Climate change in the world
So global warming or cooling awaits us?Ryazancev
Why video? There they can blurt out whatever they want without indulging their words.
Referring to Ren TV is the bottom.
Ryazancev
You did not give any evidence of this. Okay, I'll do everything for you. Here is the link: http://www.chaskor.ru/article/mif_i_realnost_klimaticheskogo_oruzhiya__20429
The impact of the Americans on the upper Mekong during the Vietnam War in order to disable the Ho Chi Minh Trail, the road system that supplied the guerrillas in the South Vietnam. Although the Americans managed to cause torrential rains and partially paralyze the supply of the partisans, this required huge material costs (silver iodide, dry ice, etc. are used as agents), but the effect obtained was short-lived.
Local impact ... But in your link http://www.objectiv-x.ru/sekretnye-issledovaniya/klimaticheskoe-oruzhie-oruzhie-massovogo.html it was said about more ambitious.
There was also an interesting phrase: Although it should be remembered that the secret science is ahead of the official one by about a century.
Does anyone believe in this?
As for HAARP, the conspiracy theorists cannot provide any evidence that this climatic weapon. They also cannot provide a single method of large-scale influence on the weather based on physical laws. So the nonsense about the climatic weapon can be left to the fools with ren TV.
stalker7162534
This was a logical assumption. Googled. Deripaska proposed to introduce a tax on carbon dioxide emissions (1 ton = $ 15, I just didn't quite understand if this applies only to enterprises, or if they want to rip off something from us again) http://www.newsru.com/finance /08dec2015/globalnalogderipaska.html
Australia has already increased in 2011, Canada either wants to increase or has already increased the tax in Alberta.
For the sake of money, they will come up with anything, any crazy idea will be pushed into the masses ... and this applies to any country in general.
Ryazancev
" Deforestation and deforestation also play an important role."
I partially agree that the drying up of the Aral Sea can also be attributed to it. But our influence is still local, we mainly affect the biocenosis when we cut down trees or lay pipes in the tundra, but we do not change the climate much.
Ryazancev
Once again. I don't need videos, they can blurt out anything. Links for official documents are needed.
According to the first video: the very beginning is already frightening. Further, they blurted out that meteorological missiles are anti-satellite weapons, which is generally nonsense. What follows is nonsense about a cloud of chemicals in a rocket. The volume of chemicals, judging by the rocket, is small. And these chemicals somehow obscure the view of the spy satellites. What the authors of the program smoked when they came up with all this is unknown. Apparently they did not know that the satellite does not hang in place, but moves in orbit. Next comes verbal diarrhea without a single proof and phrases taken out of context by specialists.
The second video raises the degree of insanity. They said that in Vietnam they sprayed chemicals to make rain in order to destroy the fertility of the land. This is sheer lie. The chemicals destroyed vegetation directly, without causing clouds or changing the weather. And they tried to cause rains by other means, in order to impede movement. This was not done.
In general, delirium on federal channels is not uncommon. In Russia 2, for example, they showed a film about living water, which caused a seething shit in scientific circles. So yes, you're right. Fools.
stalker7162534
I am like an incorrigible skeptic
AND a leading climatologist.
And so on until the temperature on Earth exceeds 100 degrees Celsius, all the water will evaporate, and on Earth it will be the same as on the planet Venus (temperature under 500).
This is impossible. In the Venusian atmosphere, 96.5% of carbon dioxide, and in the earth's - 0.03%. Almost completely the composition of the atmosphere cannot change, at least, without a catastrophe, from which the planet will die anyway.
But when serious government agencies engage in delirium
The main thing is to understand that the source of delirium is not scientists, but pseudoscientists with the support of politicians and the military.
well, as on Venus on earth it can become, but especially without human participation. when the moon flies away and the diurnal period of the earth's rotation slows down. pitch will disappear magnetically and, in short, volcanic activity will cease. and there the earth will heat up inside it, anal gases will swell and then the second period of volcanic activity will begin when the gases come out. then a warm climate will come.
but I don’t know what earlier the sun will burst with anal gases or the earth.
but a person can have fun on his planet as he wants. detonate atomic bombs on pitch play. it can affect the climate there by a few degrees of current.
I haven’t read about it seriously, but it seems that the seasons are changing places - spring is cold, winter is warm.
stalker7162534
"How else to deal with CO2 emissions?"
Initially design metallurgical plants and thermal power plants with wastewater treatment plants for environmental safety. In addition to CO2, the air is polluted with sulfur, which is much more dangerous for people than the mythical influence of our activities on the climate.
In general, delirium on federal channels is not uncommon. In Russia 2, for example, they showed a film about living water, which caused a seething shit in scientific circles.
And not only in the scientific, but in general in the sane.
Fan_Tiesto
So global warming or cooling awaits us?
Depends on the region. But the overall temperature around the planet is slowly but surely rising. And an extra couple of degrees is enough for noticeable climate changes around the world.
global warming
And I thought that everyone had already forgotten about such delirium.
Well, okay, I thought here, if we assume that planet Earth is part of the Solar System, which in turn is part of the Milky Way galaxy, and at the same time, if we take into account the fact that the Solar System is moving relative to the center of the galaxy with a speed about 200 kilometers per second, and the galaxy itself moves through the vastness of space with a rather impressive, but definitely not definite due to too large distances, speed, and if, in addition to all this, we assume that in different parts of space / galaxies there may be hitherto unfamiliar to people or physical quantities, forces or parameters different from the accepted existing ones, then climate change on planet Earth may appear not only theoretically possible without human intervention, but also inevitable.
Whether a person's actions are a catalyst or a moderator of future changes is another question.
Wing42
from the outwardly cosmic forces of the earth threatens the current that the sun can fly through a sufficiently dense gas then there will be ionization of this gas and there the wax will heat better to the earth and it will be like in a stalk the
second that some nanopotsan khan planetoid will fly by and disturb the orbit of the earth's sleepyhead
well and what interests me more is the gravitational waves from the collision with the andromeda. here I believe that they can excite the energy of the pitch of atoms and heat up the wax enough to provoke a volcanic pukanizim. and where gravity there may be still temporary fluctuations, it is of the type even finally, finally, it has not been discovered and the existence of gravitational waves has not been proven.
so that apart from alphacephs nothing especially threatens the earth.
Well, the climate is really changing. On February 11, it is raining outside the window ... is it, like, is it normal in an area equated to the RCS?) At this rate, bananas will soon grow on the streets in Murmansk.
Just 20 years ago, no one would have believed it.
Climate change is cyclical; dependence on humans has not been fully proven. You can measure some levels and attribute changes to human activities, it's easy ...
I remember the story of the theft of information from England about the climate (about the fact that global warming is a lie in order to oblige many countries of the world to pay tribute for industry , which supposedly destroys the planet). Here is the United States: there continue to work, as it were, harmful for the planet industries (from the point of view of the Religion called "Global Warming"), the death penalty has not been abolished everywhere, but why does everyone care? America can? Are they special? Can America's friends also be
allowed ? ... JetRanger
And not only in scientific, but in general in sane.
But after all, studies were carried out on the influence of music and other things on the water, for example, negative emotions of a person (a quarrel in the family, etc.). In general, the denial of this sounds like the conservatism of narrow-minded scientists. There were such at all times, this is a fact)) More than a hundred years ago, in England, for example, many made fun of innovators, and 30 years later - new inventions and spitting in the face of narrow-minded canned food)
You will see, the theory of evolution will be the same, probably already in this century.
Back in the nineties, a number of scientists were skeptical about nanotechnology, but now what? Haha)
A.Soldier of Light
But after all, they conducted research on the influence of music and other things on the water, for example, negative emotions of a person (a quarrel in the family, etc.)
So who did it? Pseudo-upstarts who want to stand out and / or earn extra money from mass ignorance? How these "innovators" carried out their "experiments" and what conclusions they made based on them is a laughing matter for the chickens.
In general, the denial of this sounds like the conservatism of narrow-minded scientists.
The denial of overt pseudoscience is not conservatism, but a normal reaction to outright delirium. Conservatism is when "your theory is wrong because I don't like it!" And in science, a theory is recognized as wrong when it is elementary refuted by facts (as in the case of water). Different things.
And in general, I wish I would just hurry up and announce that ordinary earth has medicinal properties ... I would connect communications on television, muddle up a pretty documentary under some ponteous name like "The Power of the Earth: What Official Science Doesn't Know", I would promote at the same time a book like "Soil treatment at home". And as an authoritative expert for me, Doctor Popov and his famous Live Cucumber would act. I would refer to the "proven tradition of mud therapy" for centuries. And, of course, I would try to organize the sale of bags with especially healing soil samples, because "not every land can be beneficial, here you need to act carefully, wisely ...". Etc. Would you take that seriously? ))
More than a hundred years ago, in England, for example, many laughed at innovators, and 30 years later - new inventions and spitting in the face of narrow-minded canned food It is
one thing to be skeptical, and quite another to support openly unscientific things. Well, many experts used to think that an aircraft is heavier than air - this is nonsense, and so what? At that time, the idea of ​​controlled flight was still impossible to verify, so it remained speculation. For the time being. But with water, it's a completely different matter. Do you doubt that it can be "emotionally charged"? No problem, take and check as much as you like (although for such a liquid that has been studied along and across it is not necessary, everything was done for you long ago). The principle of refutability is one of the pillars of the scientific method.
You will see, with the theory of evolution it will be the same, probably already in this century.
I would agree if evolution were not as real as atoms.
The structure of the atom can be refined, but the fact is that substances consist of atoms. This is already for centuries, for it has been tested. Likewise, evolution is not visible to an inexperienced layman at first glance, but it is CHECKED. And reproduced in the laboratory. And evidence has been collected in abundance - not only and not so much fossils (they generally come as a nice bonus, allowing you to find out some details), as data from molecular biology, the course of embryonic development, comparison of the genomes of different creatures, and much more.
No, you can certainly imagine that we will suddenly begin to find the bones of mammals in the Cambrian rocks ... But for some reason, even the most reptilian mammals clearly did not want to petrify before the Triassic. What is it for?
Seriously, how do you imagine a possible (within the framework of a thought experiment) refutation of the theory of evolution in the future? I can't imagine anything that could refute evolution without contradicting the known data.
A.Soldier of Light
But after all, they conducted research on the influence of music and other things on water, for example, negative human emotions (quarrel in the family, etc.)
This water freak, which penetrated the masses with the film "The Great Secret of Water", I know. Water remembers everything, yeah.
Does anyone really believe in living water? Seriously?
A.Soldier of Light
But there were studies
that showed zero results?
JetRanger
Denial of overt pseudoscience is not conservatism, but a normal reaction to outright nonsense. Conservatism is when "your theory is wrong because I don't like it!"
And it seems to me that it is precisely such a denial that occurs in the mind of the canned, that they do not believe in anything, that at least a little at odds with the official version and the picture of the world. Including evolution)) And also: prohibitions of Tesla's knowledge (free infinite energy), prohibition of the zero element "ether" (Mendeleev), prohibitions of knowledge about levitation (changing the structure of a heavy object to easily move it), etc. There are a lot of such prohibitions.
Not, what can you talk about with a person who denies even the finds of giant skeletons of people or a pyramid in the Crimea? Well? 8) In China, they also found a pyramid and ... kicked out all the researchers from there, classifying the information and the place (white pyramid) ...
See what happens? I believe in this and will live to see the moment when the old picture of the world collapses with shame, I am absolutely sure of this, period. Why did I say this: so that you understand my position)) All this secret knowledge, conspiracy theories .. yes, I'm interested in this, I believe in it. Well, I will immediately lay out the cards on the table so that you understand me instantly) That is, further, if there is something to talk to me about, proceed from what has been said and do not be surprised.
It is also worth adding that there are a lot of alternative versions, but this is not the only point. They are trying to refute the official picture of the world (the official version of events), this is also science. But they sometimes contradict each other =) Either the Moon is full inside and is the point of observation of aliens behind us, then in another version it is part of the once destroyed planet. Both versions are unofficial, but contradict each other. Output? Choose any)
At that time, the idea of ​​a controlled flight was still impossible to test, therefore it remained speculation. For the time being.
That's it. Time will tell how firmly the current picture of the world will continue to hold on under the pressure of finds from the 20th century, including the 21st. It's a matter of time, now you can only speculate (better not, we are not scientists) and .. believe it or not) You are not, but I am.
With regard to evolution, this is the following: the known data is not all, and part of this data is ignored and put on a distant shelf until better times. Finds of human activity tens of millions of years old, parts of the skeleton of giants, pyramids all over the planet (and not only in Egypt) ... Ignore, complete ignorance of all this, just to support the official picture and theory of evolution. Someone benefits from it. How profitable, for example, to classify the engine on the water for cars ...