Venus Project
Project "Venus"Many things in the world do not need a person, corporations slow down the technical process of industrialization .. it is always more profitable to make money on the established ..
Today's incentive is money!
40% of all world wealth is concentrated in the hands of 1% of the world's population.
The army is an outdated social institution.
Jacques Fresco (born March 13, 1916) is a production engineer, architectural designer, social engineer, and futurist based in Florida. His optimistic views and a desire to find a solution that will maximize the benefit for the largest number of people were formed during the Great Depression.
Founder of a libertarian movement called Project Venus.
Resource-based economy
Its main theme is the concept of a "resource-based economy", which replaces the current resource-based monetary economy. Fresco argues that the world is rich in natural and energy resources and that “with new modern technology and reasonable efficiencyâ€, the needs of the entire population of the planet can be met in abundance and, at the same time, removed the current constraints on the possibilities in concepts of economic viability.
To make the idea easier to understand, Fresco gives the following example:
At the start of World War II, the United States had over 600 first-class combat aircraft. But we quickly increased their numbers, producing 90,000 aircraft a year. At the beginning of the war, the question was: Will we have enough money to produce the required instruments of war? The answer was: No, we don't have enough money or gold; but we have more than enough resources. These were the resources available that enabled the United States to achieve the high productivity and efficiency it needed to win the war. Unfortunately, this was only thought about during the war.
Fresco argues that for this concept to function properly, all of the Earth's resources must belong to the common heritage of humanity, and not to several of its individuals. The practice of allocating resources through monetary methods is inappropriate and ineffective for our survival.
-Humanity is already developed enough to change the social structure to solve the problems of survival and improve its life, up to the life of each individual member.
-Universal cybernation and automation of all production processes. Development of artificial intelligence.
- Abolition of money as an instrument of control over resources and productive forces.
-Nationalization of resources and their saving by ending the competition between manufacturers of similar things (capital market).
- Abolition of the "western" types of representative democracies, the transition to universal control over social and industrial life (again, through universal cybernetization - direct expression of will through a computer).
- Freed from the problems of survival and routine work, a person will indulge in creativity, research, etc.
-New principles and programs for teaching children.
3 phases of the project
1. Creation of the planning center for the project "Venus" in Florida (completed).
2. Production of books, brochures, films and video materials about the project, with the involvement of people who create in the same or similar directions. It is also planned to produce a full-length film or television series, reflecting the ideas about the project and ways to create a new society for a large audience.
3. Construction of an experimental city, which will be a visual confirmation of this concept and the center of further research.
Jacques Fresco developed the conceptual view and schemes of the cities of the future, which can accommodate millions of people to live, transport systems, robotic systems for the construction of cities without human intervention, cities at sea, etc.
http://www.thevenusproject.com/
http://veneraproject.ru/
http://www.nibirology.info/future_of_human/venusproject.html
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.ru/UNO/z-index.html
http://nnm.ru/blogs/banger/proekt_venera/
I'm wondering what you think about a resource-based economy - an economy where resources will be the main focus, not profits?
And what does the planet have to do with it (why is the project called that)?
Read the essence of the project
Where will they get a place for the city?
Read the essence of the project
Population?
Read the Project
Summary Resources?
Read the essence of the project
The people are always dissatisfied, but for some reason the development is going on,
you yourself answered your question. The person is dissatisfied, therefore he progresses, for his own satisfaction.
although everything seems to be bad.
Only pessimists are bad.
Of course, the new resource management system according to the Venus project is the best at the moment and the future belongs to the Venus project, it's just a matter of time. But you want a more efficient future to come faster. What if, to adapt the Venus project to the existing system, take into account the presence of a "higher cell" in the management of the new system? This will motivate the "higher cell" to move to the new system, thereby making the Venus project more attractive to a larger number of people who have rejected this system until now. The creation of the second option will create more opportunities for the transition to the new system.
leksey980
Topic 2009 - Necroposting is prohibited on the website. Only the dead can be resurrected. It's harder for the living.
-DENIMUSS -
Where did you see the advice?
leksey980
And it's also good to live under communism - everyone is honest, I'm the only crook. As for the idea - "Fresco claims that the world is rich in natural and energy resources and that" with new modern technology and reasonable efficiency ", the needs of the entire population of the planet can be satisfied in abundance" - then only the first part is correct, the world is rich in resources, but that As far as "reasonable efficiency" is concerned, this is already nonsense, dreams, fairy tales. You can even dream of a ghostly communism in which everyone will plow like horses in an honest way, at least about a wise king who will rule in the best way, that is not an order, but the best for the good of all.
These are fairy tales. That's bullshit.
Everything is very simple. Above the sky, below the earth. People walk on the ground. Everyone wants to eat (and stuff). To get this, you need to wiggle your limbs. Work (do anything to achieve some result - climb a palm tree to pick a banana, pick the ground with a stick to plant potatoes, etc., etc.).
As soon as the division of labor arose, problems arose. The division of labor is beneficial - for the same amount of labor (working time) we get more than when everyone, to support himself (his family), is engaged in all matters - plows, burns pots, weaves fabric, catches fish, weaves sandals. As soon as the division of labor arose, the development of mankind immediately went up.
But a problem arose - how to share the fruits of labor.
How many loaves of bread should be given in exchange for shoes? How many loaves of bread should I give to the driver that brought you to your destination? How many loaves of bread should I give to the doctor who treated you?
And the further, the more difficult. Technology has evolved and evolved to the state of the art. Economic ties have become quite confusing. So how to evaluate the work of a manager, how much more (or less) he should receive in comparison with a turner?
The experience of mankind has shown that attempts to build socialism ended in failure. The only way to support the socialist system was violence. But when people conclude agreements with each other on the basis of cash, that is, money in exchange for something (capitalism, play it like a swing), then society achieves more. But on condition (not everything is so simple) that all people, both rich and poor, understand that no one will take care of you, except yourself. In the sense - when people do not expect that a good king will come who will do everything right (in the sense - it is good for you, for you who are lazy to defend your rights), but constantly defend their rights, fight against the malicious intent of others - they do not give themselves ... ....... how can I say it in European ????? .... to cheat.