Inhibition theory
---A.Soldier of Light
Isn't it time to unify everything else? For example, sockets ...
It doesn't make sense.
Mayamenstate
And your "Omelet Theory" has less success than the previous ones. She tries to seem like something more than she really is, so it's probably better not to create topics with a claim to intelligence.
A.Soldier of Light
What is this? What for? From the principle "if only not like everyone else"? Explain to me.
Well, in a society where banality prevails, the desire for extraneousness is also commonplace. Well, if we look at it from the standpoint "if only not like everyone else," then agree, any change that is accepted contrary to the established rules is adjusted to this framework, right? But if we look at it from a different point of view, namely from the position of convenience, then a different meaning is acquired, namely not the meaning "if only not like everyone else" but "it is more convenient for us". We cannot convince absolutely all people that one system is better. And besides, you yourself should understand that if you were originally brought up in a state with left-hand traffic, then as a result of the same programming it will be perceived as natural for you, although this natural is unnatural in other countries. And of course there is a world community, but each state has sovereignty over everything that concerns changes in its territorial space. In fact, we can reproach us Russians for using rubles, although the dollar and the euro are world currencies, and why should we use these rubles? Not to be like everyone else? To keep your individuality? Not at all, agree?
Isn't it time to unify everything else? For example, sockets ...
Well, you can also unify the legal system. People are people everywhere, why are there punishments everywhere for the same thing?
I personally do not see the point in unifying the sockets. Actually, what's the difference, what sockets, who uses? Tell me your opinion about their unification?
Garrus-1994
And besides , you yourself should understand that if you were originally brought up in a state with left-hand traffic, then as a result of the same programming it will be perceived as natural for you, although this natural is unnatural in other countries.
This is a subjective opinion, yes. But there is also an objective one, and adequate people see it. What they see: that their system, for example, left-hand traffic, is a rare case, while everywhere in the world, right-hand traffic. That is, it * they * stand apart, and not everyone else.
As for currency, there is no analogy, an unfortunate analogy. Currency emphasizes the nationality and independence of the state's economy. Here in Estonia they refused this and introduced the euro without asking the opinion of the people. This is wrong, but that's a different question. And what emphasizes left-hand traffic and the other socket outlet? :]
Sockets: so that I can immediately plug my device into an outlet in England without an adapter, or vice versa - their device into my outlet.
Well, you can still unify the legal system. People are people everywhere, why are there punishments everywhere for the same thing?
Good idea. I am especially surprised by the eternal disregard for cruel punishments, say, in Saudi Arabia. Death penalty, crucifixion, chopping off a limb or head .. this is the rule of law, and the West does not care. Don't care about their barbaric methods. But the West is very worried when someone is punished in Russia, for example, a pussy riot. What is it? Idiocy or something else? I think it's level 99 idiocy ...
A.Soldier of Light
That is, * they * stand apart, and not all the others.
Is it possible, or perhaps the fact that the world community just wants to impose it on them? After all, I have not heard that in such countries there is an increased accident rate in comparison with countries with right-hand traffic. Therefore, such a situation does not threaten the world community, which means there is no point in changing, which means it is an imposition, since there is no rational explanation for the change in the situation.
As for the currency - there is no analogy
Well, there is a dollar, and there is a euro. There are already two analogies) And then there is tenge: D
Currency emphasizes the nationality and independence of the state's economy.
No, the independence of the state in economic terms shows production, and money is a means of exchange, and if there is a unified monetary system, then is that worse? But this is pretty hard to achieve. In general, here it is like with a system of law. It also emphasizes nationality, one nation, let's say, is cruel, the other is more humane, but you think its unification is a good idea. A single currency can also be considered a good idea) Nationality is emphasized by socio-cultural characteristics, and everything else can be done as one.
And what emphasizes left-hand traffic and the other socket outlet? :]
Well, I have already partly written about the movement, but what about the outlets ... maybe the support of the companies producing them? I don't see any other explanation yet)) We have a great philosopher Maymenstate or something like his nickname. Ask him, he will tell you the theory of sockets: D
But the West is very worried when someone is punished in Russia
This is because we seem to position ourselves not as barbarians. And they are frightened by such a "cat in a poke".
The original version of the first post by the author:
“This is my theory of place and time, but viewed from a different angle.
There is something relevant, modern, but in the wrong place - the theory of place.
And there is something that is in that place, but not actual, not modern - the theory of time.
That is, in the first case, in terms of modernity, relevance, everything is fine, but the place was wrong.
And in the second case, in terms of location, everything is fine, but they were mistaken in time - this is no longer modern, not relevant.
So, isn't this one-sided ban on place in Russia just an attempt to put the "old things" in their places and, as they say, "cope" ... along the way, having dealt with everything modern and relevant, but not in place?
But the West, too, has a one-sided ban for the time: it prohibits everything "old" - everything that sucks, not modern, not relevant, regardless of whether it is in its place or not, and, accordingly, allows everything modern and the actual is out of place.
So which is better: "old", which is in its place, or modern and relevant, but not in its place? ... Russia or the West? "
