The single dies!!!
Single mode slowly dying in games,developers increasingly rely on multiplayer.For me personally it's bad,I love games with interesting and exciting plot,but not stupid mochilovo team.What do you think about this?
unbearable
intolerable wrote:
Well, considering the level of intellectual development
Oh, what an interesting statement! And you can see what the structures were made to study the level of intellectual development of the current generation? What is a representative distillation was used? Or, maybe it's your personal speculation? Then, again, it is interesting to know, from talking with some young people, and the circumstances in which you are the data received? Personally, I communicate a lot with students of Moscow colleges and Universities, and, you know, there is no degradation not observed. On the contrary, I see a lot of very smart, bright, erudite people. And I wonder on what basis you think the previous generation is smarter or better than anyone else? Maybe they are from a great mind water in front of the TV is charged? Or thorough understanding of the economic processes they made money in MMM to pass? Speaking of vysokomarochnogo...It's in the nineties we have a high morality triumphed? Or maybe the current state of Affairs in the country - the widespread kleptocracy - a sign of the results of long-term activities highly moral people?
intolerable wrote:
the excitement of marvel movies
Not clear who you're talking about: if for children, 10-14 years, then to accuse them of liking children's movies weird. And Split is a more adult film, and overall society, more adults accepted it quite warmly. And in General, you want the intelligence minobrazovaniya to measure? Let's just size. Do you have an as with Bergman? As with Buñuel? Kim-Ki Duk just reviewed? And th at Lynch with Kubrick? If you think that sympathy for Shyamalan - sign nedyuzhy intelligence, then you are greatly mistaken. This is a wonderful, but quite simple and a mass Director.
intolerable wrote:
the denial of books
Well, this is nonsense (basically, I all your arguments in your last post and painted - and about movies and about books; you say exactly what I described, it is surprising that you do not understand what we are talking about your manner of reasoning on this account), normal Teens these days read a lot, it's all a matter of your surroundings. And, again, you have the something like the reading? Kafka and Dostoevsky all just today? Kant with Machiavelli are not forgotten? Or more fantasy?
intolerable wrote:
The mass consumption of alcoholic beverages and tobacco products, you can enumerate a lot of confidence we can say that the present generation has degenerated.
That which surrounds you - obviously Yes. Sorry. Try to move to some place more decent and socialize with normal people.Due to the fact that the shameless idiots from previous generations have turned to the country a rather nasty place, they are becoming less - as the present generation is very smart and talented, a large part of the hurry to go abroad, where such people are always looking forward, but many still here.
Marmotskiy
Come to enlighten me to hatiti Sony? And something I had not noticed the reasons for this.
Pierre Dac
Duck read any govnors between consolers and pkshniki, or at least between shibayama and handicam. There all truth and you will know ;))
I personally for all formats, but to Sonya scene singles games (which are their exclusives) are still a high quality product. Many multiplatform titles type Assassina long descended into a conveyor Lajoie. But the recent gamers manage to smear the so-called kintz-myltse from Sony, like press X Tu VIN and other slag. Jealous, not otherwise.
No, of course, the plot is the backbone of any game. Multiplayer sandbox quickly bored.
I think that now's the times. Eventually people get tired of total multiplayer in games, and the developer will have to re-do singles games.
Was just less quality single in addition are produced in several parts, respectively to compare Dee/trilogy of games relative to itself and other games, and subjectively, the quality immediately drops as 1 piece it is always new, but keep hard
Don't die.For most gamers important a single, and school biodegradable waste only sits online, but these are a minority.
bazilews wrote:
Single mode slowly dying in games,developers increasingly rely on multiplayer.
Tell that to Doom, Wolfenstein, TES series. Funny, but it's only one game Studio, and there are other (Studio).
Just in multiplayer easier to incorporate random items and microtransactions, as the game will be profitable for a long time. But lately the situation with the cases showed that this is not the most profitable system of income from the game.
Even the multiplayer was influenced by the fact that the Internet is now almost everyone, even with him on the phone.
The single and multiplayer has its pros and cons. Combining these two modes in coop, part of the problem is solved, but not all. The problem perhaps is only one!!!
Very few studios who come up with something new and popular. Often the developer doesn't have enough money and experience to develop a good idea to a good finished product. Sometimes, that over time there is the man who in an unsuccessful project or technology see potential and implement it in the new project. But this happens very rarely.
Often the market is oversaturated copies, replicas are one good idea that is implemented well (often even stylized the original). The market is oversaturated and the interest fades away. Save the situation of fashion, where you can add.
Also any idea understood correctly die killing for a game, if this idea is based the whole game. And, no matter where it is implemented in single or multiplayer.
Duck what I mean!?
Now the focus is slowly turning away from the multiplayer. But this will not happen completely until the video game market is not to introduce new, interesting and well-realized idea. Although it can also return the user's attention to the multiplayer.
Don't die. It all depends on the financial aspect, but singles have an advantage - the competition doesn't give up on the game. With multiplayer more difficult. Now the audience is divided between title and beginning of any new project will cut quite hard (you need to give something out of the ordinary), for the time the people is simply not enough for all. Missed the point and has no meaning, since the play is banal to no one. An over saturated market for the genre is more sensitive, and therefore to a greater extent is just an update and not increase the count.
The singles give a slightly different experience. This interactive story. The characters are generally stronger and deeper, the story itself sets and discuss some issues at a fairly deep level, which in itself is very interesting and exciting. Yes, single is not so much work, but still work. Plus this is extremely important, including from the point of view of the image, a springboard for ideological and creative people. And while the multiplayer can't characters and stories to trigger fierce debate as the mages or the Templars, Yen or Triss, to treat if the Krogan" and a great many other disputes, while multiplayer will not be in such a range of feelings brings diversity to the excitement and satisfaction of own skills, nothing will change. And when that happens, hardly anyone will be against such a perfect hybrid.
The worst thing that can happen to a single care in fully console exclusive, that's actually not bad actually.
ValdemarChelMeteor
My friend, VOLVIC failed in the sales evil from the 2nd failed about sales, prey failed in sales. And it's all kind of quality singles. But PUBS and Fortnight, are made of the RAM sticks and now their owners are showered with gold, do you feel what I? Something Gazebo not in a hurry to rivet 6-e scrolls, but for TSO renewal for renewal will hear and feel? Feel? It is not necessary to be seven spans in a forehead to understand what they say in the marketing departments of the studios developers.
And Yes, if you don't buy skins on the exoskeleton in Anhima, you can forget about the existence of Biovars, the Studio famous for its singleplayer games.
Dying and dying, year after year, but still can not die. It's kind of life called? )
now 32 years old I do not care for the multiplayer, not playing and not going.
die alone - the game will stop playing, well, except for nerds cs go, DotA and other drivel.
Caval
If they were really good, it did not fail to. Woolf as a shooter any at all. Prey and I game for everybody. Although sales of the latter more than good.
Why do you compare them with the multiplayer? That those who play in the SLA do not buy the single or something?
Caval
Nevertheless, the first 2 games of restarting Wolfach was successful. The problem is that they tried to cash in on wulfie, a General impression that a New Colossus did another group of developers or restricted in the state. In the New Colossus has obvious flaws that are not taken into account, but to correct their forces Bethesda was easy.
But TES online has not met expectations at the start of sales.
PUBG and Fortnite has evolved, as I said, due to the idea of the battle Royal. PUBG already losing audience because the developer is even weaker than Epic.
But I understand where you're coming from. And again, the situation will not change until something new and interesting. And then see what happens, which side will turn their focus on consumer gaming market.
The single is not going to die! Almost every year though-the one game that is fully sharpened on a single passage with good story, interesting gameplay and setting!
The fact that the single is dying only you to blame yourself. If you are in mad quantities would not be buying all sorts of battles, cold, and paki, and would not pay the real loot for loot boxes, DLS, or any dragon lore, the developers long ago would score on online games. I've been in online games do not play....Played 4 a very long time in the cold and then in pirates...with an emulator of the grid.
NightGameMassacre
They're really good. Not a masterpiece, but good interesting games which the Studio has suffered losses. And the business works so that you first assess risks. And if you pay off will only masterpieces, the one simpleare development money will not be allocated to.
Those who buy pubs to order more of those who buy the single. And I'm not even talking about piracy. This is the first. And the second is that you on the knee to collect the engine, sell luchbox and to Express the money because 5 years, and 3-4 years to kill on the development of the game, which ultimately may not even pay off. Well, which way would you go if the boss of the Studio?