Are Western Cartoons Helpful for Our Children?

stalker7162534
Fairy tales are when the story is told, and cartoons are when they still look. So in this thread we are discussing cartoons as the ultimate instance of the adventures of a fairy tale. And yes, I will say it again: cartoons shoot / paint to make money.

If the cartoon is good, then why not. And it does not matter here either the origin or anything else. Only recently there are fewer and fewer of them. Of the "latter", only Toy Story 3 and How to Train Your Dragon can be distinguished (the latter is also surprisingly good, but no more). And ours, in general, after Tugarin, the snake did not remove anything sensible (maybe, if only Dobrynya). And the films for children, so it is generally "removed by the censorship."

Slonvprotivogaze
We have a lot of good cartoons - Luntik, Masha and the Bear.
And Tugarin snakes and the like sucks.

a cartoon cannot be harmful or useful in a certain way. it's leisure and entertainment for the most part. There are of course the type of educational cartoons, but I don't know how they work.
what I consider harmful is
this waxing wrong idea of ​​the laws. in animated cartoons, they often show all sorts of dangerous actions, but anal pains and injuries of the anus, as a rule, do not have long-term consequences or finally do not have any consequences. foreign psychologists believe that this is correct, I think not.
Secondly, this waxing is an easy and final achievement of positive results and goals. the main goodie usually achieves his goals without stretching the rolls too much. in life it is not so.
in fact, this is not suitable for children under 4-6 years old, since the child will receive such an initial setting and can be disadapted. however, in fact, if you look at the cartoons for sure, they have a +6 rating.
that is, by and large, in order to watch the TV and play games, the basis of the personality must already be formed. how to finish this is a big question. For the specificity of recent years, that the parents do little to educate their children. although if you think it like that, it was in the scoop ...
for example, games work in a similar way. low danger and easy goal achievement.
All this means that the kid is not vigilant enough and is waiting for an easy cheating artman's life.
the second point is this development of morality and morality comes from an understanding and a sense of personal responsibility. in stylish conditions, far from life, no morality can arise. for morality it is necessary to play a role-playing garden of the game so that a person can perceive himself and others in an abstract manner from the situation. put yourself in the shoes of nano posona and alphacef.
American cartoons, as a rule, do not give this because there is a certain undeniable gradation of good and evil, which is a moral teaching program. in the especially stubborn cartoons at the end, work is carried out - like the moral of the fable was this ... pedagogically, this does not work because the kid rejects any teaching that is imposed on him. current knowledge and conclusions obtained independently have a pedagogical value. and cartoons suggesting this are, as it were, intended for older children. so waxing then morality comes through murder swearing and bdsm porn.
however, recently I was attracted by another important pitch detail. it turns out that in the principle of the human brain's work there is a certain mechanism that determines social behavior and some initial moral taboos, in contrast to mathematical models of intelligence that come to slightly different results. therefore, the child in childhood simply needs to be more generalized with parents and noticed and spied on how they interact, and not receive some abstracted academic information.
the second thing worth noting is that the child has a certain inner census of information. the brain is a rather powerful analytical machine that combines like and like and forms conceptual clusters on the basis of this. This is expressed by the fact that, in principle, different things fall into the field when listening to a child and an adult when watching the same cartoon or movie. therefore, let's say the naked boobs of a ribenok and an adult muzhik perceives differently.
therefore, it is impossible to say unequivocally whether any mults cause any definite harm. it is just that the information and experience should be sufficiently varied and be compatible with those of their peers.

MunchkiN 616
Well, not a fig for myself painted. )

It's just that foreign ones come out very very often, and ours, somehow, not very much, that's why they watch foreign ones. but our Malta is also carbon monoxide)

Maxim Kalashnikov96
There are 194 states in the world. (not counting ugly creatures such as the DNI and South Ossetia). So there are more foreign cartoons than domestic ones. And I am glad that now you can watch cartoons from different countries. Not like in the USSR, when an uncle with gray hair decided what cartoons the freest children of the freest country could watch.

stalker7162534
And then everyone was happy Well, wait a minute !!
For some reason.

Some real estate is being offered to me by reference.