have not been admin for a long time, so catch another .i.

PS And to whom did Jakas show himself as a bad administrator? Chtoli in front of you?